NJwx85 Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACRUS Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycsnow Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACRUS Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbenedet Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 2 minutes ago, NJwx85 said: NYC metro has biggest upside potential. The surface high position/intensity and antecedent is pretty well perfect. It’s one of the rare times to bet against the “warming 925 - 800 into go time” 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycsnow Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 lol Nam is such a clown model 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MANDA Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 26 minutes ago, NJwx85 said: I"m going to need to see some support from the 00Z CMC RDPS / HRDPS before I give much weight to this. If it is onto something both the RDPS and HRDPS should start to see it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycsnow Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 1 minute ago, MANDA said: I"m going to need to see some support from the 00Z CMC RDPS / HRDPS before I give much weight to this. If it is onto something both the RDPS and HRDPS should start to see it. They were there @ 18z Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycsnow Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 Fv3 as mix starts in metro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowlover11 Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 Nam is unchanged from its 18z run Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winterweatherlover Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 NAM doesn't seem to be backing down, if anything maybe a touch warmer than 18z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe4alb Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 Of course it is! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 1 minute ago, Snowlover11 said: Nam is unchanged from its 18z run 1 minute ago, Winterweatherlover said: NAM doesn't seem to be backing down, if anything maybe a touch warmer than 18z. Its actually slightly south with the sleet. Coastal is east. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 Fv3 is great 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJwx85 Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 The NAM is actually a touch warmer. At this point I think it’s just noise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kat5hurricane Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 As I suspected the NAM isn't backing down, it's been pretty consistent. Whether or not that means it's correct is another story but you can't discount this potential solution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winterwarlock Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 Nam will lead the way 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormlover74 Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 3k change. A little better in some spots worse in others 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 Just now, Winterweatherlover said: NAM doesn't seem to be backing down, if anything maybe a touch warmer than 18z. At this point the NAM is probably overdone a little with the warmth but it has something of a clue. I believe it more than the cold HRRR/RAP that I’ve seen come in too cold in SWFE setups. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winterweatherlover Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 NAM is way different than the other models in terms of the snow amounts in southern Ohio and southern PA. We'll probably know by tomorrow morning if the NAM is onto something or lost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycsnow Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 Just now, jm1220 said: At this point the NAM is probably overdone a little with the warmth but it has something of a clue. I believe it more than the cold HRRR/RAP that I’ve seen come in too cold in SWFE setups. Nam 3k don’t even agree it’s a bit colder and snowier Nam is literally on its owns there’s gonna be a point where people stop giving it so much credit. Nothing is trending to it 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACRUS Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 1/26 00z NAM QPF storm Snow: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycsnow Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 Just now, Winterweatherlover said: NAM is way different than the other models in terms of the snow amounts in southern Ohio and southern PA. We'll probably know by tomorrow morning if the NAM is onto something or lost. From Little Rock to Carolina’s NAM has been off all day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 2 minutes ago, winterwarlock said: Nam will lead the way You dont know that. People bash the Nam all the time and now its right ? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowman92 Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 Mixing line seems to be further south then modeled at the moment. Not by a lot but noticeable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 2 minutes ago, Winterweatherlover said: NAM is way different than the other models in terms of the snow amounts in southern Ohio and southern PA. We'll probably know by tomorrow morning if the NAM is onto something or lost. We’ll know in the morning as the snow shield comes into the area. We need the hellacious thump the RGEM models and HRRR/RAP show. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kat5hurricane Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 1 minute ago, jm1220 said: We’ll know in the morning as the snow shield comes into the area. We need the hellacious thump the RGEM models and HRRR/RAP show. The RGEM showing the big thump gives me some hope, and the UKIE as well. I can't much if any stock into what the HRRR and RAP show, they almost always run on the cold side. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 2 minutes ago, SACRUS said: 1/26 00z NAM QPF storm Snow: Well, if there’s 5” of snow at 10-1 ratio (0.5” liquid) then 1” liquid as sleet, that’s 8” total with sleet at 3:1 ratio. And again I don’t think this is gospel correct but it’s been consistent enough today to think it has to be onto something since it’s usually a little better at finding these warm layers, although it often overdoes it somewhat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psv88 Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 4 minutes ago, SACRUS said: 1/26 00z NAM QPF storm Snow: NAM shows 1.4” of QPF has 7” of snow in NW NJ. I don’t buy it 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 Just now, psv88 said: NAM shows 1.4” of QPF has 7” of snow in NW NJ. I don’t buy it I’m sure it’s somewhat excessive. It probably jumps the sleet line all the way to I-84 still. You can see how the amounts drop from Monticello area to I-84. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now