Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. NWS has Elbert County in the circle. Just got to get that low a little bit more west.
  3. Or Jan-Feb 2011. That snowpack was epic.
  4. Absolutely i can easily at the very least see this being a little 1-3/2-4” refresher as we get grazed like how the gfs is right now….
  5. 18z CMC and Euro got 9/50 dropscondes in their data set... 0z suite should have them all Lifted from NE forum.
  6. We had over a foot on our deck. I opened our front door to look outside and the wind was howling. I was struggling to close the door, and before I could get it closed, the back of our sofa was covered in snow. It was amazing!
  7. I think my place got 6.5" after doing a bit more measuring and shoveling Monday. Today, a snow squall formed between me and Cleveland. That brought briefly very bad conditions over by Cleveland. The third image posted may not be representing the snowfall values between Columbus and Toledo the best. I think my brother and sister got 9". They're in different places.
  8. That same thought came to mind. The tv mets are tired and probably over fatigued from comments calling it a “bust” they will be even more conservative.
  9. I suspect it's going to be a big eastern half of North Carolina/South Carolina snow event. That area is the general focus for Bouncycorn.
  10. We got another 1/2" dusting tonight about 30 minutes ago. Brought the dog out and surprise surprise, it was snowing. 12 F
  11. Welp this will be settled fellow weenier when the maps come out, which who knows when that’ll be.
  12. I was a kid in Charles County during that one. I'm sure I've got pictures of it somewhere in my parents' photos.I think we had around 2', but I was only 7 so I can't verify that.
  13. Also fwiw, some subjective model reanalysis from 48 hours: https://forecastwatch.com/2026/01/27/major-u-s-snowstorm-forecast-accuracy-analysis-january-23-26/ Good to know everyone blew it for us
  14. I don't believe so. AIFS takes Euro analysis members and uses them as input to an ensemble of AI models. AIFS and AIGFS aren't bad really since they're run by met centers. It's the "observation driven" models where you see the most shady verification practices.
  15. As noted earlier, IMO writing the event off completely goes beyond what can reasonably be supported by the models and their ensembles. Indeed, there has been some improvement during the 18z cycle.
  16. It happened on Saturday morning during the storm of the century. No power but it came through on the weather radio. TW
  17. This is a dangerous slippery slope for weather weenies.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...