Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,463
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    kmsrocknj
    Newest Member
    kmsrocknj
    Joined

January 2026 OBS and Discussion


TriPol
 Share

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, bluewave said:

Our area generally doesn’t get big East Coast snowstorms when there is a strong kicker coming through the Great Lakes and a weak cold high pressure in between.

IMG_5564.gif.2e30239306ec270380cf9b01789d40a0.gif

 

unless the low in the east coast merges with the kicker! and it actually slows the storm down completely but it has to be perfect timing. 

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, bluewave said:

Our area generally doesn’t get big East Coast snowstorms when there is a strong kicker coming through the Great Lakes and a weak cold high pressure in between.

IMG_5564.gif.2e30239306ec270380cf9b01789d40a0.gif

I'd also like to see the ridge axis further east by about 10 degrees and I'd also like to see a 50/50 low to lock in cold air.  Map as shown has fast flow off and along the east coast.  Would take something to make that dog bark.  Nice map to look at but to me it is more of a meow meow.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WeatherGeek2025 said:

unless the low in the east coast merges with the kicker! and it actually slows the storm down completely but it has to be perfect timing. 

Very difficult to pull off a phase like that with such a dominant Northern Stream pattern and lack of cold high pressure in place.

  • Like 2
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, eduggs said:

12z GFS is closest to an east coast snowstorm. It has a thin, high amplitude trof that rapidly takes on a negative tilt. This is at the extreme end of its multi-day ensemble spread. And it still misses well east. Then look at the CMC, ICON, and UK. All not close. GFS-AI and ECM are less dreadful but not great. Any reasonable look at this would have to conclude that an east coast snowstorm next week is a longshot at this juncture. I really really hope it changes for the better. But if we want to be rational, we should acknowledge the situation for what it is.

You said it best earlier.  Ensemble support is not there.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, NorthShoreWx said:

That looks like a MA blockbuster with snow to mix and dry slot NYC to BOS.  I guess I'm still a little disappointed about 1993 :)

And that makes sense since that looks like a DT graphic and he lives in VA last I knew. Assuming it is some other forecasters graphic it should be in the banter thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, bluewave said:

The 1960s had the best Long Island and surrounding area radiational cooling following the big snowstorms of that era. 

 for January 21, 1961 through January 31, 1961
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
NY SHRUB OAK COOP -25
NY CARMEL COOP -24
NJ CANOE BROOK COOP -21
CT WESTBROOK COOP -21
NY PORT JERVIS COOP -20
CT WATERBURY RADIO WBRY COOP -19
NJ CHARLOTTEBURG RESERVOIR COOP -18
CT STAMFORD 5 N COOP -18
CT MOUNT CARMEL COOP -17
NY SUFFERN COOP -16
CT DANBURY COOP -16
NY BEDFORD HILLS COOP -16
NY STEWART FIELD WBAN -15
NJ WANAQUE RAYMOND DAM COOP -14
CT GROTON COOP -14
CT NORWICH PUBLIC UTILITY PLANT COOP -13
NY PATCHOGUE 2 N COOP -12
CT COLCHESTER 2 W COOP -12
NJ LITTLE FALLS COOP -11
NY MIDDLETOWN 2 NW COOP -10
NY SCARSDALE COOP -10
NY WESTCHESTER CO AP WBAN -10
NJ ELIZABETH COOP -10
CT MIDDLETOWN 4 W COOP -10
NY WEST POINT COOP -7
CT NORWALK GAS PLANT COOP -7
NJ PLAINFIELD COOP -7
CT NEW HAVEN TWEED AP WBAN -7
NY HEMPSTEAD GARDEN CITY COOP -2
NY SETAUKET STRONG COOP -2
NY RIVERHEAD RESEARCH FARM COOP -2
NY BRIDGEHAMPTON COOP -2
CT IGOR I SIKORSKY MEMORIAL AIRPORT WBAN -1
NJ PATERSON COOP -1
NY WESTHAMPTON GABRESKI AP WBAN -1


 

Monthly Snowfall Data for January 1961 for Upton NY NWS CWA
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
NY WARWICK COOP 45.2
NY GARDNERVILLE COOP 44.0
NJ GREENWOOD LAKE COOP 37.6
NY PORT JERVIS COOP 37.2
NY WEST POINT COOP 35.9
CT WOLCOTT RESERVOIR COOP 33.5
NY DOBBS FERRY-ARDSLEY COOP 32.7
NJ PATERSON COOP 32.5
NJ MAHWAH COOP 32.0
NY WESTCHESTER CO AP WBAN 31.1
NJ MIDLAND PARK COOP 31.0
NJ CHARLOTTEBURG RESERVOIR COOP 31.0
NY SCARSDALE COOP 30.9
NY CARMEL COOP 30.0
NJ CANOE BROOK COOP 29.0
NY STEWART FIELD WBAN 28.0
NY BEDFORD HILLS COOP 27.7
NJ RINGWOOD COOP 27.5
NY SHRUB OAK COOP 27.5
NY BRIDGEHAMPTON COOP 27.4
CT STAMFORD 5 N COOP 27.0
CT MIDDLETOWN 4 W COOP 26.2
CT COCKAPONSET RANGER STA COOP 25.0
NJ WANAQUE RAYMOND DAM COOP 24.0
NJ LITTLE FALLS COOP 22.8
CT WATERBURY RADIO WBRY COOP 22.5
NJ NEWARK LIBERTY INTL AP WBAN 22.2
NY PATCHOGUE 2 N COOP 21.6
NY NY WESTERLEIGH STAT IS COOP 21.5
NY WESTHAMPTON GABRESKI AP WBAN 21.5
NJ CEDAR GROVE COOP 21.0
NY SUFFERN COOP 20.6
NJ PLAINFIELD COOP 20.5
NJ IRVINGTON COOP 20.5
NY HEMPSTEAD GARDEN CITY COOP 20.5
CT COLCHESTER 2 W COOP 20.2
NY NEW YORK LAUREL HILL COOP 20.0
NY MINEOLA COOP 20.0
CT DANBURY COOP 20.0
CT NEW HAVEN TWEED AP WBAN 20.0
CT GROTON COOP 20.0
Data for February 7, 1967 through February 14, 1967
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
NY STEWART FIELD WBAN -20
NY SHRUB OAK COOP -16
NY MIDDLETOWN 2 NW COOP -16
CT COLCHESTER 2 W COOP -15
CT WESTBROOK COOP -15
NY ISLIP-LI MACARTHUR AP WBAN -14
NY CARMEL COOP -12
CT MOUNT CARMEL COOP -12
CT STAMFORD 5 N COOP -11
CT DANBURY COOP -10
CT MIDDLETOWN 4 W COOP -10
NJ CHARLOTTEBURG RESERVOIR COOP -10
NY PORT JERVIS COOP -10
CT GROTON COOP -9
CT NORWICH PUBLIC UTILITY PLANT COOP -9
NJ CANOE BROOK COOP -9
NY SUFFERN COOP -8
CT NORWALK GAS PLANT COOP -7
NY SCARSDALE COOP -6
NY WESTCHESTER CO AP WBAN -6
NY YORKTOWN HEIGHTS 1W COOP -5
NY WESTHAMPTON GABRESKI AP WBAN -5
NY BEDFORD HILLS COOP -4
NJ WANAQUE RAYMOND DAM COOP -4
NY WEST POINT COOP -4
NY PATCHOGUE 2 N COOP -4
CT NEW HAVEN TWEED AP WBAN -3
CT IGOR I SIKORSKY MEMORIAL AIRPORT WBAN -2
NJ PLAINFIELD COOP -2
NJ LITTLE FALLS COOP -2
NY HEMPSTEAD GARDEN CITY COOP -1


 

Monthly Snowfall Data for February 1967 for Upton NY NWS CWA
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
CT WOLCOTT RESERVOIR COOP 34.2
CT COLCHESTER 2 W COOP 33.2
CT EASTON RESERVOIR COOP 32.5
CT COCKAPONSET RANGER STA COOP 32.3
NY STEWART FIELD WBAN 32.1
NY WARWICK COOP 32.1
CT DANBURY COOP 31.6
NY BRIDGEHAMPTON COOP 30.5
NY SCARSDALE COOP 30.5
NY WESTCHESTER CO AP WBAN 29.6
NY NY WESTERLEIGH STAT IS COOP 29.5
CT TRAP FALLS RESERVOIR COOP 29.5
NJ PLAINFIELD COOP 29.1
NJ CHARLOTTEBURG RESERVOIR COOP 28.6
NY BEDFORD HILLS COOP 28.5
NY DOBBS FERRY-ARDSLEY COOP 28.1
NY MINEOLA COOP 28.0
NY PATCHOGUE 2 N COOP 27.8
NY NEW YORK LAUREL HILL COOP 27.7
CT WESTBROOK COOP 27.6
NJ MIDLAND PARK COOP 27.5
NY WESTHAMPTON GABRESKI AP WBAN 27.3
NJ CANOE BROOK COOP 27.0
NY CARMEL COOP 27.0
NJ PATERSON COOP 26.8
NJ WANAQUE RAYMOND DAM COOP 26.6
NY WEST POINT COOP 26.3
NY YORKTOWN HEIGHTS 1W COOP 26.0
NY SHRUB OAK COOP 25.5
NJ NEWARK LIBERTY INTL AP WBAN 25.4
CT NEW HAVEN TWEED AP WBAN 25.3
CT MIDDLETOWN 4 W COOP 25.3
CT STAMFORD 5 N COOP 25.3
NY GARDNERVILLE COOP 25.0
CT MOUNT CARMEL COOP 24.6
NY RIVERHEAD RESEARCH FARM COOP 24.3
CT NORWALK GAS PLANT COOP 24.3
NY NEW YORK AVE V BROOKLYN COOP 24.0
CT IGOR I SIKORSKY MEMORIAL AIRPORT WBAN 24.0
NY HEMPSTEAD GARDEN CITY COOP 23.8
NY PORT JERVIS COOP 23.7
NY NY CITY CENTRAL PARK WBAN 23.6
NJ GREENWOOD LAKE COOP 20.5
NY LAGUARDIA AIRPORT WBAN 20.0

 

Great data as always. 
 

I know you were just using Upton area temperatures but that was also the period Poughkeepsie recorded their all time low of -30. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, WeatherGeek2025 said:

unless the low in the east coast merges with the kicker! and it actually slows the storm down completely but it has to be perfect timing. 

I took the photo below in April 2024.  This from a park in upstate NY called Mexico Point State Park.  It’s on the shore of Lake Ontario right in the heart of the snow belt country.  It looks and feels like the shore of LI Sound.  A town called Pulaski just a few miles away recorded 4 feet of snow in two days with a lake effect event in the past two weeks.  If you want to see KU style snow events each year this is where you need to be.

IMG_2190.jpeg

  • Like 2
  • 100% 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

An orderly pattern progression remains underway. In the extended range, that progression should culminate in a return to colder weather with persistently below normal temperatures. 

A storm heading through the Great Lakes will bring rain tomorrow into early Sunday. A general 0.50"-1.00" rainfall appears likely across much of the region. 

Through the middle of next week, highs will generally reach the 40s during the daytime and 30s for lows in New York City. Somewhat colder readings are likely outside the City and in areas where strong radiational cooling takes place.

After the middle of next week, temperatures will "step down" with highs mainly in the middle and upper 30s in New York City and lows in the middle and upper 20s.

No significant Arctic blasts or significant snowfalls are likely through at least mid-January.

Afterward, conditions might become more favorable for both cold and snowfall, especially if the PNA goes positive. PNA-related developments would have larger implications for snowfall. A persistently positive PNA would have above climatological risk of moderate or significant snowfalls. A mainly negative PNA would favor mainly small snowfalls. It will likely be a few more days before the guidance reaches the high-skill timeframe for teleconnection forecasts. 

The ENSO Region 1+2 anomaly was -0.7°C and the Region 3.4 anomaly was -0.5°C for the week centered around December 31. For the past six weeks, the ENSO Region 1+2 anomaly has averaged -0.37°C and the ENSO Region 3.4 anomaly has averaged -0.63°C. La Niña conditions will likely continue into at least late winter.

The SOI was +4.62 today. 

The preliminary Arctic Oscillation (AO) was -1.466 today. 

Based on sensitivity analysis applied to the latest guidance, there is an implied near 55% probability that New York City will have a cooler than normal January (1991-2020 normal). January will likely finish with a mean temperature near 33.4° (-0.3° below normal). 

Supplemental Information: The projected mean would be 0.8° above the 1981-2010 normal monthly value.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tatamy said:

I took the photo below in April 2024.  This from a park in upstate NY called Mexico Point State Park.  It’s on the shore of Lake Ontario right in the heart of the snow belt country.  It looks and feels like the shore of LI Sound.  A town called Pulaski just a few miles away recorded 4 feet of snow in two days with a lake effect event in the past two weeks.  If you want to see KU style snow events each year this is where you need to be.

IMG_2190.jpeg

Absolutely and I think its either Fulton or Mexico that has a state record 7 foot storm total from LE.  Back in the 90s I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WeatherGeek2025 said:

it's happened before so it's not impossible!

 

improbable but not impossible 

Why did you make this post? Do you think Bluewave needs you to teach him this? Does the general American Wx community benefit from optimism divorced from reality, via a post that has no substance? 

 

Welcome to the boards, I'll guess that you're on the younger end. Noone wants to stifle your enthusiasm but as others have said please read what you've written before you post and ask if it is a valuable contribution that would be interesting to others. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Monty said:

Why did you make this post? Do you think Bluewave needs you to teach him this? Does the general American Wx community benefit from optimism divorced from reality, via a post that has no substance? 

 

Welcome to the boards, I'll guess that you're on the younger end. Noone wants to stifle your enthusiasm but as others have said please read what you've written before you post and ask if it is a valuable contribution that would be interesting to others. 

thank you and sorry didn't mean to sound like i'm educating, I was just stating the obvious that there is always a possibility of a phase! I am not young i'm an old weather geek tbh and ive been following this board for 15 years already and I decided to make an account. Have a good weekend sir

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tatamy said:

I took the photo below in April 2024.  This from a park in upstate NY called Mexico Point State Park.  It’s on the shore of Lake Ontario right in the heart of the snow belt country.  It looks and feels like the shore of LI Sound.  A town called Pulaski just a few miles away recorded 4 feet of snow in two days with a lake effect event in the past two weeks.  If you want to see KU style snow events each year this is where you need to be.

IMG_2190.jpeg

went fishing there a couple times back in 90 and 91. i've heard the epic man made salmon runs are largely a thing of the past in most of the lakes, as the invasive alewives themselves could not survive the lakes. efforts are underway to restore natural fisheries, though iirc ontario did have salmon at one time, unlike the other lakes. the fishing i saw there did not make me want to go back, i'll say that. but i was fishing with a bunch of amateurs.....i had read a recent book on the lakes and there is a documentary out there i saw, i've always been fascinated by these huge freshwater seas.....even this photo does not impart the sheer vastness of the lake....

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, gravitylover said:

There were places just north and east of the big zone this year that got well over 100" in the big event last year. The dick waving banter in the local Fb groups in that area is funny.

i simply would not want to live in such a place. there's such a thing as too much of a good thing. 4-8 is about right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, WeatherGeek2025 said:

thank you and sorry didn't mean to sound like i'm educating, I was just stating the obvious that there is always a possibility of a phase! I am not young i'm an old weather geek tbh and ive been following this board for 15 years already and I decided to make an account. Have a good weekend sir

its a message board; don't take it personally. you'd probably be friends in the real world, because there aren't many out there who enjoy snow....not in these parts.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, cleetussnow said:

Then its not a miller b. Its a whiff.  Miller bs are more reliable IMO - but they can whiff kicker and miss of course

my understanding is the storm can phase too far east or north....seen that more than a few times.....jan 2015, march 2001....they were still good storms, just not for us....i did get 7 inches in jan 2015 though, and 6 in feb 2013, which felt like a win after that winter....if those were miller b's....

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, weatherpruf said:

my understanding is the storm can phase too far east or north....seen that more than a few times.....jan 2015, march 2001....they were still good storms, just not for us....i did get 7 inches in jan 2015 though, and 6 in feb 2013, which felt like a win after that winter....if those were miller b's....

Oh yeah. They phase in the wrong place at the wrong time for sure.  A Miller A is a blind dart throw.  Inland runner, cosstal runner, benchmark…my bust memories are miller As. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...