Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,614
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    eloveday
    Newest Member
    eloveday
    Joined

“Cory’s in NYC! Let’s HECS!” Feb. 22-24 Disco


TheSnowman
 Share

Recommended Posts

If that trough axis can shift west just a tad more and dig a bit more this would be something. There is certainly enough time too to get a tick in that direction. That trailing s/w at 78 on GFS/Euro might just be screwing things up just a bit...you can tell this thing really wants to rip up just off the coast

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, weatherwiz said:

If that trough axis can shift west just a tad more and dig a bit more this would be something. There is certainly enough time too to get a tick in that direction. That trailing s/w at 78 on GFS/Euro might just be screwing things up just a bit...you can tell this thing really wants to rip up just off the coast

I'd love that to phase in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, weatherwiz said:

That would certainly be ideal. This or just become kind of a non player (though I understand it would taper back the overall potential). But if that can phase in we are game on. 

I still think it helps more than hurts. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

NAM has ensembles? Someone online just mentioned they are amped as hell...

I know that the SREF can’t be looked at individually, but it sure can be looked at from the perspective of trends. And doesn’t some of the stuff that feeds those models go into the NAM as well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dendrite said:

I still think it helps more than hurts. 

Inclined to lean that way too. Haven't put a whole lot of effort into this until last night/this morning and looking at past models it does seem to be a bit of a trend in that way, at least short term. We can only hope 12z continues in this direction. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Damage In Tolland said:

They’ve been talking about getting rid of the NAM for five years and never do 

I could be 1000000% wrong on this but I think the holdup with that is there still is alot of work which needs to be done with its replacement. The NAM still remains the only model really which handles CAD extremely well and seems to be best in situations with hung up fronts and nearby boundaries. Getting rid of the NAM right now could be pretty horrific in some forecasting situations 

  • Like 1
  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, weatherwiz said:

I could be 1000000% wrong on this but I think the holdup with that is there still is alot of work which needs to be done with its replacement. The NAM still remains the only model really which handles CAD extremely well and seems to be best in situations with hung up fronts and nearby boundaries. Getting rid of the NAM right now could be pretty horrific in some forecasting situations 

And mid level warm intrusions...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 40/70 Benchmark said:

And mid level warm intrusions...

Yup...can't believe I forgot to mention that and this probably supersedes what I mentioned in terms of importance. 

The NAM does have alot of strengths and unfortunately its weaknesses really suck but at least those are very easy to spot and understand.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

I’m sure they’ll shoe horn in the RRFS without it being ready. 

I don’t think so. They realized the one they were going to put into production was bad. The MPAS versions are already scoring better verifications….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...