Nomz Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 Bleh I lied. Struggling to get negative at h78 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 28 Author Share Posted January 28 Yeah, ICON is far worse than 18z 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 28 Author Share Posted January 28 1 minute ago, Nomz said: Bleh I lied. Struggling to get negative at h78 Not even sure how you saw a bomb when it was clearly east of 18z. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 28 Author Share Posted January 28 RGEM western lobe is a bit further west so far 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Climate175 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 2 minutes ago, stormtracker said: Yeah, not sure why we're analyzing a weather model here. Let's delve into the potential new flavors of Coca Cola. You got the jokes lol. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 2 minutes ago, DDweatherman said: I’ll give you 5 bucks if the euro looks like that. Buy me a drink at the next HH. If it trends worse from 18z first rounds on me 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 1 minute ago, stormtracker said: Not even sure how you saw a bomb when it was clearly east of 18z. Nothing about that run looked like it was going to work. Progressive as F lol 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bncho Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 Just now, stormtracker said: RGEM western lobe is a bit further west so far even more west than the 18z? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxdude64 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 2 minutes ago, stormtracker said: Yeah, not sure why we're analyzing a weather model here. Let's delve into the potential new flavors of Coca Cola. Is one of them the return of 'new'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 28 Author Share Posted January 28 1 minute ago, bncho said: even more west than the 18z? Yes, but nothing crazy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
overcautionisbad Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 ICON has spoken gg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 28 Author Share Posted January 28 1 minute ago, wxdude64 said: Is one of them the return of 'new'? God, I hope not 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDweatherman Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 1 minute ago, psuhoffman said: Buy me a drink at the next HH. If it trends worse from 18z first rounds on me Deal, I want to buy the first two if that’s the case Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 28 Author Share Posted January 28 RGEM now is noticeable further west 16 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayyy Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 ICON has spoken ggThe icon has never once, in its entire existence, spoken. 1 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobalt Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 1 minute ago, overcautionisbad said: ICON has spoken gg Weren't you just talking to a robot asking it to share secrets about the Weathernext's 18z run? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddy1987 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 1 minute ago, stormtracker said: RGEM now is noticeable further west I just looked at it and compared to the 18z gfs. Looks like we would want heights to rise a good bit more in the northeast. 0z RGEM pretty dang flat but yes it does look better in the Midwest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nomz Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 6 minutes ago, stormtracker said: Not even sure how you saw a bomb when it was clearly east of 18z. I was more looking at the western extent of the northern vort. Looked a little bit closer to negative too imo. (Icon left gfs right) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ephesians2 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 So at 72h... the RGEM looks even further west with the NS energy than even the GFS/NAM EDIT: it is flatter in front though 5 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDweatherman Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 Just now, Ephesians2 said: So at 72h... the RGEM looks even further west with the NS energy than even the GFS/NAM Should give it move time to round the base and try to get negative for us. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 28 Author Share Posted January 28 1 minute ago, Buddy1987 said: I just looked at it and compared to the 18z gfs. Looks like we would want heights to rise a good bit more in the northeast. 0z RGEM pretty dang flat but yes it does look better in the Midwest. Yeah, I'm waiting to see what it does when it forms the closed low Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weather Will Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 OZ ICON does bring snow to eastern NC. 18Z did not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bncho Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 Whatever the RGEM shows will be shown on the CMC. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solution Man Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 1 minute ago, Nomz said: I was more looking at the western extent of the northern vort. Looked a little more progressive too imo. (Icon left gfs right) 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Climate175 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 2 minutes ago, Cobalt said: Weren't you just talking to a robot asking it to share secrets about the Weathernext's 18z run? I admit I asked it myself but it literally was for a laugh lol. Back to regular scheduled programming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 28 Author Share Posted January 28 1 minute ago, Ephesians2 said: So at 72h... the RGEM looks even further west with the NS energy than even the GFS/NAM Ya don't say? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobalt Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 3 minutes ago, Buddy1987 said: I just looked at it and compared to the 18z gfs. Looks like we would want heights to rise a good bit more in the northeast. 0z RGEM pretty dang flat but yes it does look better in the Midwest. Some of this seems to be timing also? RGEM looks to be a few hours slower with the entire sequence of events than it was for 18z. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
overcautionisbad Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 4 minutes ago, Cobalt said: Weren't you just talking to a robot asking it to share secrets about the Weathernext's 18z run? I tend to joke a lot to relieve tension. Haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted January 28 Author Share Posted January 28 RGEM is positive step vs 18z, but NAM is better. I call it a win tho 8 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 1 minute ago, Cobalt said: Some of this seems to be timing also? RGEM looks to be a few hours slower with the entire sequence of events than it was for 18z. yea its slower.may not be more west 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now