Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,509
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

July 2023 General Discussion


Spartman
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Lightning said:

I still don't get why they insist on calling it 'normal'.  It is an average (as you said).  If each day did exact what that chart showed it would be the most abnormal weather ever for the Midwest/Great Lakes.

This is actually a misconception. Not only are the values smoothed and normalized, but advanced statistical tools are employed to take it into account changes in exposure, location, and trends. For example, the 1991-2020 30-year average monthly mean for ORD in July is 74.6F; however, the 1991-2020 normal is 75.4F. The latter number is much closer to the current 15-year (2008-2022) running average of 75.3F. A "normal" July would actually be 0.8F warmer than the average from 1991-2020.

Similarly, the 1991-2020 30-year average monthly mean for CLE in July is 73.6F; however, the official 1991-2020 normal is 74.5F. The latter number is exactly even with the current 15-year (2008-2022) running average of 74.5F. A "normal" July is 0.9F warmer than a simple arithmetic mean.

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TheClimateChanger said:

This is actually a misconception. Not only are the values smoothed and normalized, but advanced statistical tools are employed to take it into account changes in exposure, location, and trends. For example, the 1991-2020 30-year average monthly mean for ORD in July is 74.6F; however, the 1991-2020 normal is 75.4F. The latter number is much closer to the current 15-year (2008-2022) running average of 75.3F. A "normal" July would actually be 0.8F warmer than the average from 1991-2020.

Similarly, the 1991-2020 30-year average monthly mean for CLE in July is 73.6F; however, the official 1991-2020 normal is 74.5F. The latter number is exactly even with the current 15-year (2008-2022) running average of 74.5F. A "normal" July is 0.9F warmer than a simple arithmetic mean.

Averages.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/4/2023 at 1:12 PM, Chicago Storm said:


Whole modem die or transmission line?


.

Sorry just saw this, FTI line from the tower to here. We still have working equipment and we can get the data by calling in on the ASOS line then we feed it into AISR, its a bit of a pain during thunderstorms but otherwise we are making due.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Stebo said:

Sorry just saw this, FTI line from the tower to here. We still have working equipment and we can get the data by calling in on the ASOS line then we feed it into AISR, its a bit of a pain during thunderstorms but otherwise we are making due.

Answers my question, too. But just in case ASOS goes belly up, do you have equipment to use for manual obs? Hand held devices maybe? Back in my Army days, we used a hand held anenometer, a psychrometer for dry/wet bulb (twirl that for a minute or so), and a rather large barometer. Of course that's old school. It's all digital stuff now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Brian D said:

Answers my question, too. But just in case ASOS goes belly up, do you have equipment to use for manual obs? Hand held devices maybe? Back in my Army days, we used a hand held anenometer, a psychrometer for dry/wet bulb (twirl that for a minute or so), and a rather large barometer. Of course that's old school. It's all digital stuff now.

Stebo after the ASOS craps out.

 

Screenshot_20230709_105823_Google.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, hawkeye_wx said:

Models are strongly suggesting an MCS will form in NE/SD Tuesday and track east-southeast through Wednesday.

Models are now tracking the MCS farther south, potentially leaving my area dry again, because of course they are.  :gun_bandana:... and this might be it for another week or two.

  • Sad 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Brian D said:

Yeah, they don't tell you the nature of the weather that created them.

I remember living in Seattle where the pattern is extremely bimodal in early summer.  In June you get a lot of cloudy days where it barely gets above 60, then you get some offshore flow to burn off the stratus and you have a stretch of 80s.  The average high is dead smack in the middle, but "average" days aren't the norm at all.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/8/2023 at 3:40 PM, Brian D said:

Prelim data for June showing another warm one for our region. Since 2005, June's have been running near avg to well above. 5 & 10 yr trend charts shown respectively.

Midwest June anom 5yr tr.gif

Midwest June anom 10yr tr.gif

What data are used to generate these? June 1856 was not the warmest June on record in the Great Lakes. That is incorrect.

Smithsonian records have mean temperatures of 68.0F at Chicago, 70.7F at Detroit, and 70.6F at Cleveland - and these are based on tri-daily measurements, which have a warm bias compared to the average of the maximum and minimum - particularly pervasive in early summer, when 7 am local solar time is hours after sunrise. That is not even close to years like 1919, 2005, 1933, and 1934. That has to be wrong.

The more recent data looks similar to official government statistics, except that the most recent years appear to have been systematically cooled relative to the past - which makes little sense, considering most of the biases in the earlier data would result in a warming bias.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Brian D said:

Answers my question, too. But just in case ASOS goes belly up, do you have equipment to use for manual obs? Hand held devices maybe? Back in my Army days, we used a hand held anenometer, a psychrometer for dry/wet bulb (twirl that for a minute or so), and a rather large barometer. Of course that's old school. It's all digital stuff now.

We have some handheld backup stuff and some information from the tower itself. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, TheClimateChanger said:

What data are used to generate these? June 1856 was not the warmest June on record in the Great Lakes. That is incorrect.

Smithsonian records have mean temperatures of 68.0F at Chicago, 70.7F at Detroit, and 70.6F at Cleveland - and these are based on tri-daily measurements, which have a warm bias compared to the average of the maximum and minimum - particularly pervasive in early summer, when 7 am local solar time is hours after sunrise. That is not even close to years like 1919, 2005, 1933, and 1934. That has to be wrong.

The more recent data looks similar to official government statistics, except that the most recent years appear to have been systematically cooled relative to the past - which makes little sense, considering most of the biases in the earlier data would result in a warming bias.

It's "milk plant" data from an avg of datasets. Raw from the "teet" stuff gets processed, and some are reanalysis sets. Data is quite variable during the 1800's, although the datasets start becoming more close in the late 1800's. It is what it is. I don't do my own evals on what was done. It's an estimation, and if there happens to be a year that's off, not much I can do about it. 

 

Edit: Just looked at the datasets anoms for June. They range from 1.3 - 4.6 (1901-2000 baseline). This is not uncommon with these datasets to have this kind of variability between them for the 1800's as I mentioned above. "Milk plant" effect I guess.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Storms rolled through last night. Nice lightning show for a little while. Couple close hits. 0.34" of rain. 0.84" for the month so far. 

4.10" since May 1st is well behind normal by 4.71" as of today July 10. June, and July are the peak of precip season around here, so we need to step up, or get left behind in the coming weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, frostfern said:

Next 10 days looks wet now, possibly really wet if the next cutoff stalls in the right place, but no heat or high CAPE IMBY for a long time.  Still boring for summer, but better than drought and smoke.

Not trying to belittle or make light the events in Vermont.  But I would love to get widespread 4-8" rain totals like that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Brian D said:

It's "milk plant" data from an avg of datasets. Raw from the "teet" stuff gets processed, and some are reanalysis sets. Data is quite variable during the 1800's, although the datasets start becoming more close in the late 1800's. It is what it is. I don't do my own evals on what was done. It's an estimation, and if there happens to be a year that's off, not much I can do about it. 

 

Edit: Just looked at the datasets anoms for June. They range from 1.3 - 4.6 (1901-2000 baseline). This is not uncommon with these datasets to have this kind of variability between them for the 1800's as I mentioned above. "Milk plant" effect I guess.

Interesting. Here is my best guess for the lower Great Lakes, using 7 reference sites. Data before 1860 is limited, and subject to larger deviation from actual.

Edit: Corrected error in data for 1857 and added 8th reference site.

image.thumb.png.00dbec642e7a3c624b3e8ee786dbb36a.png

Top 5 Coldest: 1. 1842; 2. 1862; 3. 1839; 4. 1903; 5T. 1834; 5T. 1857

Top 5 Warmest: 1. 1949; 2. 1919; 3. 2005; 4T. 2021; 4T. 1933

Comparing to NCEI rankings for 1895-present only:

Top 5 Coldest: 1. 1903; 2. 1926; 3T. 1927, 1916, and 1928

Top 5 Warmest: 1. 1949; 2. 1919; 3. 2005; 4T. 2021; 4T. 1933

For the entire Great Lakes basin, NCEI has:

Top 5 Coldest: 1T. 1916 & 1926; 3. 1958; 4. 1928; 5T. 1915, 1917 & 1982 

1903 is 8th coldest and 1927 is 9th coldest. My dataset has 1958 and 1982 tied for 6th coldest since 1895, and 1917 & 1915 tied for 11th coldest since 1895. Some variation, but this my dataset covers only a subset of the full GL basin.

Top 5 Warmest: 1T. 1919 & 2005; 3. 1933; 4. 1949; 5. 2021

All match, except for order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, TheClimateChanger said:

Interesting. Here is my best guess for the lower Great Lakes, using 7 reference sites. Data before 1860 is limited, and subject to larger deviation from actual.

image.thumb.png.d03ae8825718de12b157f0f9e9f45697.png

Top 5 Coldest: 1842, 1837, 1862, 1839, and 1903

Top 5 Warmest: 1949, 1919, 2005, 2021, and 1933

Do you really believe anything pre 1860s?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...