All Activity

damn good point

Thoughts are you should wait a few days before even considering something 8 days out a possibility.

All guidance appears to be "struggling" with the amplitude of shortwaves coming down the ridge from AK to CA. This is an area where minor perturbations grow into mature trofs or deep upper lows. It may or may not also be a data sparse region. This is leading to huge intra-and inter-model variability with respect to west coast trofs, their amplitude, and which is dominant.

December has been one of the most challenging months for sustaining deep -NAO patterns since 2011. Pretty much the opposite of May. This is one of the reasons why we haven’t seen a repeat of record December snows from 2000 to 2010 around NYC.

Can’t argue with you. This is the time of year you want to hit your stride and start to peak. That ain’t the Eagles. Do they do anything well? You could say defense but now the injuries are piling up. The thing about the NFL this year is I don’t see any elite team, everyone looks beatable.

Check out this discontinuity between 0z and 06z on the GFS. That's day 5.

without a more favorable pattern, looks unlikely. Unless you mean far nne (threats)

ensemble blends are fine to get a general idea /big picture

everyone should switch to Bluesky

It certainly opens up the door to good thermal gradient. And obviously yes, that powers storms. But with that comes some southeast ridge and then the storm track might get dicey. i’m just saying these are some of the things that I kind of see that perhaps are a little concerning to me, but I’m not writing off December or anything like that. It’s too far out to really determine that just don’t be shocked if all this snowy talk doesn’t exactly happen at least in southern New England. Probably will be a great December up north. One day we’ll sit back with a massive ridge out west where Calgary is 85 in December. I’ll sit outside and smoke a cjgar without a care in the world as the snow falls on my nude body.

The early ride up the roller coaster is my favorite part.

The worries are beginning . Energy Mets on right track of Dec 1-15 of snow threats and then ending

No concerns yet. The models are horrendous in the long range. We should enter a mild period thought in mid December.

Meteorologists, What are your current thoughts regarding the December 3rd system? Do we have a good shot at some early-season snow, and if so, what needs to occur for such an event to happen?

But wont that help us? I mean oresssine cold out weff go…And the big contrast in temps can produce some good baroclonicity? Or am I completely mistaken lol?

6z gefs milder in the extended. Canada is cold but more normal at end, with S US roasting. Concerns

@40/70 Benchmark @Donsutherland1 @Bluewave They are finally admitting the obvious… “A stratospheric wave-reflection event is becoming more likely. Energy that had been expected to propagate into the stratosphere and weaken the vortex now appears more likely to reflect back into the troposphere. This often strengthens the Atlantic jet stream and can trigger a rapid recovery in the stratospheric vortex. This is likely why recent modelling has shifted toward a more zonal pattern compared with earlier expectations. If this occurs, and we see downward coupling from the stratosphere into the troposphere during December, then even with supportive background signals for blocking, stronger westerlies aloft could flatten the pattern and favour a more zonal setup significantly reducing the risk of sustained blocking or cold.”

What I was hoping to see was some -NAO to help sort of keep the PV further south. But without that we’ll probably be prone to cutters. Hard to tell at this point. I do think we’ll have chances unlike previous Decembers, but I wouldn’t plan on extended snow pack at least in southern New England.

The PV will eventually migrate more to where it should be in northern Canada and cause a big temperature difference between the Canadian border and southern US.

I think it’s helped with the Pacific side of things, but a lot of this action seems to be focused more in the stratosphere and not a whole lot in the troposphere. Overhyped as usual.

I’ll buy an EV when they start offering the kind of EV I want to buy, right now the EVs marketed here in the US are either heavy, bulky high end luxury cars and trucks and SUVs, or ultra small economy compact cars. Where is the 4 door sedan (like a Camry) with the 250 mile range?

Question: doesn’t it take some time for any SSW affects to show up? Are we getting a PV split? Isn’t the big anomaly(PV) in SE Canada on modeling, a result of the SSW? Or no?

1. No, ext for same run comes out a day later. —————— 2. GEFS 2 days ago: GEFS yesterday: gets to phase 8 five days earlier than any other GEFS as of then: GEFS today: curled back very slightly vs yesterday (E US cold lovers wouldn’t want a curl back into phase 7) but very similar to yesterday/look how different it is vs 2 days ago!

lol at using YouTube as a source for insightful scientific commentary the “soul” of science is the scientific method, saying “science has lost its soul” is pure emotion and has nothing to do with science

All the disrobing to wind reversals and it’s a neutral to +AO lol. Maybe it’s helped with the WPO area. But yeah just keep that cross polar flow coming. I told Ray I do see some signs of zonal flow so I feel like we’ll be sweating bullets at times. Guidance is already warming in the srn US. Let’s hope we average out to be more on the good side of things.