Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. How is this evidence of anything?
  3. why don't you message him and tell him what you think
  4. That's quite worrisome, especially when it comes to science. Science is truly at the cutting edge of knowledge creation and, if expertise is watered down, it will have an adverse impact on that outcome.
  5. When it’s mild there isn’t enough instability to generate showers so the moisture from the lakes just sits in a uniform layer doing nothing. In a cold lake effect pattern there’s usually sunbreaks between bands and when the wind shifts less onshore. Also, the small bit of Pacific moisture aloft makes it harder for the stratus to evaporate from the top like it can with a bone dry arctic airmass above it. This is my explanation.
  6. Naw. Models have been kind of all over SNE. NNE and CNE should do better but I think most of Mass will do ok. Not sure about SW CT.
  7. and setting up a FB page and website and promoting yourself as an expert and getting people to pay you for your services is even easier !
  8. This is the worst map I have ever seen. Everything about it is wrong. Its probably a map created by AI where the prompter asked for a map showing a warm transition It's the only explanation. There is absolutely no meteorology behind this map
  9. My favorite weather hiking is arguably the Shenandoah's in a good upslope event. Frankly its otherworldly to ascend into the cloud deck and go from showers to a downpour on the mountainside. While I love my snow hikes rain hikes are even more dynamic. Hoping I get some opportunities for that this spring with temperatures around 60.
  10. I was just thinking the same: As long as it's not a logbook fail, I'll take that if need be, lol
  11. Exactly. Sadly nowadays even a degree doesn’t mean much. It is very hard to “fail” someone out of a degree these days. There is so much “support” to help even the weakest minds through. Failing at the basics while still earning a science degree is very much achievable now.
  12. Work took me down Seaside today; I’ve never seen the Barnegat Bay frozen solid from shore to shore. Manasquan inlet up by Point was open water, but down by the Route 37 bridge it was frozen solid.
  13. Please God let the HRRR be right it has me nearly reach 70 degrees tomorrow.
  14. With the preliminary climate report for today 31/10 the scoring above is now confirmed. I will review the snowfall situation at end of tomorrow's data and score the snowfall forecasts separately just for fun. CPcantmeasuresnow had a perfect 17/3 going before the final report of 18/3 changed the results by one degree but still finished first in the temperature contest. Thanks for participating.
  15. Snow depth still at 5.5-6.3”
  16. Whatever the merits of this map, arctic cold does not arrive in the west from the central Pacific. It builds down from the Yukon.
  17. RGEM GFS and NAM have 1-2 inches just north of NYC tomorrow night
  18. Ehhhh its progression makes sense sadly. Not saying its right but with this pattern we are relying solely on timing so a situation where the 50/50 is too progressive and we end up without any cold at all is possible. Though I guess it's a less damning storm in terms of PSU's climate change book if that happens.
  19. We need like weekly 1” rain events for a couple months and then a juicy thunderstorm season. Drought just won’t quit us…
  20. It’s an ugly run but we wouldn’t trust the GFS if it showed a snowstorm at hr 144 so why trust it now?
  21. It’s pretty obvious at this point that we’re gonna need to wait at least a week or two for a snowstorm. We’re due for a late season triple phaser anyway.
  22. KEY MESSAGE 3... A deep Pacific trof is expected to spawn low pres E of the Rockies by Sat, then track it across the Southeast and offshore by Mon, potentially passing close enough to impact the local area. The modeling has been consistent with the general idea of the storm, but there remains a high amount of uncertainty with the details. Most of the data suggests a W to E, or SW to NE type track, not making a big hook up the coast. The arctic air thus far looks limited, so this could be a sys with a lot of mixed pcpn and rain, with a decent freezing rain threat inland if the low tracks to the S and the flow remains backed at the sfc. Too far out to have confidence in the details, and with the AIGFS consistently S of the area, it could end up being just a glancing blow or nothing at all. Still, with the multi-model support, the NBM is producing a 60-70 pop for the event. Stuck with the NBM for the fcst, but of all the fields the temps in particular may be much too high for the event if the flow remains backed and CAD occurs
  23. You did but reading between your posts were thinking north of 90
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...