Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,349
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    happyclam13
    Newest Member
    happyclam13
    Joined

December 2025 OBS and Discussion


wdrag
 Share

Recommended Posts

40 minutes ago, eduggs said:

The last two GFS op runs are well east of the GEFS mean days 5 through 6 with the shortwave and SLP in the east. The GEFS mean shows precipitation primarily in the lower MS valley while the op GFS shows it along and off the east coast. Discounting the op runs for now though an eastward trend is noted in the other mid-range op models. The GEFS seem to be somewhat of a compromise between the 12z EPS and GEPS. The GEFS would put us right on the edge of both significant precipitation and marginal temperatures for wintry precipitation. :popcorn:

18z AI Euro ticked northwest. Gives the coast and Inland some accumulations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't complain about the 0z GFS. We haven't had a widespread coastal snowstorm like that in a while. Gorgeous ouput! CMC, ICON, ECM, and ensembles close enough for interest. Hopefully no big swings from here on out (doubtful)... Small, incremental improvements would be ideal. We are still almost a week out, so it's still going to be tough to pull this off I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, eduggs said:

Can't complain about the 0z GFS. We haven't had a widespread coastal snowstorm like that in a while. Gorgeous ouput! CMC, ICON, ECM, and ensembles close enough for interest. Hopefully no big swings from here on out (doubtful)... Small, incremental improvements would be ideal. We are still almost a week out, so it's still going to be tough to pull this off I think.

Gfs is  active and cold . Nice to see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, eduggs said:

The 0z GFS is an absolutely filthy glutton for snow. I'm going to pretend I didn't see the extended run and keep my personal focus on the mid-range.

Nice ridge out west and plenty of cold. What a turnaround from the models.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MJO812 said:

Nice ridge out west and plenty of cold. What a turnaround from the models.

The GFS retrogrades the CA ULL west into the Pacific. If that doesn't happen, the longwave flow across the US would be significantly altered. Our downstream weather is extremely sensitive to the modeled evolution of the western trof over this period. Could still end up balls cold or periodically torched days 6-15.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MJO812 said:

Anyone looking at the 0z gfs ? Nice snowstorm next week.

The important feature is the strong enough cold enough HP in southeast Canada staying PUT long enough to keep feeding the cold enough air in and storm track is perfect Benchmark because of this

prateptype_cat-imp.conus.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The OZ UKMET looks to be a closer to the coast track as the HP in southeast Canada is not as strong - starting at least as Frozen in the metro - the Canadian and the Euro AI are offshore tracks

prateptype_ukmo-imp.conus.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 0Z Euro starts as frozen in the metro BUT that HP does not stay anchored like in the GFS run so there is a change over to rain - still to early to predict the outcome except to say the storm chances are increasing and a frozen to rain scenario is favored right now IMO

prateptype_cat_ecmwf-imp.conus.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, NEG NAO said:

The 0Z Euro starts as frozen in the metro BUT that HP does not stay anchored like in the GFS run so there is a change over to rain - still to early to predict the outcome except to say the storm chances are increasing and a frozen to rain scenario is favored right now IMO

prateptype_cat_ecmwf-imp.conus.png

Quite possible. Just need the right track. Here is the 6z gfs 

sn10_acc-imp.us_ne.png

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ll be the hater here: Why would we have such a big snowstorm down to the shore in an early part of the season (first week of December) when we usually don’t? (I’m aware that it’s snowed during this time in the past, et. al.) The universe usually aligns against it.

Ok, I’d enjoy being wrong, but interested in knowing why it would occur. Thank you and safe travels today!


.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we can keep the western ridge, it should keep the SE ridge in check enough to give us a chance at a good storm track near the coast. There should be cold air to the north to pull down. But if we lose that ridge we risk it turning into a SWFE buzz kill because the SE ridge will respond and overwhelm it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, North and West said:

I’ll be the hater here: Why would we have such a big snowstorm down to the shore in an early part of the season (first week of December) when we usually don’t? (I’m aware that it’s snowed during this time in the past, et. al.) The universe usually aligns against it.

Ok, I’d enjoy being wrong, but interested in knowing why it would occur. Thank you and safe travels today!


.

Its rather easy to see why it would occur - that HP has to stay in place and block the storm into a favorable path for I-95 and provide the cold air source and be in a position to restrict the onshore warmer winds off the ocean - concentrate on the HP positioning

prateptype_cat-imp.conus.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

December 3rd will probably be a good sample of what the storm tracks will do this winter. 

The last 7 winters we have seen a very dominant and fast Northern Steam of the Pacific Jet lead to three dominant storm tracks. 

Track #1 has been a Great Lakes cutter leading an amplified Southeast ridge and mostly rain near the coast. In this case there is enough separation in the fast Pacific flow for one system to really amplify pumping the Southeast ridge on the day of the storm. 

Track #2 featured just enough wave separation for an I-78 to I-84 hugger storm track. This has been a snow to sleet and rain scenario along the coast. A bit of a WAR or Western Atlantic ridge on storm day. 

Track #3 has seen kicker troughs coming into Western North America suppressing the Southern Stream storm tracks.

The Benchmark track with a record number of KU snowstorms which has dominated from 2010 to 2018 has been largely absent leading to the record low snowfall last 7 seasons. This has been a result of the much stronger Northern Stream of the Pacific Jet since 2018-2019.

If we can get the storm track on December 3rd to show some small deviation, then maybe we can see at least some small improvement this winter. We would want to see a deep enough coastal development near the Benchmark to have some hope in snowfall improvement this winter. 

Since 1995-1996 we have had 15 La Niña winters as defined by the RONI index. 14 out of 15 of those winters followed a repeating pattern which has been common the last 30 years. EWR, NYC, and LGA December snowfall pattern repeated throughout the entire winter. The Decembers with under 4” of snowfall at those stations went on to below average seasonal snowfall. With the Decembers over 4” or snow featuring average to naive average snowfall. 

You might ask how can this work out over 90% of the time?  My guess is that La Ninas tend to show what they are capable of early on in the season. Plus as our climate has warmed it has lead to more repeating and persistent patterns. So I view this December to winter snowfall relationship more as a marker of a deeper underlying shared pattern  rather than something that is directly causing the outcome.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, NEG NAO said:

Its rather easy to see why it would occur - that HP has to stay in place and block the storm into a favorable path for I-95 and provide the cold air source and be in a position to restrict the onshore warmer winds off the ocean - concentrate on the HP positioning

prateptype_cat-imp.conus.png

Yep, this time of year especially we need a strong cold air source on storm day, if that high slips east winds turn onshore and it’s game over. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its rather easy to see why it would occur - that HP has to stay in place and block the storm into a favorable path for I-95 and provide the cold air source and be in a position to restrict the onshore warmer winds off the ocean - concentrate on the HP positioning
prateptype_cat-imp.conus.png

tyvm! I hope your idea verifies. Be nice to have everyone smile.


.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...