Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,666
    Total Members
    25,819
    Most Online
    tmcandrew
    Newest Member
    tmcandrew
    Joined

Winter 2026-2027. Historic Potential


Ji
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Ji said:


Looks good to me. It’s looking colder than what models had for 23-24 Nino

Long range models constantly had a 500mb trough over the Mid Atlantic, including the Euro. This held all Summer/Fall then in the Winter the long range Euro weeklies were constantly showing the same pattern, a trough over the Mid Atlantic. It didn't work out - 23-24 was the warmest winter on record for US. 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have enjoyed reading all the thoughts on this thread during the past hour.

I see that J.B. has defaulted to 97-98.   I pray that he is correct.  97-98 averaged +2.20 Nino, the ECMWF is closer to 3.00 for this coming winter.

As most realize, we are in a serious to extreme, drought.  To prevent hardship for many in our society, we need lots of rainfall or melted snow over an extended period of time.

I pray for a repeat of 97 - 98 because it was the wettest winter of any of 9 strong Nino's back to 1950. I received 22.62" of rain and melted snow compared to a normal 8.40" of precip. in DJF.  Regarding snowfall in 97-98, 33 inches was 9 inches above normal for Augusta County.

Regarding NAO or AO for Augusta snowfall ??   The NAO doesn't seem to be really important, but the AO should be firmly negative according to historical observations.  During 97-98 the AO averaged -2.00 and the NAO averaged about -.30".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GramaxRefugee said:

True.

Gold spun from straw, perhaps.

The thing about a strong El Nino winter is that expectations are always high but reality can sometimes be a disappointment.

72-73 at +2.00 only gave Augusta County 3.0" of snow.  86-87 at +1.60 gave Augusta 52" of snow. 91-92 at +2.30 only gave Augusta 3.3" of snow.  09 - 10 at +1.50 average gave Augusta 63" of snow. The thing about 09-10 is that both the NAO at -2.00 and the AO at -3.50 were strongly negative. I think that was important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...