Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,599
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    eloveday
    Newest Member
    eloveday
    Joined

2025-2026 ENSO


Recommended Posts

53 minutes ago, donsutherland1 said:

The world is warmer than it has been and is continuing to warm largely due to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. Extreme cold periods are becoming warmer and less frequent than they once were. Nevertheless, that does not mean that such cold, when it occurs regionally, should be dismissed out-of-hand. The kind of sustained deep cold that has occurred in the Great Lakes Region and Northeast is uncommon today. It is not trivial. It is one of this winter's highlights. 

For example, New York City saw a 16-day mean temperature below 20° for the 125th time since record-keeping began in 1869. However, it was the first such occurrence since 1982. That was 44 years ago. That rarity makes it noteworthy. Moreover, it's plausible that at least some of us might not see such sustained and deep cold again during our lifetimes given how infrequent it has become.

That places like Phoenix are on course for their warmest winter on record does not minimize the cold that has just occurred elsewhere. That it has occurred in a warmer and warming world makes it all the more remarkable.

Don, once you adjust normals upward to take into account GW, is deep cold still about as common as it ever was? Example: adjust normals upward by 3F vs what normals were from around 1900. After doing so, is same degree of extreme cold about as common as it was then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, GaWx said:

Don, once you adjust normals upward to take into account GW, is deep cold still about as common as it ever was? Example: adjust normals upward by 3F vs what normals were from around 1900. After doing so, is same degree of extreme cold about as common as it was then?

If one takes off about 2.5°, they'd be about as common as they once were.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said:

I think the consistency of 10s and low 20s for highs and lows in the 0s.. for like a 3 week period down here is pretty impressive. I held 8" snowcover for 2.5 weeks, which is really rare. This happened without real strong upper latitude patterns, like a -NAO or -EPO, although the AO was severely negative:

3a.png

This is due to inadequacy of relying on the standard teleconnections with patterns like this. It was a weaker version of January 1994 and 2004. Those patterns were colder and sustained for a month instead of 15-20 days like this one was.

While it doesn’t have a formal name, the key driver of the cold was the 500mb block north of Alaska. That is a very cold teleconnection in the East.

You can find other examples such as 12-26-17 to 1-8-18. This was the coldest 16 day period around NYC Metro since then.

 
 

IMG_5783.gif.ee69b1954698072f49c84fc7f0addc80.gif

IMG_5784.gif.7b6b93c71ce1b6ffbaef989a22ece271.gif

IMG_5785.gif.0238587adb3f4d9e84d8864f7934da75.gif

IMG_5786.gif.ba43c8438f7a2fbb2399875c93d47896.gif

 

 

Minimum 16-Day Mean Avg Temperature 
for WESTCHESTER CO AP, NY
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
1 16.8 2017-12-26 through 2018-01-10 0
2 16.9 2017-12-25 through 2018-01-09 0
3 17.1 2017-12-24 through 2018-01-08 0
4 17.2 2026-01-24 through 2026-02-08 0
5 17.5 2026-01-25 through 2026-02-09 0

 

Minimum 16-Day Mean Avg Temperature 
for LAGUARDIA AIRPORT, NY
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
1 20.8 2017-12-26 through 2018-01-10 0
2 20.8 2017-12-25 through 2018-01-09 0
3 20.9 2026-01-24 through 2026-02-08 0

 

Minimum 16-Day Mean Avg Temperature 
for NEWARK LIBERTY INTL AP, NJ
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
1 19.7 2017-12-26 through 2018-01-10 0
2 19.7 2017-12-25 through 2018-01-09 0
3 20.1 2026-01-24 through 2026-02-08 0

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, EastonSN+ said:

Hoping there is enough time to reach phase 8 again before mid March....

image.png.a5da8a78627b2d4cd165fdc0e8f0a98e.png

 If I get enough time, I’ll analyze the Baltimore daily temperatures for some of the MJO phases in (post) La Niña years in March as a followup to my 20 Feb MJO La Niña MJO phase analysis. If I do, I might start with 8. I’d look at the same 20.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LakePaste25 said:

May be lingering effects, but it’s safe to say that La niña is done for. 

Regardless, it’s important for continuity/looking back that we keep most of the posts specifically pertaining to the rest of this cold season in this thread. Besides the lag of ENSO related effects, these threads are obviously about far more than ENSO, itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 The chances for an overall Feb -PNA are good as of now with a strong -PNA upcoming. This goes through Feb 24th:

IMG_8144.thumb.png.fc1a698ca3e1a488f05788d69f00fddb.png


AO now rising sharply:

IMG_8145.thumb.png.a7185accdec4c0da187bf1e8e92ef013.png
 

NAO is, like the AO, also rising. However, it remains to be seen whether or not this rise will be enough to get the DJF NAO >-0.25, the # I’ve always used to classify a winter as -NAO vs neutral. DJ is at -0.5. In order for DJF to rise above -0.25, the Feb NAO would need to end up >+0.25, which is a decent possibility per this:

IMG_8146.thumb.png.4e950a9f5aa3ffe1937ee2d2b008ba75.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, GaWx said:

 The chances for an overall Feb -PNA are good as of now with a strong -PNA upcoming. This goes through Feb 24th:

IMG_8144.thumb.png.fc1a698ca3e1a488f05788d69f00fddb.png


AO now rising sharply:

IMG_8145.thumb.png.a7185accdec4c0da187bf1e8e92ef013.png
 

NAO is, like the AO, also rising. However, it remains to be seen whether or not this rise will be enough to get the DJF NAO >-0.25, the # I’ve always used to classify a winter as -NAO vs neutral. DJ is at -0.5. In order for DJF to rise above -0.25, the Feb NAO would need to end up >+0.25, which is a decent possibility per this:

IMG_8146.thumb.png.4e950a9f5aa3ffe1937ee2d2b008ba75.png

Not looking great as of now for cold snowy for the east coast. Hope changes soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All joking aside, this has been a very dry winter and drought conditions are worsening. We are going to have big issues this spring into the summer if we don’t start getting a lot of rain. As @bluewave pointed out, the end of January snowstorm didn’t have a lot of liquid equivalent, just very good ratios with the Siberian cold that was in place, it’s not going to melt down to much…..
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-NAO rising to positive. -PNA becoming deeper. Meteorology over modelology, it shouldn't take much for us to understand that is opposite of the a good winter pattern. That's about as bad as it gets 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, NyWxGuy said:

-NAO rising to positive. -PNA becoming deeper. Meteorology over modelology, it shouldn't take much for us to understand that is opposite of the a good winter pattern. That's about as bad as it gets 

Hoping after a mild week 2 for an improvement to mainly NN in the SE late month into March!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, NyWxGuy said:

-NAO rising to positive. -PNA becoming deeper. Meteorology over modelology, it shouldn't take much for us to understand that is opposite of the a good winter pattern. That's about as bad as it gets 

The RNA is fine starting mid month as mentioned by Don. However yes we need the AO to return to negative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...