Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,509
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Central PA - Winter 2018-19


pasnownut
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Superstorm said:


Nope.


.

 

Just now, Itstrainingtime said:

Nope...

Exactly the answer everybody knew. So, Horst is then issuing a prediction based off of climatology and not forecast guidance. 

I got interrupted by an Amber Alert last night, but it sounded like Joe Calhoun at WGAL was giving a similar opinion to that of Horst when he was doing a Facebook Live video, even to the point where he kinda went off on some guy who brought up the NWS. 

Models are just guidance. If that was all there was to weather, absolute dopes would be weathermen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, anotherman said:

The problem with primarily using climatology and analogs is that we are not necessarily on the same playing field as we have been in the past.

I was thinking about this last evening.  Many of us on here are model followers and then weather spotters when the event happens.  Frankly we can (and quite often do) forecast snow storms, for our local area,  better than professional mets and NWS offices.  But when the snowstorms end we go back to our jobs and do not have to forecast the mundane 250 days a year that the mets do.  It is then that  they have to use climatology and analogs a lot more as there are hundreds of sunny days each year.  Each of these snow storms is unique in some manner and requires leaning on guidance because any analogs are questionable at best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Blizzard of 93 said:

That’s why it’s being upgraded, but they do not even have enough confidence in the replacement to go with it full time yet.

yeah, I read that.  Isnt that just funny sh!t right there.  Sounds like 2020 whatever it is....goes live

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Atomixwx said:

 

Exactly the answer everybody knew. So, Horst is then issuing a prediction based off of climatology and not forecast guidance. 

I got interrupted by an Amber Alert last night, but it sounded like Joe Calhoun at WGAL was giving a similar opinion to that of Horst when he was doing a Facebook Live video, even to the point where he kinda went off on some guy who brought up the NWS. 

Models are just guidance. If that was all there was to weather, absolute dopes would be weathermen.

That's exactly what I said on the previous page. Models are nothing more than guidance. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Itstrainingtime said:

He was too low like most others. He has a very conservative bias which I know and appreciate. I'd rather watch my numbers go up than go down. :) 

but.....there's no fun in low numbers. ^_^

You know we live in the go big or go home era.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Itstrainingtime said:

One thing I'm very concerned about is what happens in the wake of the storm. I often feel like roads icing over is way overrated but i could see how this setup turns into a nightmare. All of that QPF followed by a sudden, hard freeze? 

That is an aspect I don't think we want to overlook. 

TWC made it a point to address flash freeze last night. That is a real possibility. A lot of people going to see the storm subside midday and head out for Championship Sunday and struggle to make it home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, pasnownut said:

^^^^

This

Well...I realize there's some foolishness in doing so. My previous point was that by listening to him he has saved me a lot of heartache over the years. We've been on here chumming it up for 8 or 9 years now. I've been following his forecasts for over 30 years. I do listen and value others certainly, MAG is a great example. I just put weight into what Horst says because he knows Lanco climate like no one else. No one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Itstrainingtime said:

Well...I realize there's some foolishness in doing so. My previous point was that by listening to him he has saved me a lot of heartache over the years. We've been on here chumming it up for 8 or 9 years now. I've been following his forecasts for over 30 years. I do listen and value others certainly, MAG is a great example. I just put weight into what Horst says because he knows Lanco climate like no one else. No one. 

I know and agree.  My inner weenie is just pissed that he is more right than wrong.  Sure he has the occasional bust, but like you, I've been following him for decades.  He is not a band wagon kinda forecaster, and because of that, they are usually the better ones, as they have a more metered approach w/ all of the reasoning previously mentioned.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, pasnownut said:

but.....there's no fun in low numbers. ^_^

You know we live in the go big or go home era.

 

I'd much prefer to have a forecast of 1-3 and get 6 then have a forecast of 4-8 and get 2...

Watching number go up at game time is exhilarating. Watching them being revised downward is depressing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well...I realize there's some foolishness in doing so. My previous point was that by listening to him he has saved me a lot of heartache over the years. We've been on here chumming it up for 8 or 9 years now. I've been following his forecasts for over 30 years. I do listen and value others certainly, MAG is a great example. I just put weight into what Horst says because he knows Lanco climate like no one else. No one. 

Thumbs up!!


.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, daxx said:

The 06z Euro moved north some leading to much less ice. It even takes 850 above state college for some time. I would really be careful with snow maps I think sleet is really contaminating them for some areas. Just my opinion. 

Read several mets who've said the same thing. People see 10" painted over their house and assume it's snow, when it reality a whole crap load of it is sleet. 

I'm telling people at work to expect 1" - 3" here before the flip. Right now I see no reason to change that, and if i do I will. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Itstrainingtime said:

Read several mets who've said the same thing. People see 10" painted over their house and assume it's snow, when it reality a whole crap load of it is sleet. 

I'm telling people at work to expect 1" - 3" here before the flip. Right now I see no reason to change that, and if i do I will. 

I think that is a great call!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...