Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,507
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    SnowHabit
    Newest Member
    SnowHabit
    Joined

Fear and loathing April, 2020 discussion, obs, and the occasional derailment


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, HimoorWx said:

1.14 just since midnight.  Mud season is off to a great start.

It's weird. We melted the pack in mid March and actually dried out for a couple of days. I was hoping we ended mud season early. Now it's back with a vengeance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's exactly where I was. Those two houses had work done after March 2018. I believe the one on the right is new...can see the pilings it is on. There was a house next to that contemporary looking structure on the left, but that was destroyed in March 2018. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

That's exactly where I was. Those two houses had work done after March 2018. I believe the one on the right is new...can see the pilings it is on. There was a house next to that contemporary looking structure on the left, but that was destroyed in March 2018. 

Rebuilt with government loans no doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

That's exactly where I was. Those two houses had work done after March 2018. I believe the one on the right is new...can see the pilings it is on. There was a house next to that contemporary looking structure on the left, but that was destroyed in March 2018. 

That was in fact Eweather 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said:

High wind warning for Cape and islands

I'm trying to see how my correlations at PWM/GYX work outside our local area, but they would suggest peak gusts around 45 knots for the Cape based on the 12z NAM. 

Really have to get the 925 winds over 60 knots to give HWW a real chance, especially in a stable environment. These NE flow events tend to have deeper boundary layers though, with steeper low level lapse rates. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OceanStWx said:

I'm trying to see how my correlations at PWM/GYX work outside our local area, but they would suggest peak gusts around 45 knots for the Cape based on the 12z NAM. 

Really have to get the 925 winds over 60 knots to give HWW a real chance, especially in a stable environment. These NE flow events tend to have deeper boundary layers though, with steeper low level lapse rates. 

They are gusting high 60s lower 70s right now even a 81 at Truro

Screenshot_20200403-125018_Chrome.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OceanStWx said:

I'm trying to see how my correlations at PWM/GYX work outside our local area, but they would suggest peak gusts around 45 knots for the Cape based on the 12z NAM. 

Really have to get the 925 winds over 60 knots to give HWW a real chance, especially in a stable environment. These NE flow events tend to have deeper boundary layers though, with steeper low level lapse rates. 

Wind is getting about as strong as it has been, but I think the NAM has been more or less correct with the idea of not bringing in 45-50kts this way. Even though it is howling just aloft based on TDWR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ginx snewx said:

They are gusting high 60s lower 70s right now even a 81 at Truro

That's also at 115 ft elevation on an ocean facing dune it looks like. 

I see plenty of 50-55 knots on the Outer Cape though. The farther you get out on the Cape the steeper the LLLR are and the more penetrating the LLJ gets to the ground. 

I tried doing the correlation for CHH too (since they have balloons too) and let me tell you there is no correlation to wind speed and gusts really. They are just exposed from every wind direction and that really messes with the data. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I grabbed 73 events with a CHH 850 wind of 50 knots or greater. I looked at 500 m wind, 500 m lapse rates, and depth. 

The multiple regression equation eked out 0.577 correlation. So those variables barely explained half of the variance in observed wind gusts (+/- 2 hours from balloon launch) at CHH. 

So there's something else factoring in for Outer Cape wind gusts. I think my method works quite well inland though, especially for near coastal areas (gets a little squirrely in terrain when 925 depths get shallow). 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OceanStWx said:

I think I grabbed 73 events with a CHH 850 wind of 50 knots or greater. I looked at 500 m wind, 500 m lapse rates, and depth. 

The multiple regression equation eked out 0.577 correlation. So those variables barely explained half of the variance in observed wind gusts (+/- 2 hours from balloon launch) at CHH. 

So there's something else factoring in for Outer Cape wind gusts. I think my method works quite well inland though, especially for near coastal areas (gets a little squirrely in terrain when 925 depths get shallow). 

You use 850 for CHH or 925 for CHH?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

You use 850 for CHH or 925 for CHH?

I IDed events using 850 > 50 knots, and then used the 925 wind to do the multiple regression. Because honestly we're never getting the 850 wind to the surface. 

Oddly the 925 wind correlated better at PWM than the 500 mb did. I figured the closer to the ground you get the better, but not necessarily the case.

I also really need a level that models produce data for, because otherwise the regress is no good. I need something I can use to produce a forecast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, OceanStWx said:

I IDed events using 850 > 50 knots, and then used the 925 wind to do the multiple regression. Because honestly we're never getting the 850 wind to the surface. 

Oddly the 925 wind correlated better at PWM than the 500 mb did. I figured the closer to the ground you get the better, but not necessarily the case.

I also really need a level that models produce data for, because otherwise the regress is no good. I need something I can use to produce a forecast.

I wonder if other things like isallobaric components etc. help explain winds on the Cape for certain events? Either that, or models (I know nam can do this) is sometimes too stable in the boundary layer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

I wonder if other things like isallobaric components etc. help explain winds on the Cape for certain events? Either that, or models (I know nam can do this) is sometimes too stable in the boundary layer.

I can (have someone else ;)) create an AWIPS smart tool using 925 wind, LR, and depth to spit out a wind gust forecast grid. It's a lot harder to calculate pressure gradient across an area and do the same thing. So that's what made picking the variables tough. But those three variables got me to about 80% of the variance in gusts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...