Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Post super bowl storm Model discussion


UlsterCountySnowZ

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Unless there is an actual frontal passage (i.e. the surface feature passes to the north of the station and the wind shifts into the sw)...I'm not sure how the 2m temp gets close to 40 F with a NE wind. Its not plausible.

In terms of surface temperatures, I have my doubts, as well. I'm more concerned about the mid-levels where there is warming aloft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i got screwed during the blizzard here im hoping this one hits good and seems like it might i still got a good amount of snow otg though

Until last Monday's storm...all of SNE was terribly overdue for snow.  West of a line from Hartford down to New Haven...they are still running big time negative snow anomalies...Nature evens things out over the course of time. 

Remember, many parts of SNE average twice as much snow as the NYC area...and some of the higher spots in the Berkshires & Litchfield Hills average three and four times as much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In terms of surface temperatures, I have my doubts, as well. I'm more concerned about the mid-levels where there is warming aloft.

 

The global model is not one of the more reliable repositories for 2m temperatures...5 degree (F) errors (either way) are not uncommon.

 

I always cite those silly text printouts as an example of the problems in this area.  Invariably, the GFS with print out wx conditions of "snow" at JFK while concurrently printing out "rain" at Bridgeport.  Does such a circumstance ever occur in real life?  Yes, but only every blue moon...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The global model is not one of the more reliable repositories for 2m temperatures...5 degree errors (either way) are not uncommon.

I always cite those silly text printouts as an example of the problems in this area. Invariably, the GFS with print out wx conditions of "snow" at JFK while concurrently printing out "rain" at Bridgeport. Does such a circumstance ever occur in real life? Yes, but only every blue moon...

You guys keep breaking out in these long discussions about random topics...this is a model thread for the storm Monday

NE seasonal snow average has nothing to do with this thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless there is an actual frontal passage (i.e. the surface feature passes to the north of the station and the wind shifts into the sw)...I'ot sure how the 2m temp gets close to 40 F with a NE wind. Its not plausible.

You're absolutely 100000000% correct !!! No way can that happen. Now if the coastal front moves through and shifts winds to SE sure! I remember back in feb 07 winds In long beach stayed NE and we had freezing rain and never cracked freezing . Further east winds did switch to SE and there it rained

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In terms of surface temperatures, I have my doubts, as well. I'm more concerned about the mid-levels where there is warming aloft.

 

Don, I think like any other storm...you have to go with climatology here.  Before the event last Monday, I wrote that traditionally, those types of events tend to put the heaviest amounts off to the north & east and the lesser amounts as one moves southwestward...which was exactly what took place. This one is obviously materially different synoptically...but referencing the past may prove helpful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The global model is not one of the more reliable repositories for 2m temperatures...5 degree (F) errors (either way) are not uncommon.

 

I always cite those silly text printouts as an example of the problems in this area.  Invariably, the GFS with print out wx conditions of "snow" at JFK while concurrently printing out "rain" at Bridgeport.  Does such a circumstance ever occur in real life?  Yes, but only every blue moon...

I don't disagree. That's why my starting point is 3"-6" in and around the city including adjacent suburbs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The wind direction is fickle too on the latest models that have warmed, some have JFK going SE and some do not, and even the ones that do not think they're going to 40 degrees.

 

Well a wind shift can only really take place if there is a warm frontal passage...I mean there might be some sort of weird exception if a bit of a coastal front forms...they might be a little more common around Boston than here...resulting from protracted easterly flow as storms approach from the SW. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its always a pain to guess snow for NYC in these events because the start time and banding issues.  Usually its 2-4, sometimes its 3-5, 6 is about the upper end and in this event it appears to me the WAA is just going to be too strong for them to reach 6.  I would say the biggest window for snow they can get is 03-11Z and probably only 06z onward are you looking at anything more than light.  This does not come off to me as an event where the snow would move in unexpectedly early because the high is not positioned correctly, that usually occurs when the high is over Maine or SE Canada or even off the New England coast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its always a pain to guess snow for NYC in these events because the start time and banding issues.  Usually its 2-4, sometimes its 3-5, 6 is about the upper end and in this event it appears to me the WAA is just going to be too strong for them to reach 6.  I would say the biggest window for snow they can get is 03-11Z and probably only 06z onward are you looking at anything more than light.  This does not come off to me as an event where the snow would move in unexpectedly early because the high is not positioned correctly, that usually occurs when the high is over Maine or SE Canada or even off the New England coast.

 

But the anticyclone is nicely stretched across eastern Canada in such a way that any retreat would be minimal...consequently, models forecasting huge surges of warmth up towards CT & northern NJ may be a little overdone, when push comes to shove.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the anticyclone is nicely stretched across eastern Canada in such a way that any retreat would be minimal...consequently, models forecasting huge surges of warmth up towards CT & northern NJ may be a little overdone, when push comes to shove.

I'm in this camp, Pam and have been for 2 days. Something is "off" with this particular warm push progged on most of the models. We will see what happens. Always fascinating.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in this camp, Pam and have been for 2 days. Something is "off" with this particular warm push progged on most of the models. We will see what happens. Always fascinating.

Sent from my iPhone

 

See these so called "SWFE" usually have an anticyclone parked over New England as they approach from the west.  The anticyclone is steadily moving off to the northeast or east...and consequently, any cold air is quickly eroded...and snow yields around here are usually minimal...all you can get is what falls before the High sufficiently loses its influence while moisture overruns the cold air at the surface.

This situation is materially different.  You have arctic air all across eastern Canada and Low pressure sitting over Labrador.  This cold air is most assuredly not retreating...it may be giving a bit...but just a bit.  Thus I am confounded by these models treating this like a quick snow to rain event.  Moreover, you throw in the fact that we are now going into February...when the general storm track is at its most suppressed...and things don't seem quite as they are being painted this evening. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See these so called "SWFE" usually have an anticyclone parked over New England as they approach from the west.  The anticyclone is steadily moving off to the northeast or east...and consequently, any cold air is quickly eroded...and snow yields around here are usually minimal...all you can get is what falls before the High sufficiently loses its influence while moisture overruns the cold air at the surface.

This situation is materially different.  You have arctic air all across eastern Canada and Low pressure sitting over Labrador.  This cold air is most assuredly not retreating...it may be giving a bit...but just a bit.  Thus I am confounded by these models treating this like a quick snow to rain event.  Moreover, you throw in the fact that we are now going into February...when the general storm track is at its most suppressed...and things don't seem quite as they are being painted this evening. 

Precisely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the last event was a fluke and the GFS did not do as well as many people think, it badly busted over in SNE.  That setup was crazy complicated and the models had a harder time with it.

The Euro "saw" the blizzard but got its placement wrong. The GFS got the placement right but "saw" a minor snow event.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excuse me, what is SWFE?

 

Truth be told, I did not recognize the term until a few years ago...I don't know its origin...but I believe it means SW Flow event.  I use it very rarely; though I did made an exception here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...