Sciascia Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 Low placement is identical to 18z at 27hrs, but is weaker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted February 24, 2020 Author Share Posted February 24, 2020 Nam gonna follow recent trendsIt’s not gonna be pretty.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 4 minutes ago, Chicago Storm said: It’s not gonna be pretty. . I think it will still be plenty good on this run for Chicago. We shall see soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sciascia Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 The low placement is actually decently west of where it was on 18z, but the precip up until 36hrs just kinda died. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoalCityWxMan Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 Kind of lame precip returns on the NAM but atleast the SLP isn’t any further south/east Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted February 24, 2020 Author Share Posted February 24, 2020 The low placement is actually decently west of where it was on 18z, but the precip up until 36hrs just kinda died.Na, SLP is weaker and east.More of a diffuse area of SLP.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McHenrySnow Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 Just now, Chicago Storm said: Na, SLP is weaker and east. More of a diffuse area of SLP. . It's weaker, it's not east. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveNay Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 5 minutes ago, Sciascia said: The low placement is actually decently west of where it was on 18z, but the precip up until 36hrs just kinda died. 2 minutes ago, CoalCityWxMan said: Kind of lame precip returns on the NAM but atleast the SLP isn’t any further south/east 1 minute ago, Chicago Storm said: Na, SLP is weaker and east. Models aren't the only thing lacking consensus around here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanDe680 Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 No nam images. Must be bad looking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mimillman Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 It’s a fine run for northern IL but the bleeding needs to stop on this suite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted February 24, 2020 Author Share Posted February 24, 2020 No nam images. Must be bad looking. Still coming in, but only 1-4” by Wed evening is not good.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McHenrySnow Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 Just now, RyanDe680 said: No nam images. Must be bad looking. Disgusting. Compared to 12z - it's insane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 1 minute ago, RyanDe680 said: No nam images. Must be bad looking. The back and forth about slp changes hiding the fact that it's still going to be a pound town run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sciascia Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 2 minutes ago, RyanDe680 said: No nam images. Must be bad looking. Here’s at 51hrs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveNay Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 1 minute ago, McHenrySnow said: Disgusting. Compared to 12z - it's insane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sciascia Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 Alek’s area hits the over on his 5.5” call and ORD gets at least 6 inches on this run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawkeye_wx Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 Through the 12z run, a solid surface low was shown lifting north into northern Illinois. As the phasing has faded/delayed, that low is gone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mississaugasnow Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 Somehow Toronto-Hamilton has the snow magnet turned on and its the worst year to have the snow magnet haha. Looks like another 2-4" sloppy wet snow that will slow traffic a bit and pad the stats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sciascia Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 8 inches for Alek & 8.5 for ORD by 60hrs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 1 minute ago, mississaugasnow said: Somehow Toronto-Hamilton has the snow magnet turned on and its the worst year to have the snow magnet haha. Looks like another 2-4" sloppy wet snow that will slow traffic a bit and pad the stats. Trends the last 12 -18 hours have been good but still a lot of work to be done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sciascia Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 9 minutes ago, Hoosier said: The back and forth about slp changes hiding the fact that it's still going to be a pound town run. Hmm, good call Hoosier. EDIT: ORD nets a foot of snow on this NAM run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanDe680 Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 Oh man. 7 minutes ago, DaveNay said: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchaumburgStormer Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 9 minutes ago, DaveNay said: What a dumpster fire Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madwx Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 from 11.1" to 0.7" in 2 runs of the NAM. Pretty impressive I must say Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sciascia Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyclone77 Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 00z NAM actually decently better for here/QC than the 18z was. Things are looking up lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoalCityWxMan Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 Not a bad run for N IL by any means. I think just about anyone around these parts will take that, could be better but could be a lot worse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madwx Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 Some areas with Winter Storm Watches in Wisconsin get 0 snow with the 0z NAM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mimillman Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 Seems things get going later on this run and it’s still fire Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cary67 Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 1 minute ago, Sciascia said: Is the NAM slowing this event down? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.