Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,509
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

COVID-19 Talk


mappy
 Share

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, 40westwx said:

Again.. during 2017-2018 there were approximately 80,000 people that died in the US from the flu.. but this is confirmed laboratory tests. During those years at the height of the outbreak, there were on average 12,000 more deaths PER WEEK than the same weeks in previous years.  

Thats  huge number.. a crazy anomaly... and the only difference that year was the flu outbreak.  So you can safely assume that over at least 80,000 more peopled died from flu that year.  i have tables graphs and sources to back this up.

And most of those deaths were in Florida or California.  They were this year's New York.. 

But we will never know the true severity of COVID-19 because  Social Distancing is interrupting the natural process by lengthening the time in which the virus sticks around in a given population.  

This is not true.  The number of lab confirmed flu deaths is much less than the estimated death toll each year.  There weren't 80,000 lab confirmed flu deaths in the 2017-18 flu season.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Maestrobjwa said:

Wait...you think the national death toll for the entire country will decline to 100  much by then? But how...unless we see the new infections go down quite a bit between now and the end of the month, I don't know how we get there that fast.

I suppose the NYC metro area may be the exception, but i do think 100 deaths or less a day for the rest of the country is a real possibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DCTeacherman said:

History Professor: And tragically class, over 58,000 Americans died in the Vietnam war. 

Student: *raises hand*

History Professor: Yes, you in the back, go ahead...

Student: That’s no big deal because 60,000 people died of flu last year. 

No one is saying that 60,000 people dying is “not a big deal”.  But some of us are saying that we have to have some perspective.  People die from things all the time.  And it’s always sad in my opinion.  After predictions of over 2 million American deaths.  We are now debating if it will reach 60,000 in the next few weeks.  That is a tragedy and we can mourn the lives that have been and will be lost.  But i would argue that if we had 100,000s of deaths at this point, the cries to return to normal would be far weaker and far fewer. But people were told something that didn’t pan out.  We can argue whether it was social distancing, lock downs, warm weather, end of cold and flu season as to why we did so much better than predicted.  But the bottom line is people are starting react to real numbers and hard data vs predictions and models.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SnowGolfBro said:

No one is saying that 60,000 people dying is “not a big deal”.  But some of us are saying that we have to have some perspective.  People die from things all the time.  And it’s always sad in my opinion.  After predictions of over 2 million American deaths.  We are now debating if it will reach 60,000 in the next few weeks.  That is a tragedy and we can mourn the lives that have been and will be lost.  But i would argue that if we had 100,000s of deaths at this point, the cries to return to normal would be far weaker and far fewer. But people were told something that didn’t pan out.  We can argue whether it was social distancing, lock downs, warm weather, end of cold and flu season as to why we did so much better than predicted.  But the bottom line is people are starting react to real numbers and hard data vs predictions and models.

It didn't pan out because we isolated.

 

This thing is still killing 2,500 a day. Think of how long we've been like this for and consider that. It's still resulting in 30k new infections a day minimum. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, supernovasky said:

It didn't pan out because we isolated.

 

This thing is still killing 2,500 a day. Think of how long we've been like this for and consider that. It's still resulting in 30k new infections a day minimum. 

Keep telling yourself that ... we are getting super close to losing support for lock-downs worldwide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SnowGolfBro said:

No one is saying that 60,000 people dying is “not a big deal”.  But some of us are saying that we have to have some perspective.  People die from things all the time.  And it’s always sad in my opinion.  After predictions of over 2 million American deaths.  We are now debating if it will reach 60,000 in the next few weeks.  That is a tragedy and we can mourn the lives that have been and will be lost.  But i would argue that if we had 100,000s of deaths at this point, the cries to return to normal would be far weaker and far fewer. But people were told something that didn’t pan out.  We can argue whether it was social distancing, lock downs, warm weather, end of cold and flu season as to why we did so much better than predicted.  But the bottom line is people are starting react to real numbers and hard data vs predictions and models.

The models continually adjust to real time data, and factored into the projections are continuation of the measures that are in place for specific time periods, including stay at home orders and general social distancing. I am sure you know this, but there are "suggestions" in this post to the contrary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, supernovasky said:

I do believe the collective will is breaking.

 

I don't think that the results will be good. I hope and pray they are.

They will rush out to restart the industrial machine at huge costs in terms of human lives and suffering. I am familiar with this theme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, supernovasky said:

Holy crap 2500 deaths. Several states haven't reported either yet.

Imagine unrestrained for significant amounts of time. "just the flu"

 

I think at PEAK in 2018 flu killed 500/day, and that only lasted a few days. And that was the worst flu season in 40 years.

So probably another case where low weekend fatality rates were a bit of a mirage. Or backlogs and probable deaths are getting added today? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WxUSAF said:

So probably another case where low weekend fatality rates were a bit of a mirage. Or backlogs and probable deaths are getting added today? 

I've looked at the data. I do think backlogs have to do with it for sure (Sunday deaths end up pushed to Monday and Tuesday), probable is contributing some, but I think the biggest driver is that other places are experiencing peaks right now. Ohio is seeing a pretty strong uptick in hospitalizations and deaths. Pennsylvnaia, Michigan, Illinois, New Jersey, Connecticut are all getting slammed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, supernovasky said:

I do believe the collective will is breaking.

 

I don't think that the results will be good. I hope and pray they are.

Most states have a criteria for when to begin the stepwise process for "reopening". In MD and probably VA as well, it will likely begin around June 1, IMO. That is based on the current data and modeled projections, and hopefully adequate testing resources.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, supernovasky said:

I've looked at the data. I do think backlogs have to do with it for sure (Sunday deaths end up pushed to Monday and Tuesday), probable is contributing some, but I think the biggest driver is that other places are experiencing peaks right now. Ohio is seeing a pretty strong uptick in hospitalizations and deaths. Pennsylvnaia, Michigan, Illinois, New Jersey, Connecticut are all getting slammed.

Maryland is another looming hotspot. It's been building for awhile. You guys did good but nothing can stop this thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, supernovasky said:

I've looked at the data. I do think backlogs have to do with it for sure (Sunday deaths end up pushed to Monday and Tuesday), probable is contributing some, but I think the biggest driver is that other places are experiencing peaks right now. Ohio is seeing a pretty strong uptick in hospitalizations and deaths. Pennsylvnaia, Michigan, Illinois, New Jersey, Connecticut are all getting slammed.

Dang...I mean it seems like with New Jersey has really been taking it on the nose with no real abatement, smh (and they got bad when NY did, didn't they?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, leesburg 04 said:

Fall and winter should suck with wave two AND flu season. It better f'n snow

I am more worried about dead trees (from freeze) and empty beaches. We know winter is like our old summers now. Such is the way of life.

What do you think winter will look like after a summer of diminished aerosols? Not only that GHGs and water vapors are at record levels already.

:axe:

Most would agree that we are leaving a distinct cultural and climactic era behind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, C.A.P.E. said:

The models continually adjust to real time data, and factored into the projections are continuation of the measures that are in place for specific time periods, including stay at home orders and general social distancing. I am sure you know this, but there are "suggestions" in this post to the contrary.

I know this.  But you have got to cut some people some slack.  A lot of good people made a ton of sacrifices for others over the last month and half.  I think people can hold out another week or two but beyond that we need to start opening up minus the hotspots we have discussed.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • mappy locked this topic
  • mappy unlocked this topic
  • WxUSAF locked and unpinned this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...