Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,468
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    kmsrocknj
    Newest Member
    kmsrocknj
    Joined

January 2026 Medium/Long Range Discussion


snowfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Terpeast said:

I think “kicker” is an unfortunate misnomer for the thing being talked about. It’s not so much “kicking” the wave east as it is lowering heights behind the wave that prevents it from digging further south and going negative tilt at the right time for us. I think that’s what is meant. 

I don't think the "kicker" is really negatively interacting much with the lead wave. Typically in fact a lead wave will amplify a trof structure if it's downstream of another wave embedded in the longwave trof. The bigger issue IMO is the ULL in Quebec and its interactions with the developing trof.

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CAPE said:

Still not much to be excited about at the surface on the 18z Eps. Need to see some improvement over the next few model cycles. GEFS too.

As I mentioned earlier with a complex set up like this one ens will take some time to catch up if the op is onto the right idea. Maybe by tomorrow night or Monday. We seen ensembles show 6”+ for a day 5 storm before and it resulted in nothing. Last year prime example. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CAPE said:

Still not much to be excited about at the surface on the 18z Eps. Need to see some improvement over the next few model cycles. GEFS too.

Yah, I know you hate the snow maps, but they stink for the upcoming work week. No support for a big storm yet.... WB 18Z GEFS and EPS.

IMG_7195.png

IMG_7196.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TSSN+ said:

As I mentioned earlier with a complex set up like this one ens will take some time to catch up if the op is onto the right idea. Maybe by tomorrow night or Monday. We seen ensembles show 6”+ for a day 5 storm before and it resulted in nothing. Last year prime example. 

And there is a flip side to this, how infrequent that may be. Jan 2024 gave us a pair of NS storms that dropped 2-5” across our area. Ens means were an inch or less up until 24 hours before the event - in both cases. 

BUT the lack of ens support is a red flag that we can look back on if this event fails to materialize for us. 

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Weather Will said:

Yah, I know you hate the snow maps, but they stink for the upcoming work week. No support for a big storm yet....

IMG_7195.png

IMG_7196.png

I just look at precip. Its paltry. If the snow maps suck too that means we aren't getting much of anything- no rain either.

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Terpeast said:

And there is a flip side to this, how infrequent that may be. Jan 2024 gave us a pair of NS storms that dropped 2-5” across our area. Ens means were an inch or less up until 24 hours before the event. 

I remember the heady days of dec 17, 2009 every time they issued a new storm warning update, the snow total forecast increased another 6" over the last issue.  Seems like a lifetime ago.  I was never so excited to hit the refresh button on my browser.  

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Terpeast said:

And there is a flip side to this, how infrequent that may be. Jan 2024 gave us a pair of NS storms that dropped 2-5” across our area. Ens means were an inch or less up until 24 hours before the event - in both cases. 

BUT the lack of ens support is a red flag that we can look back on if this event fails to materialize for us. 

The looks are pretty but we only have the GFS and like 100hr old runs of the ICON. Can’t say we weren’t warned if/when we get nothing 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SomeguyfromTakomaPark said:

We all know the drill, when the GFS is showing a big storm without support in a marginal airmass, it’s most likely not correct. But hey, u never know!!

But there is some movement toward it vs away, which makes it a little harder to disregard the Gfs completely imho.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...