Jump to content


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited


About UlsterCountySnowZ

  • Rank
    **** U
  • Birthday 07/11/1988

Profile Information

  • Four Letter Airport Code For Weather Obs (Such as KDCA)
  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

3,951 profile views
  1. UlsterCountySnowZ

    December 2018 General Discussion & Observations

    Gotta say, despite being a ways out, Im happy with today’s trends, a slower more amplified overall solution allowing that northern stream SW to influence the trough, coupled with more progressive confluence, leads to some nice northward adjustments, the vertically stacked nature means we need more favorable Upper level wind otherwise we sheer our precip shield...a lot of time for this to creep up
  2. UlsterCountySnowZ

    April 2018 Discussions & Observations Thread

    with the AO on the rise and gaining by this weekend, the first wave should lift a bit quicker than currently modeled, allowing for a quicker drop of the retrograded SW to dive down into the CONUS and orientate our trough neutral, and just maybe Neg, the southern stream seems to be just fine with intensity/location, and models have been trending more amplified in that regard, i wouldnt be making any bold claims in either direction just yet, until we see how the friday wave is panning out come thursday mornin into Fri, this has last min bump north written in Dark ink
  3. UlsterCountySnowZ

    April 2nd Snow Wave

    3.8” here, lasted 3 hours... gone 100%
  4. UlsterCountySnowZ

    Interior NW Burbs & Hudson Valley Second Half 2018

    Had 3.8” then all melted lol
  5. i understand that, but you specifically said interior...the interior with those soundings is not gonna be 7:1..... i just snowed at 34 degrees and marginal 850 and accumulated 19" no problem
  6. city hit hard on RGEM
  7. btw, RGEM just caved hard to the nam
  8. whats your reasoning on interior, ill take my area for example...16F tonight, high of 33 tomorrow, then 26 tomorrow night, then just up to freezing WED, then snow falls at 28F.....with 850s at -5+... i dont think the grounds gonna have a cooling issue
  9. if you look at mid/upper levels and understand why the gfs evolved as it did, it was actually an improvement where it matter
  10. 12z was better imo...a small step back this run, not much changed for coast, but those in far NE pa and a tad further whiff
  11. if i got paid for every time models overamped eastern convection, pulling our best dynamics with it, id be rich...usually its the cause for our double barrel looks in this model range, never pans out imo
  12. the small trends mentioned above leads to our lead SW escaping a bit, no biggie, the trend to be admired is our orientation...MUCH better once again
  13. focusing and hoping on the wrong wave imo....id prefer a sheared first wave, with the follow up every aspect of the bigger solution trended more favorable on the GFS and icon.... look at the ridge/heights/confluence/ and trough as well as second wave....
  14. UlsterCountySnowZ

    March 2018 Model Discussion

    expectations are so high, people dont realize how lucky they’ve been
  15. UlsterCountySnowZ

    March 2018 Model Discussion

    Good, all is well, I’m back to work, thanks lol