katabatic Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 41 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said: with variance due to climate change, I would argue that the large storms that do occur, even with lower frequency, would be bigger than the ones that we've classically seen. 2016 wouldn't have been quite as impactful 30 years ago This is a legit question and not a troll. Also, might belong in banter, so if it needs a new home, feel free. But the question I have is the (perceived) lack of large east coast storms. Why? The theme of climate change seems to be an overall increase in storm frequency, an overall increase in precipitation. We have all seen the reports of incredible precipitation events around the globe. The oceans are on fire, so it certainly isn't a lack of potential energy. I'm an economist, not a met but it would seem like there would be more large storms (perhaps blinding rain vs snow) vs just a sheared out mess that seems to be the predominant storm type of late. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JenkinsJinkies Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 40 minutes ago, katabatic said: This is a legit question and not a troll. Also, might belong in banter, so if it needs a new home, feel free. But the question I have is the (perceived) lack of large east coast storms. Why? The theme of climate change seems to be an overall increase in storm frequency, an overall increase in precipitation. We have all seen the reports of incredible precipitation events around the globe. The oceans are on fire, so it certainly isn't a lack of potential energy. I'm an economist, not a met but it would seem like there would be more large storms (perhaps blinding rain vs snow) vs just a sheared out mess that seems to be the predominant storm type of late. I think they’re talking about snow storms specifically. The winter base state has gotten warmer meaning that we really need to thread the needle or else it’ll be too warm. psuhoffman can show you that overall snow in the region is trending downward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
katabatic Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 16 minutes ago, JenkinsJinkies said: I think they’re talking about snow storms specifically. The winter base state has gotten warmer meaning that we really need to thread the needle or else it’ll be too warm. psuhoffman can show you that overall snow in the region is trending downward. I get that...what I don't understand is why aren't there big storms (of any kind, snow or rain) during the winter. With as much potential energy in the oceans as there is, you'd think the smallest perturbation would kick start a storm. Sure, we've seen some decent ones here and there, but nothing of note for nearly a decade. I am curious why given how much energy is available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxUSAF Posted 9 minutes ago Share Posted 9 minutes ago The simple answer is we’ve been in a long -ENSO/-PDO cycle. Northern stream dominant with a weak subtropical jet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winter_warlock Posted 9 minutes ago Share Posted 9 minutes ago On 8/14/2025 at 10:33 PM, Jebman said: Frigid cold Texas sweet tea and lemonade, amid visions of a ice locked entire eastern section of America this winter, alongside frigid vodka cold northerly winds and deep drifting snow. Yessss !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormchaserchuck1 Posted 1 minute ago Share Posted 1 minute ago 54 minutes ago, katabatic said: I get that...what I don't understand is why aren't there big storms (of any kind, snow or rain) during the winter. With as much potential energy in the oceans as there is, you'd think the smallest perturbation would kick start a storm. Sure, we've seen some decent ones here and there, but nothing of note for nearly a decade. I am curious why given how much energy is available. A big problem has been the upper latitude pattern. This big ridge in the N. Pacific is -PNA Here's the Winter sea-level pressure pattern with PNA (map is default positive, so what's happened lately is opposite of this map) ^Notice the low SLP off the east coast. -0.3 is pretty significant correlation. We've been seeing -PNA (North Pacific pattern), so there has been more tendency downstream for High pressure along the east coast and off the coast. That's just the Pacific.. in the Atlantic since 2011-2012, 83% of the Winter months have had +NAO! In that time monthly NAO readings of >1.11 have been positive 18-0. Here's the SLP correlation with NAO, this map is default positive so in +NAO, like we have seen lately, it is like this Again, very High pressure correlation. Add the Pacific and Atlantic upper latitude patterns together and you have 5x more likely to have east coast, or off the east coast High pressure vs Low pressure. That's the pattern we've been in since 2011-2012 and more so since 2016-2017. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now