Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    masonj4
    Newest Member
    masonj4
    Joined

“Cory’s in LA! Let’s MECS!” Jan. 24-26 Disco


TheSnowman
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, 8611Blizz said:

It's been a good ten years since Boston has been hit with anything like this and the new residents are in for a shock. Uber eats delays for days...

Huh? BOS had 2' in Jan 2022. Maybe didn't hit west of FIT-ORH-BDL but BOS certainly got it. https://www.jdjweatherconsulting.com/jan-28-29-2022

2018 had two storms with >12" of snow, Jan and Mar.

Before that, yes, you have to go back to 2015.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ariof said:

Huh? BOS had 2' in Jan 2022. Maybe didn't hit west of FIT-ORH-BDL but BOS certainly got it. https://www.jdjweatherconsulting.com/jan-28-29-2022

2018 had two storms with >12" of snow, Jan and Mar.

Before that, yes, you have to go back to 2015.

Yeah that was somewhat similar as far as amounts go but this looking significantly bigger and much longer duration.  Not mention the cold after this one is long lasting. So no melting  really at all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dendrite said:

AI goofus still paltry for New England

But this is an example of where I think AI is just broadly spreading QPF rather than honing in on details. That’s a lot more QPF in NNE vs deterministic models and less in SNE.

image.png

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Yea, here we go....subby city.

The saggy subsidence boobs for the CT and MR valleys are definitely showing up on guidance. Assuming we may have to endure periods of baking soda under mediocre lift in subsidence. Thinking more like 10-15’’ here…still pretty good of course but don’t think we have much of a chance at the higher end totals. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, dendrite said:

But this is an example of where I think AI is just broadly spreading QPF rather than honing in on details. That’s a lot more QPF in NNE vs deterministic models and less in SNE.

image.png

Agreed. They did well sniffing out this storm but as we got within 72hrs I think we need to weigh them less heavily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

You’re in a great spot. Both for CF enhancement during the WAA thump and then for onshore flow on Monday. 

Especially on EURO....I'm just nervous of wind backing more NE and 850 flow weakening or shifting.....I just want to avoid getting Dec 2003, PD II, Jan 2022ed...not asking for a jack, but just avoid getting 12" while surrounding areas have 20-30". :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Especially on EURO....I'm just nervous of wind backing more NE and 850 flow weakening or shifting.....I just want about getting Dec 2003, PD II, Jan 2022ed...not asking for a jack, but just avoid getting 12" while surrounding areas have 20-30". :lol:

I doubt this storm will have those types of crazy snowfall gradients. There will obviously be some enhanced areas but prob more like someone getting 19” or 20” versus 15” instead of 25-burgers 10 miles away from a foot. 

The massive thump should be relatively uniform 10-15” and then anything on top of that will probably be Monday onshore flow stuff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...