Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,635
    Total Members
    25,819
    Most Online
    Donut Hole
    Newest Member
    Donut Hole
    Joined

January 24-26: Miracle or Mirage Thread 2


mappy
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, SnowtoRain said:

I would be interested to know what they are looking at to make that prediction. I haven't seen the midshore above 12" on any model run recently.

GFS and UKie have been close but cant imagine they are riding with that combo lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NorthArlington101 said:


I may have blinked and missed things today but I thought we were supposed to wake up to more than 2” at 6am. I’m willing to cave to being wrong, though. Guess every flake sticks even if it’s not heavy from midnight-6.

Taken literally and using Kuchera, FV3 has us at 4-6" at 7am. I'm not saying it's right, but that's what it says. 

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Terpeast said:

Thanks for pointing that out. The 12k and 3k might as well be two different models. May sound like a weenie, but I’d lean more on the 3k within 48 hours of onset. 

 

        They differ in more than just resolution, so they effectively are two different models (even though they have obvious commonalities).    As you said, though, the 3 km is a far superior model, except for when it deepens hurricanes down to 850 mb.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wxmeddler said:

Such a flawed core (Sorry to all those at EMC, you all do great work), MPAS for the win.

Okay I'm about to go super weenie here, but that's where I am mentally. You probably already know this, but per this paper, the FV3 is being retired as well when RRFS comes online: https://journals.ametsoc.org/downloadpdf/view/journals/bams/aop/BAMS-D-25-0323.1/BAMS-D-25-0323.1.pdf

The RRFS switched to MPAS for v2, which is (I believe) what we're watching slowly roll in. Supposedly, even v1 outperformed most high-res models, with some reflectively issues that have hopefully been resolved per that paper. 

I'll stop now. :weenie:

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wxdude64 said:

Temps at a first glance, but I have a hard time thinking it would be off that much ?

    Big warm layers can easily reside in between those two levels.   Some of the forecast soundings I have seen for this event show that exact scenario.    The NAM precip type code is rock solid, based on the forecasted temperature profile.

  • Like 4
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...