Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. The difference IMO seems to be how soon it goes from Neutral to negative tilt.
  3. Ugh. Is there even a Model showing that low ?
  4. Yea…I miffed by the NBM. It’s interesting that it looks like it uses old data/model runs. Please let us know what you find out.
  5. But the Euro was farthest south and had highest totals for MBY.
  6. Well, for some reason when I select the 00z Jan 30th 2026 NBM 6 hr snow fall at hr 36, it says it's using model runs from Dec 17, 2025 on the NBM dashboard. So I'm not sure which runs of what model they are using but I can't find any model that gives me a half an inch besides the UK.
  7. What trends? Not seeing anything positive for the IL side tbh
  8. They didn't salt the hell out of the roads like now. We used to sled on our street for weeks back then.
  9. NAM is a huge improvement. gets 5-6 into SEVA and the snow line has moved alot NW to the doorstep of RIC
  10. Thanks so much @donsutherland1 I was always envious that my cousins near W-B got more snow than in my hometown. lol
  11. Looks just lame altogether other than a 75 mile wide strip near the Tidewater and E NC. 0.3” liquid as snow for Raleigh is notable and I think a warning event down there but nothing historic.
  12. We need to be as close to that ULL as possible. Compare the positions of the ULL on runs we like vs runs we don’t. She’s getting a bit too far south now.
  13. Confession. I am the one who actually puts out the NBM with a secret snow formula
  14. Its crazy how the convection is so pronounced and widespread it creates it own cold pool and shreds apart the ULL over the coast Wild
  15. From the KU books: The trough went negative and the storm wound up tracking inland relative to NYC.
  16. The 0z NBM was pretty much a repeat of the 18z. Gonna see what models they used. It literally has 1/2 inch for me.
  17. I thought digging would help negate downsloping but now I'm not so sure
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...