• Member Statistics

    15,739
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    85snowline
    Newest Member
    85snowline
    Joined
Sign in to follow this  
HillsdaleMIWeather

2017 Spring/Summer Banter, Whining, Complaining Thread

Recommended Posts

33 minutes ago, Stebo said:

 

Such an absurd radar image, I don't think I have ever seen so many tornadic circulations on one radar before.

Wow.  That almost seems like it has to be fake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Watching the Irma coverage yesterday, it was impressive to see those trees holding up in gusts over 100 mph, especially the palm trees.  Of course there was still plenty of tree damage.  But I was thinking if you put those kind of winds on our trees, it would pretty much be total wipeout.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, I looked through the NWS's Hazard Simplification changes, and while the majority are good, I think the Freezing Rain Advisory this cycle should be kept, while their future idea to change Flash Flood Watches to just Flood Watches also isn't a good idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On the hazard simplification note I feel that "Winter Weather Advisory" is just unnecessarily vague in general, and especially so now that they are consolidating the Freezing Rain Advisory into it. It looks like their goal is simpler/fewer types of warnings/watches/advisories with more to-the-point detail in the description.

 

To be completely honest I don't think the public cares too much about this stuff. I think they check the forecast for any sensible weather, i.e. "will it rain tomorrow" and leave it at that. When there's hazardous weather I think they sort of hear the type of advisory (i.e. they see Winter Storm Warning) and then they listen to their preferred TV weather man break down the threat. But my opinion is that they don't care too much about the hazardous weather except when it's a very newsworthy event directly affecting them. Just in conversations with people I hear them misquote forecasts all the time if weather comes up. For instance if there's a Winter Storm Warning and it comes up in conversation they might say "Oh yeah I heard we're getting another 6 inches tomorrow morning!" even if the actual forecast was for snow tapering off by 11 P.M. that night. Just the other day my professor mentioned that hurricanes Irma, Katia, and Jose would all bring hurricane impacts to the US when Irma was the only one that had a realistic threat of that (a Jose landfall was (and still is) way out of predictability range). I think he just saw a headline containing the three hurricane names but didn't investigate any more. This is the real challenge in making a WRN. The public just doesn't care at all about interesting/hazardous weather, and they're perfectly fine with only being generally aware of a warning/advisory being in affect and nothing more (with the exception of maybe Tornado Warnings, at least here in the Midwest).

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, The_Doctor said:

On the hazard simplification note I feel that "Winter Weather Advisory" is just unnecessarily vague in general, and especially so now that they are consolidating the Freezing Rain Advisory into it. It looks like their goal is simpler/fewer types of warnings/watches/advisories with more to-the-point detail in the description.

 

To be completely honest I don't think the public cares too much about this stuff. I think they check the forecast for any sensible weather, i.e. "will it rain tomorrow" and leave it at that. When there's hazardous weather I think they sort of hear the type of advisory (i.e. they see Winter Storm Warning) and then they listen to their preferred TV weather man break down the threat. But my opinion is that they don't care too much about the hazardous weather except when it's a very newsworthy event directly affecting them. Just in conversations with people I hear them misquote forecasts all the time if weather comes up. For instance if there's a Winter Storm Warning and it comes up in conversation they might say "Oh yeah I heard we're getting another 6 inches tomorrow morning!" even if the actual forecast was for snow tapering off by 11 P.M. that night. Just the other day my professor mentioned that hurricanes Irma, Katia, and Jose would all bring hurricane impacts to the US when Irma was the only one that had a realistic threat of that (a Jose landfall was (and still is) way out of predictability range). I think he just saw a headline containing the three hurricane names but didn't investigate any more. This is the real challenge in making a WRN. The public just doesn't care at all about interesting/hazardous weather, and they're perfectly fine with only being generally aware of a warning/advisory being in affect and nothing more (with the exception of maybe Tornado Warnings, at least here in the Midwest).

The average Joe only looks at temps and % chance of precip. They also look at snow predictions, that's it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Jonger said:

The average Joe only looks at temps and % chance of precip. They also look at the top end of snow predictions, that's it.

FYP

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can never understand why anyone would want cold weather all the time and wish for record-breaking cold no matter the season. Winter is so awful, and cold springs are the worst. 

Also, cold is far more deadly than heat, but some are too ignorant to realize that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, rainsucks said:

I can never understand why anyone would want cold weather all the time and wish for record-breaking cold no matter the season. Winter is so awful, and cold springs are the worst. 

Also, cold is far more deadly than heat, but some are too ignorant to realize that. 

 

hopefully you don't live a long lake michigan

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, RogueWaves said:

Yeah, but even Jonger and I agree with him on that point, lol

Oh I agree cold springs are the pits.  If he lives close to the lake like I do it's always the pits.   Get away from the lake and springs are normally pretty spectacular in the midwest if you keep expectations in check.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, UMB WX said:

Oh I agree cold springs are the pits.  If he lives close to the lake like I do it's always the pits.   Get away from the lake and springs are normally pretty spectacular in the midwest if you keep expectations in check.

 

Truth, huge difference sometimes between just Milwaukee and Madison/Rockford, let alone other parts of the Midwest.  This is why I think the best four seasons climo is probably a city like Madison, though if you take out April and May I guess lakeside cities like Milwaukee are pretty nice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah that wouldn't be good.  Hope they have a quiet finish to the tropical season.

Getting kind of fun to scroll through the long range GFS maps that show snow from time to time in the Rockies.  


I follow a bunch of ski related Facebook pages, they were recapping all the peaks that have seen first snow in the last few days. Mainly in Canada, Banff etc. It's happening :-)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An inside day today.

Cranked the A.C. to 70 and doing some web work for the Business. Hopefully next weekend has better weather.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/15/2017 at 1:18 PM, krfd said:

Alta in Utah and Telluride in Colorado, both taken this morning.

f33876c84cf2fc7338bcb458b91c5e1d.jpg

63f8d00d0fc80300bcd5f4b3e326101f.jpg

Nice.

That's weather you can enjoy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an article about how the NWS fixed the wind chill index in 2001. This story is about engineer Maurice Bluestein from Indianapolis, who realized the old wind chill index was wrong, and did something about it.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/14/science/maurice-bluestein-who-modernized-the-wind-chill-index-dies-at-76.html?smid=tw-nytimesscience&smtyp=cur

 

Quote

The two began studying wind chill and wrote papers about their findings, drawing the attention of both the United States and Canadian governments in 2001. Soon they were enlisted by both countries to develop a new formula.

As part of the project they conducted a series of experiments with 12 people, male and female, measuring heat loss from the face in cold and wind as they walked on treadmills in a wind tunnel at different temperatures. A “wet trial” sprayed participants’ faces with a splash of water every 15 seconds to measure whether the presence of precipitation would make people feel colder.

After plotting the data, they found that in some cases the original wind chill index was off by just a few degrees, but that the discrepancy grew at higher wind speeds. It confirmed what many meteorologists had already suspected: The old calculation had exaggerated.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting some conflicting signals about winter.  Some reasons to be optimistic if you like cold/snow, but some things that are a little disconcerting (some 2nd year Ninas after a Nino really stunk!).  Whatever happens happens, right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hoosier said:

Getting some conflicting signals about winter.  Some reasons to be optimistic if you like cold/snow, but some things that are a little disconcerting (some 2nd year Ninas after a Nino really stunk!).  Whatever happens happens, right?

I'm surprised we don't have a winter thread yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.