All Activity

Muggy here. 73

83F at 1030 AM on September 18th. And with NW breeze. Unreal.

I'm shocked.

As usual, all the rain is in PA.

Endless relentless Septorcher !

99L looks like a storm already. This is going to break the streak. This one snuck up on me

relentless torch? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Guidance today is moving to the quicker transition and breakdown of the heat ridge. Ensembles and deterministic models generally have a pretty big change coming. Even the Apple app has me in the 70s next week for highs. The real feels will be almost 25 degrees cooler than this weeks.

The SOI has been negative for 37 days in a row.

Well this one is dead and buried

It has been dry here. The irrigation ponds at the golf course have dropped considerably over the last few weeks.

Yeah, I'm just not sure how much I buy it. We've seen plenty of times, especially early in the season where guidance gets way too coastal happy. I'll say though, I am not looking forward to Fall or Winter weather forecasting. I don't think this has gotten the proper attention this deserves but the reduction in balloon launches I think is going to have severe negative impacts on models and forecasting. In fact, we've even seen it this summer. There have been multiple instances where local NWS offices in the central Plains/Midwest and I think even from SPC where they noted the reduction in launches having a significant impact on even short-term severe forecasting. I know we have better equipment and technology from satellites but balloon launches are still a critical part in the modeling process.

We are on the schedule next week for our long-awaited patio install. It's gonna pour folks!

Same people bitching about the two weeks of rain would be panicking about how we aren't seeing coastals start to show in the lead up to winter.

A good signal for coastal systems the next two weeks.

If the northern interior and elevations can squeak out all winter months < 5 F above normal (might be tough to pull off in December) they should do just fine with all the ample moisture. Coast I think is more hit or miss. We'd likely need a period with good blocking to get close to seasonal.

More concisely the point I was after ... AI is not a spontaneous emergence. It's not just you. There's a palpable vibe in the ongoing meme of it all, an ominous implication, as though it is an unstoppable spontaneous emergence. A lot of that is the "AI Executa"'s doing. They've certainly been helping to create a uncertain, if not unnerving scenario end game but ... has it never stuck anyone as odd that no one has said the following yet? stop creating it Again, AI is not the threat; the humans being creating it are the threat. AI won't emerge on it's own. If there is that much daunting uncertainty as to the end game, then the solution in prevention is only unclear to a 5-year old. Anyway, so I am not really disagreeing with you that it could be an agency of harm? Of course that's true. That could come about both wittingly, or unwittingly. For fun: The "witting" rendition is that we are all being manipulated in a really diabolical way... The apparatus of progenitors of the "AI brain" (think giant cube in "Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy" ha!) are consummately warning of this that and the other thing, as though when we've arrived into any such state of affairs ( their actual goal), they can blame it on the 'we warned you' divisiveness. As though the consequence was built in, and not their fault - -as though it is ours for allowing them? That would never work, of course. As dumbed-down and feckless, willing to be led around and guided as we humans have become during these generational legs of the Industrial bubble, there's still enough intelligentsia in there to place blame appropriately should "Skynet" launch its proverbial missiles. However, here's the diabolical thing: they know that. They're not actually trying escape culpability - they really don't care. No morality there. No ...they're trying to diverge our attention along the way. All there warnings come off much like propagandizing its significance - popping out of the witting fantasy for a split second, perhaps that's the capitalistic mark-up. In fairness, the historical verdict is undecided... But one thing I'm noticing also is that it's keeping us stoned by our collect fascination. Maybe helped along by civility's apparent epidemic: psycho-tropic 'blue-light' dystopian addiction. As stimulation junkies, we just want the high from their story. ...until we are in a realm when it has become too late. What they've really created was the sociopath's utopia (ooh, that's a cool title for a book!) Heh, that's a fun James Bond plot perhaps. Scott Galloway, NYU professor among other accolades ... including is wealth, recently spoke on the subject of AI in ... I'm not sure whose pod-cast space, AI was built for the rich, not for you. I've appreciated his articulation/conjectures on sociodynamics and driving mechanisms of zeitgeist in past. Admittedly only hear of this quote in this case, but the idea of this being "by design" ...mm does creep a little. He's right enough that an 'intrinsic circumstance' could be more likely, in my opinion - I mean who the hell else could afford the financing behind this type of transformative power? Then there's the unwitting rendition - which despite the fantastic above is actually a harder sell for me. Just because of the nature of what consciousness appears to be. That's why I cited Roger Penrose, and stopped just short of shamelessly punching my own published work on the matter ( nyuk nyuk). His et al was a Physical peer review. I did not know it existed prior or during when I set out to create my story. I stumbled upon the idea listening to NPR at a stop sign, circa 2004. They background was an interview with a world renowned Neurophysiologist - no means to recall the name or salutation from this range. The conjectural concepts for my novel eerily describe precisely the Penrose: magnetically conductive microtubules are instrumental in the emergence of consciousness. There may be other ways in the Universe to create consciousness - duh. Perhaps "create" isn't the right word. Perhaps "emerge" really is the best and we should stick with that, because all science and perspectives (history) agrees that its origin is an emergence. We can confidently suggest at a minimum that all brains on earth engage in a chemical-physiologically guided electrodynamic dance. The sparkling on invented tools that convert electroencephalography (EEG) for visualization, for example. They evince what ancient scholars already knew...etc. However consciousness is kind of separate from that. Penrose et al outright implicate Physically that it is not where consciousness originates, rather, quantum feedback is implied. As I told implicitly in my story, it is a synergistic byproduct of the same processing. So all brains are a chemical-physiologically guided electrodynamic process. The amount and coherence of synergistic emergence from that is variable. Consciousness is like gravity, though. Try and try as we must ... the brain trust of Humanity will never be able quantize gravity. The ambit will stubbornly continue to spent trillions on colliders and University legislation and never will. We can only say that the moon has less gravity than the sun, but both have gravity. A mouse is less awareness of what is going on around in both discrete and abstraction than does the cat. Penrose et al would like to quantize consciousness. We cannot quantize consciousness. Consciousness, I strongly personally believe, is a field ...just like gravity. Just like magnetism. There are ultimately - though needing some sort of exotic math and matching breakthroughs of philosophy thereof - fields are that no quantized but are there because of other other actions. Though all of that... what we can infer with high confidence is, AI is not that. Haha. So again ...if there's another way to achieve higher order consciousness in the cosmos than so be it. Fine. We have to be open to that possibility. But where AI/research is, its not creating a bubble that is inflated by emergence. As far as the 8 billion elimination argument... It's easier to eliminate 8 million than it is to eliminate 8 billion. A planet colliding with Earth would do the trick on the latter, but since that would be exceptionally rare to the point of not happening in any practical discussion ... it follows that whatever catastrophe less than such extreme ... leaves at least a vestige.

Yeah it doesn’t look like a disaster. I’m skeptical of these snow anomaly maps to begin with. I just thought it was funny SLK cleans up again. We want as many dice rolls as we can get. Keep it active and we can do ok.

I think if you live at least at 40 N or above you should be happy with the wet signal. It takes a seriously rotter winter to get tons of precip with little snow at that latitude (not saying it can't happen). I'd rather gamble with wet than get stuck with cold dry. I recall 2024-2025 was bitter cold on the east coast but absolutely bone dry because of the niña. Those winters suck.

How about pee pee?

Looks a lot like it save for the deep se/FL.

We have a shot at 3 months in a row where part of the region goes 10”+. Monthly Data for September 2026 for Upton NY NWS CWA Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending. CT NORTHFORD 0.8 SW CoCoRaHS 8.22 CT FAIRFIELD 1.5 NE CoCoRaHS 7.97 CT DARIEN 2.4 NW CoCoRaHS 7.64 CT NORWALK 1.4 ENE CoCoRaHS 7.36 CT TRUMBULL 2.6 SSE CoCoRaHS 7.14 CT STAMFORD 1.0 S CoCoRaHS 6.69 CT JEWETT CITY 3.0 ESE CoCoRaHS 6.68 NJ FAIR LAWN 1.2 SE CoCoRaHS 6.63 CT NORWALK 2.9 NNW CoCoRaHS 6.55 Monthly Data for August 2026 for Upton NY NWS CWA Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending. NJ CLARK TWP 1.3 ENE CoCoRaHS 12.48 NJ LINDEN 2.2 NW CoCoRaHS 12.19 NJ HARRISON COOP 11.78 NJ CRANFORD TWP 1.1 ESE CoCoRaHS 10.99 NY FRANKLIN SQUARE 1.1 N CoCoRaHS 10.92 NJ CLARK TWP 0.7 SSW CoCoRaHS 10.88 NJ KEARNY 1.7 NNW CoCoRaHS 10.88 NJ NEWARK LIBERTY INTL AP WBAN 10.19 Monthly Data for July 2026 for Upton NY NWS CWA Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending. NY BEACON 4.2 ESE CoCoRaHS 17.14 NY PEEKSKILL 2.8 NNE CoCoRaHS 16.45 CT BETHEL 0.5 E CoCoRaHS 15.83 CT DANBURY COOP 15.12 NY NELSONVILLE 0.3 S CoCoRaHS 14.54 CT NEWTOWN 5.3 S CoCoRaHS 14.51 CT BETHEL 3.5 NNE CoCoRaHS 14.07 CT OAKDALE 2.6 WNW CoCoRaHS 13.97 NY SHRUB OAK COOP 13.93 NY GARRISON 1.5 NE CoCoRaHS 13.76 CT NEWTOWN 4.6 SE CoCoRaHS 13.64 CT SALEM 3.6 SE CoCoRaHS 13.60 CT STRATFORD 0.2 ESE CoCoRaHS 13.43 CT SHELTON 1.3 W CoCoRaHS 13.23 CT SHELTON 1.3 W CoCoRaHS 13.12 CT NORTHFORD 0.8 SW CoCoRaHS 13.11 CT BETHEL 4.5 SSE CoCoRaHS 13.09 CT FAIRFIELD 1.5 NE CoCoRaHS 13.08 CT CHESTER CENTER 2.7 WNW CoCoRaHS 12.93 NY YORKTOWN HEIGHTS 2.7 NNW CoCoRaHS 12.43 CT TRUMBULL 2.6 SSE CoCoRaHS 12.43 CT BROOKFIELD 3.3 SSE CoCoRaHS 12.42 CT IGOR I SIKORSKY MEMORIAL AIRPORT WBAN 12.33 NY CARMEL 4N COOP 11.95 CT RIDGEFIELD 2.4 NNE CoCoRaHS 11.84 NY SEAFORD 0.4 SE CoCoRaHS 11.82 NY LAKE CARMEL 0.7 NE CoCoRaHS 11.75 NJ HAWTHORNE 1.0 SSE CoCoRaHS 11.71 CT SOUTHBURY 2.3 W CoCoRaHS 11.53 NY PATTERSON 1.3 E CoCoRaHS 11.28 CT GUILFORD COOP 11.19 NY NEW WINDSOR 3.3 W CoCoRaHS 11.18 NJ CEDAR GROVE TWP 0.4 W CoCoRaHS 11.17 CT DURHAM 1.2 W CoCoRaHS 11.14 CT WALLINGFORD CENTER 1.9 WNW CoCoRaHS 11.13 CT NEW CANAAN 1.9 ENE CoCoRaHS 11.06 CT LEDYARD 0.5 NE CoCoRaHS 11.04 CT WALLINGFORD CENTER 3.3 NNW CoCoRaHS 11.03 CT MIDDLEFIELD 1.4 W CoCoRaHS 10.97 CT MIDDLEFIELD 0.6 SE CoCoRaHS 10.96 CT RIDGEFIELD 3.6 N CoCoRaHS 10.92 NY CENTEREACH 1.3 NE CoCoRaHS 10.88 CT NORWALK 2.9 NNW CoCoRaHS 10.83 CT ANSONIA 1 NW COOP 10.78 NY STONY POINT 0.7 NW CoCoRaHS 10.73 CT STRATFORD 0.9 W CoCoRaHS 10.69 CT CROMWELL 0.4 WNW CoCoRaHS 10.62 CT WALLINGFORD CENTER 1.1 N CoCoRaHS 10.55 NJ RIVER EDGE 0.4 NNE CoCoRaHS 10.32 CT PROSPECT 1.9 ENE CoCoRaHS 10.31 NY PORT JERVIS COOP 10.30 CT LEDYARD 2.8 NNE CoCoRaHS 10.25 NJ MONTCLAIR 0.7 N CoCoRaHS 10.22 NJ FAIR LAWN 0.9 E CoCoRaHS 10.22 NY MOUNT SINAI COOP 10.21 CT NORWICH 5.4 SE CoCoRaHS 10.17 NJ WAYNE TWP 2.3 ESE CoCoRaHS 10.13 CT SHERMAN 1.2 E CoCoRaHS 10.13 CT HIGGANUM 0.7 N CoCoRaHS 10.13 CT HIGGANUM 0.8 NE CoCoRaHS 10.05 CT NORWICH 5.2 SE CoCoRaHS 10.04 CT WALLINGFORD 3.1 N CoCoRaHS 10.03

Today will be the last day for over a week with above normal temperatures in the upper 70's to near 80 degrees. We fall off to the upper 60's to low 70's tomorrow and with near record setting low maximum temperatures possible both Tuesday and Wednesday. High temperatures both of those days will struggle into the mid to upper 50's. Those temperatures are typical for November 10th! In addition to the unseasonable chill this week it will also be very wet. Rain chances increase by Sunday, and chances remain each and every day of the new work week. The in-house ChescoWx model predicts over 4 inches of rain this week!

Today will be the last day for over a week with above normal temperatures in the upper 70's to near 80 degrees. We fall off to the upper 60's to low 70's tomorrow and with near record setting low maximum temperatures possible both Tuesday and Wednesday. High temperatures both of those days will struggle into the mid to upper 50's. Those temperatures are typical for November 10th! In addition to the unseasonable chill this week it will also be very wet. Rain chances increase by Sunday, and chances remain each and every day of the new work week. The in-house ChescoWx model predicts over 4 inches of rain this week!