Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Widespread Snow Potential January 16th to January 18th


sferic
 Share

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, wolfie09 said:

Nws doesn't seem impressed. 

 

Again...the bitter cold
airmass will generate some light lake snows south of Lake Ontario
with very minimal accumulations. The snow will be less able to accum
to any degree being in the form of needles and thin plates rather
than fluffy dendrites.

They also mention dry air. Which is always a problem for us with N winds. These can surprise tho. 2-4”?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tombo82685 said:

Soundings look supportive of snow. Color scheme looks like sleet

Color scheme looks backwards actually... the scale shows darker to lighter pinkpurple for lighter to heavier snow but it literally looks backwards... lol

I'll be in your neck of the woods this weekend, maybe we get some of that band ???:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, tombo82685 said:

Right now I would say rochester area has best shot at 15"+ as they get the northerly to northeasterly flow off Ontario to enhance snowfall. This is assuming no other adjustments are made in tracks 

 Not sure you'll see much lake enhancement during the storm.. maybe at the very end....

...

The " No pulse recorded band"  you see depicted on the models, is basically basically an occluded front from the old primary, where the deformation band forms....ie...mid levels...

 You won't have a ton of instability at the lowest levels with 850 millibar temperatures only -4 at best...

 Until we can sample that kicker impulse over the Pacific better, (like tonight and tomorrow's runs), we could potentially see some significant changes, especially in the mid level set up.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LakeEffectKing said:

 Not sure you'll see much lake enhancement during the storm.. maybe at the very end....

...

The " No pulse recorded band"  you see depicted on the models, is basically basically an occluded front from the old primary, where the deformation band forms....ie...mid levels...

 You won't have a ton of instability at the lowest levels with 850 millibar temperatures only -4 at best...

 Until we can sample that kicker impulse over the Pacific better, (like tonight and tomorrow's runs), we could potentially see some significant changes, especially in the mid level set up.

I saw a piece about this recently. Apparently the hurricane hunters have been sampling it. They happen to be doing research in the pacific and are doing run throughs. 
I have no idea how accurate this is but the poster acted certain that this was already happening and that the info was being absorbed into the models. Obviously, having the parts on shore will be best. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, wolfie09 said:

Tt shows snow but 850s are +0C..Both the algorithm and the model sucks, wouldn't worry about it to much lol

rgem_T850_neus_76 (1).png

Its orange on wxbell. And the 850 t on the sound is above freezing. I like the rdps a great deal as a model but this is far outside its normal range. I like to use it more like the NAM...mostly only within 48 h. 

 

rgem-all-ontario-instant_ptype_3hr-2410000.png

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...