Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,514
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    CHSVol
    Newest Member
    CHSVol
    Joined

2023-2024 Winter/ENSO Disco


40/70 Benchmark
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 7/16/2023 at 1:57 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Paul loves using analogs from the civil war era.

The forcing is heavily skewed west compared to strong Nino east based years thanks to Pacific warm pool

If this Nino is strong and tilted east it still won't play out like 97-98 or other similar years. Bluewave broke that down nicely in the Nino discussion thread. 

So I don't think the typical caveats where a strong east based Nino means winter is dead will apply. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, SnoSki14 said:

The forcing is heavily skewed west compared to strong Nino east based years thanks to Pacific warm pool

If this Nino is strong and tilted east it still won't play out like 97-98 or other similar years. Bluewave broke that down nicely in the Nino discussion thread. 

So I don't think the typical caveats where a strong east based Nino means winter is dead will apply. 

I agree....been trying to explain that to snowman, who apparently doesn't think that the location of the tropical convection is important due to a warmer climate. One of my largest mistakes in the past was focusing only on the ENSO region, but I now realize that the entire equatorial Pacific is crucial unless the significant anomalies are relegated to just the ENSO region.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I agree....been trying to explain that to snowman, who apparently doesn't think that the location of the tropical convection is important due to a warmer climate. One of my largest mistakes in the past was focusing only on the ENSO region, but I now realize that the entire equatorial Pacific is crucial unless the significant anomalies are relegated to just the ENSO region.

Location of tropical convection is important no matter what. Not sure how that is debatable. It's the reason why we had the winters of 13-14 and 14-15 despite some different ENSO regimes. It wasn't because the waters surrounding a pod of Orca's were 45F instead of 41F. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking of tropical forcing, I recently (maybe a month or so ago) did some breakdowns of tropical forcing during EL Nino winter's. I focused on Outgoing Longwave Radiation Anomalies as that was the only product that had reanalysis data back to 1900. What I did was look at OLR Anomalies for each EL Nino event to see the different variations. I also used this diagram as guidance:

image.thumb.png.5f6537f286b36c2301fffc787ae7ca8e.png

During ENSO neutral conditions and La Nina's the tropical forcing is typically located across the far western Pacific and during EL Nino's this is typically displaced farther east, either towards the central Pacific or into the eastern Pacific. When I was making my OLR composites, I noticed there was a definite variation between each event where the tropical forcing was mostly located. 

Based on the composites and the above diagram, I split the forcing's into two categories 

1. Neutral ENSO Forcing EL Nino Winter's (meaning the tropical forcing as evident by the OLR anomalies) was located within the western Pacific (more typical of an ENSO neutral) 

2. EL Nino Forcing EL Nino Winter's (meaning the tropical forcing as evident by the OLR anomalies) was displaced farther east across the Pacific (more typical of an EL Nino episode). 

What I found interesting was there was actually slightly more EL Nino events with tropical forcing more prevalent across the western Pacific than there were EL Nino events were the tropical forcing was displaced east. Now obviously, the tropical forcing's more west were mostly weak and moderate events and the tropical forcing's displaced east were stronger events. 

Here is a breakdown of the years 

image.png.c5cb47b392d053577bfa9ce73c66a554.png

Neutral ENSO Forcing EL Nino Winter's:

1093300684_AllNeutralENSOForcingELNinoWinter(DJFM)OLRAnomalies.gif.33248f934cbc014602c6101058623def.gif1450008875_AllNeutralENSOForcingELNinoWInter(DJFM)500mbHeightAnomalies.gif.4857e982f1a6fb705c1f9a6a7f7f6495.gif

EL Nino Forcing EL Nino Winter's

1143480374_AllELNinoForcingELNinoWinter(DJFM)OLRAnomalies.gif.19246f5cf7659f6e2d1330b61fcec3fd.gif

1058265328_AllELNinoForcingELNinoWinter(DJFM)500mbHeightAnomalies.gif.773d473ad153d1109c89611b03c4117f.gif

Now...I JUST realized I am an idiot. I am only going ahead with this post because I took the time to make it up and there is something still noteworthy. 

Anyways my breakdowns here are TOTAL GARBAGE. I was focusing on the WRONG area for the Neutral/LA Nina Forcing. That focus should be centered near 120°E I was focusing more on 150°E. 

Overlooking this stupidity, like Scott said the placement and location of tropical forcing is extremely important. It would be difficult to interpret with my incorrect composites here but there is a clear signal that the more east the tropical forcing is, the more likely the east is to have an above-average temperature winter and the more west the tropical forcing is, the more likely the east is to have a below-average temperature winter. 

What is also very clear I think is the configuration of anomalies associated with the Siberian High and Aleutian Low is also extremely, extremely critical, especially during winters where the Aleutian Low is of a stronger signal. 

Well going to go back and re-do these composites now that I realized the dumb mistake. I guess if any good came at making this post is I was able to catch this error. I have a print out of the first graphic showing the forcing's for each episode and I was looking at my ENSO OLR composites and something like jumped at me. So I quickly made some OR composites for La Nina episodes and realized I was assessing the wrong area of the equatorial Pacific :axe: :axe: :axe: 

Anyways I am definitely not throwing out the idea of a solid winter just because of "strength" concern. 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, weatherwiz said:

Speaking of tropical forcing, I recently (maybe a month or so ago) did some breakdowns of tropical forcing during EL Nino winter's. I focused on Outgoing Longwave Radiation Anomalies as that was the only product that had reanalysis data back to 1900. What I did was look at OLR Anomalies for each EL Nino event to see the different variations. I also used this diagram as guidance:

image.thumb.png.5f6537f286b36c2301fffc787ae7ca8e.png

During ENSO neutral conditions and La Nina's the tropical forcing is typically located across the far western Pacific and during EL Nino's this is typically displaced farther east, either towards the central Pacific or into the eastern Pacific. When I was making my OLR composites, I noticed there was a definite variation between each event where the tropical forcing was mostly located. 

Based on the composites and the above diagram, I split the forcing's into two categories 

1. Neutral ENSO Forcing EL Nino Winter's (meaning the tropical forcing as evident by the OLR anomalies) was located within the western Pacific (more typical of an ENSO neutral) 

2. EL Nino Forcing EL Nino Winter's (meaning the tropical forcing as evident by the OLR anomalies) was displaced farther east across the Pacific (more typical of an EL Nino episode). 

What I found interesting was there was actually slightly more EL Nino events with tropical forcing more prevalent across the western Pacific than there were EL Nino events were the tropical forcing was displaced east. Now obviously, the tropical forcing's more west were mostly weak and moderate events and the tropical forcing's displaced east were stronger events. 

Here is a breakdown of the years 

image.png.c5cb47b392d053577bfa9ce73c66a554.png

Neutral ENSO Forcing EL Nino Winter's:

1093300684_AllNeutralENSOForcingELNinoWinter(DJFM)OLRAnomalies.gif.33248f934cbc014602c6101058623def.gif1450008875_AllNeutralENSOForcingELNinoWInter(DJFM)500mbHeightAnomalies.gif.4857e982f1a6fb705c1f9a6a7f7f6495.gif

EL Nino Forcing EL Nino Winter's

1143480374_AllELNinoForcingELNinoWinter(DJFM)OLRAnomalies.gif.19246f5cf7659f6e2d1330b61fcec3fd.gif

1058265328_AllELNinoForcingELNinoWinter(DJFM)500mbHeightAnomalies.gif.773d473ad153d1109c89611b03c4117f.gif

Now...I JUST realized I am an idiot. I am only going ahead with this post because I took the time to make it up and there is something still noteworthy. 

Anyways my breakdowns here are TOTAL GARBAGE. I was focusing on the WRONG area for the Neutral/LA Nina Forcing. That focus should be centered near 120°E I was focusing more on 150°E. 

Overlooking this stupidity, like Scott said the placement and location of tropical forcing is extremely important. It would be difficult to interpret with my incorrect composites here but there is a clear signal that the more east the tropical forcing is, the more likely the east is to have an above-average temperature winter and the more west the tropical forcing is, the more likely the east is to have a below-average temperature winter. 

What is also very clear I think is the configuration of anomalies associated with the Siberian High and Aleutian Low is also extremely, extremely critical, especially during winters where the Aleutian Low is of a stronger signal. 

Well going to go back and re-do these composites now that I realized the dumb mistake. I guess if any good came at making this post is I was able to catch this error. I have a print out of the first graphic showing the forcing's for each episode and I was looking at my ENSO OLR composites and something like jumped at me. So I quickly made some OR composites for La Nina episodes and realized I was assessing the wrong area of the equatorial Pacific :axe: :axe: :axe: 

Anyways I am definitely not throwing out the idea of a solid winter just because of "strength" concern. 

Imagine if Tolstoy had done that at the end of War and Peace?

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, weatherwiz said:

Speaking of tropical forcing, I recently (maybe a month or so ago) did some breakdowns of tropical forcing during EL Nino winter's. I focused on Outgoing Longwave Radiation Anomalies as that was the only product that had reanalysis data back to 1900. What I did was look at OLR Anomalies for each EL Nino event to see the different variations. I also used this diagram as guidance:

image.thumb.png.5f6537f286b36c2301fffc787ae7ca8e.png

During ENSO neutral conditions and La Nina's the tropical forcing is typically located across the far western Pacific and during EL Nino's this is typically displaced farther east, either towards the central Pacific or into the eastern Pacific. When I was making my OLR composites, I noticed there was a definite variation between each event where the tropical forcing was mostly located. 

Based on the composites and the above diagram, I split the forcing's into two categories 

1. Neutral ENSO Forcing EL Nino Winter's (meaning the tropical forcing as evident by the OLR anomalies) was located within the western Pacific (more typical of an ENSO neutral) 

2. EL Nino Forcing EL Nino Winter's (meaning the tropical forcing as evident by the OLR anomalies) was displaced farther east across the Pacific (more typical of an EL Nino episode). 

What I found interesting was there was actually slightly more EL Nino events with tropical forcing more prevalent across the western Pacific than there were EL Nino events were the tropical forcing was displaced east. Now obviously, the tropical forcing's more west were mostly weak and moderate events and the tropical forcing's displaced east were stronger events. 

Here is a breakdown of the years 

image.png.c5cb47b392d053577bfa9ce73c66a554.png

Neutral ENSO Forcing EL Nino Winter's:

1093300684_AllNeutralENSOForcingELNinoWinter(DJFM)OLRAnomalies.gif.33248f934cbc014602c6101058623def.gif1450008875_AllNeutralENSOForcingELNinoWInter(DJFM)500mbHeightAnomalies.gif.4857e982f1a6fb705c1f9a6a7f7f6495.gif

EL Nino Forcing EL Nino Winter's

1143480374_AllELNinoForcingELNinoWinter(DJFM)OLRAnomalies.gif.19246f5cf7659f6e2d1330b61fcec3fd.gif

1058265328_AllELNinoForcingELNinoWinter(DJFM)500mbHeightAnomalies.gif.773d473ad153d1109c89611b03c4117f.gif

Now...I JUST realized I am an idiot. I am only going ahead with this post because I took the time to make it up and there is something still noteworthy. 

Anyways my breakdowns here are TOTAL GARBAGE. I was focusing on the WRONG area for the Neutral/LA Nina Forcing. That focus should be centered near 120°E I was focusing more on 150°E. 

Overlooking this stupidity, like Scott said the placement and location of tropical forcing is extremely important. It would be difficult to interpret with my incorrect composites here but there is a clear signal that the more east the tropical forcing is, the more likely the east is to have an above-average temperature winter and the more west the tropical forcing is, the more likely the east is to have a below-average temperature winter. 

What is also very clear I think is the configuration of anomalies associated with the Siberian High and Aleutian Low is also extremely, extremely critical, especially during winters where the Aleutian Low is of a stronger signal

Well going to go back and re-do these composites now that I realized the dumb mistake. I guess if any good came at making this post is I was able to catch this error. I have a print out of the first graphic showing the forcing's for each episode and I was looking at my ENSO OLR composites and something like jumped at me. So I quickly made some OR composites for La Nina episodes and realized I was assessing the wrong area of the equatorial Pacific :axe: :axe: :axe: 

Anyways I am definitely not throwing out the idea of a solid winter just because of "strength" concern. 

During the stronger, canonical events, the Aleutian low is very prominent and tucked in tight to the coast of the PNW, so that there is a stronger PAC jet....during the weaker events that are focused more to the west, that low is more meager and further off of the coast.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
41 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said:

interesting thing is that the CanSIPS did increase the strength of the Nino considerably to just barely super, but it doesn't matter since the forcing is so west based. we basically get Modoki forcing with a basin-wide Nino. kinda wild

cansips_sstaMean_noice_month_global_fh6_trend.thumb.gif.efd0c7c0dffc77d3859c8e9397eedde2.gifcansips_chi200Mean_month_global_fh6_trend.thumb.gif.d8d205a7a153a791b2d5fb5f0271ee99.gifcansips_z500aMean_month_namer_fh7_trend.thumb.gif.3c7fc1b7d2204565665b7b59591b4942.gif

Yeah definitely interesting. I hope it holds.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, George001 said:

Strongly agree, I would rather not see DC, Philly, and NYC get buried while we get skunked.

I would take my chances with a 09-10 redux anytime!  Knowing how very slight shifts in a pattern like that could easily produce a big SNE winter, I'd roll the dice!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FXWX said:

I would take my chances with a 09-10 redux anytime!  Knowing how very slight shifts in a pattern like that could easily produce a big SNE winter, I'd roll the dice!

 

1 hour ago, CoastalWx said:

Violently agree 

I knew you guys would say this…and obviously that is true, but lately(especially this past winter)we’ve had zero things go our way.  I know, I know, the law of averages eventually swing the other way. But just a tad less blocking than 09-10 is a safer bet imo…cuz that winter nothing could get up here whatsoever.  I don’t even want to gamble with something that has that level of blocking again…if I had a choice lol.   

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, WinterWolf said:

 

I knew you guys would say this…and obviously that is true, but lately(especially this past winter)we’ve had zero things go our way.  I know, I know, the law of averages eventually swing the other way. But just a tad less blocking than 09-10 is a safer bet imo…cuz that winter nothing could get up here whatsoever.  I don’t even want to gamble with something that has that level of blocking again…if I had a choice lol.   

Yea...ideally, we would want a bit less blocking, but I would still take my chances with that level of blocking again....it always comes down to luck in the end, regardless of the pattern...just that the deck is more stacked in your favor in certain set ups.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, brooklynwx99 said:

interesting thing is that the CanSIPS did increase the strength of the Nino considerably to just barely super, but it doesn't matter since the forcing is so west based. we basically get Modoki forcing with a basin-wide Nino. kinda wild

cansips_sstaMean_noice_month_global_fh6_trend.thumb.gif.efd0c7c0dffc77d3859c8e9397eedde2.gifcansips_chi200Mean_month_global_fh6_trend.thumb.gif.d8d205a7a153a791b2d5fb5f0271ee99.gifcansips_z500aMean_month_namer_fh7_trend.thumb.gif.3c7fc1b7d2204565665b7b59591b4942.gif

Its true that its all about the forcing, but 2015 showed us that you still don't want it too strong...saving grace is that I don't think that this event will be as a prominent a driver as that event was given the ambient hemispheric environment, regardless of the ONI, which is what the MEI and RONI illustrate. An apt analogy is to think of the ONI in terms of barometric pressure.....people focus too much on the minimum central pressure with respect to both the tropics and mid latitude cyclones, but what really matters is the pressure gradient...ie the interaction with the ambient environment, which is what truly dictates the weather.

ONI is analogous to minimum central pressure within this context....but we need to look around the globe and well beyond the tropics in order to truly ascertain how the weather will play out because that hemispheric gradient is what dictates everything. Period.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weather is the product of gradients, not static measurements...remember that. We only care about the anomalous numbers due to their correlation with the stronger gradients and the fact that they look pretty in our dorky record books, but in and of themselves, they are pretty useless.....powerful shortwaves with no baroclinicity, so to speak.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Go Kart Mozart said:

All this optimism on an unusually brisk August morning is awesome!

Think about it...what happens when you get a 498mb closed ULL pass under LI in the absence of any thermal gradient or baroclinicity? Well, once everyone finishes toweling themselves off, they realize that the forecast is for snow showers, which disappoints everyone, but Steve and Kevin.

Right now, this el nino looks like a huge closed low without much baroclinicity to me...snowman23 is the one that will need to come to grip with reality once he towels himself off-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since gradients exists with every atmospheric phenomenon, including air pressure and SSTs, you can think of the ENSO ONI like the low pressure off of the east coast and the SSTS over the west PAC like the high pressure over the mid west...same type of system. Well, given that this is an el nino, the high ONI is analogous to a deep area of low pressure off of the east coast. But we would want to see lower SSTS over the west PAC to have a really strong SYSTEM, just like we would a strong high pressure over the mid west. But this year, we have a weak high (warm W PAC SSTS), so the gradient isn't there. Its like having the impressive 961mb low (ONI) with a paltry 1000mb high.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Think about it...what happens when you get a 498mb closed ULL pass under LI in the absence of any thermal gradient or baroclinicity? Well, once everyone finishes toweling themselves off, they realize that the forecast is for snow showers, which disappoints everyone, but Steve and Kevin.

Right now, this el nino looks like a huge closed low without much baroclinicity to me...snowman23 is the one that will need to come to grip with reality once he towels himself off-

Can't remember the last time a 498 passing under LI didn't produce. That's a 6 plus guarantee.  Link me up with an example 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...