Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Possible Weekend Snowstorm, Jan 24 2015


ineedsnow

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

That swath around Bob's house looks like a great spot onthis run. Goes to town for a while.

 

974 near the benchmark

Looks sloppy but I should get some light snows on the initial WAA burst before 850s torch and than it's a waiting game on how fast the SLP can go to town and crash heights.  An hour or 2 will make a big difference in totals for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure I read a few weeks ago it does have a warm bias in the lower levels .

 

Wouldn't surprise me. The old one had a severe one on coastal systems, so even increasing the resolution probably couldn't get rid of all of it.

 

It's funny looking at the soundings vs the 2D map on the GFS...it looks like the 850 0C line gets about 10-15 miles NW of BOS at the height, but when you look at the soundings, its like isothermal at 0.5C, lol. It's not the usual +2C or something you might expect looking at that.

 

This is a good example of how much the dynamic height crash is going to matter in those marginal areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't surprise me. The old one had a severe one on coastal systems, so even increasing the resolution probably couldn't get rid of all of it.

 

It's funny looking at the soundings vs the 2D map on the GFS...it looks like the 850 0C line gets about 10-15 miles NW of BOS at the height, but when you look at the soundings, its like isothermal at 0.5C, lol. It's not the usual +2C or something you might expect looking at that.

 

This is a good example of how much the dynamic height crash is going to matter in those marginal areas.

 

Like you said, it doesn't quite bomb it and develop a nice coherent CCB. Looks like best blob of precip is near the Cape with the real good height falls and low level frontogenesis.  NAM is doing the same, it can't quite close off H5 in time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't surprise me. The old one had a severe one on coastal systems, so even increasing the resolution probably couldn't get rid of all of it.

It's funny looking at the soundings vs the 2D map on the GFS...it looks like the 850 0C line gets about 10-15 miles NW of BOS at the height, but when you look at the soundings, its like isothermal at 0.5C, lol. It's not the usual +2C or something you might expect looking at that.

This is a good example of how much the dynamic height crash is going to matter in those marginal areas.

this would be fun,12_GFS_060_41.79-71.88_skewt_ML.gif
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like you said, it doesn't quite bomb it and develop a nice coherent CCB. Looks like best blob of precip is near the Cape with the real good height falls and low level frontogenesis.  NAM is doing the same, it can't quite close off H5 in time.

 

Anyone think the precip shield will wind up being even more compact than modeled? It seems to me the models tend to "overdo" the precip shileds when you have one of these compact nukes feeding off DCVA as opposed to the QPF field not being broad enough for the more generic big warm advection/DCVA storms. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this would be fun,12_GFS_060_41.79-71.88_skewt_ML.gif

 

Yes, it would be but between 00z and 03z it looks like you get one or two hundreths of an inch. That sounding is a bit misleading for ptype forecasting during the height of the storm.

 

I do agree tyhat someone gets croaked. Hopefully it's me but I'm not terribly optimistic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That swath around Bob's house looks like a great spot onthis run. Goes to town for a while.

974 near the benchmark

edit 978 need glasses

It doesn't look all that great to me. I think we taint/rain for a decent amount of time with that look. The million dollar question is how fast do we flip back over. As Bob noted, 1 or 2 hour differences are huge.

I think the box map is pretty good. I think that illustrates the most likely scenario for this area.

Flips to heavy snow for a short period and we pick up a couple of inches

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone think the precip shield will wind up being even more compact than modeled? It seems to me the models tend to "overdo" the precip shileds when you have one of these compact nukes feeding off DCVA as opposed to the QPF field not being broad enough for the more generic big warm advection/DCVA storms. 

 

If the GFS is right, it's more concentrated further SE IMO. You aren't getting a ton of moisture advection when it's forced out in one area leaving a narrow CCB. But, that is only speaking of the GFS verbatim. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...