Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,484
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    RHiggins
    Newest Member
    RHiggins
    Joined

First Legit Storm Potential of the Season Upon Us


40/70 Benchmark
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, 40/70 Benchmark said:

IDK, I wouldn't hammer mid level banding too much....looks like it's past us by the time H85 closes, NVM H7.

That's the direction I am leaning towards. I've spent the past hour just looking at anything and everything relating to storm evolution and it's really difficult to come to a conclusion that the mid-levels develop in time to really produce. If it does happen...this is going to be a big overperformer and I would still expect that to be within the CT River Valley...but just not seeing enough to bite and expect it will happen. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

Heading up Wednesday morning…they’re in great shape. Picked up 7-8” yesterday.  Hope your trip was great Jeff. 

Wet snow going over to the forks, 105 miles thurs, My port on my sled for the heated shield is not working, Rode with my helmet open and continuous wiping the vizer and my glasses fogging up, Sucked, Good thing it wasn't yesterday, 5°F, Rode my 2020 Enduro, No problem with the heated shield but dropped my sled off at Wallingfords for them to look at seeing it was working before they worked on it last spring.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Well ... for starters, I gave you plenty - and so did others:   no one can (apparently) define the discrete processes in the construct of these tools.   

For all we know, if they ever succeed(fail) it may just be dumb fuck luck.  This situation is no different.   

This is the logical and the correct approach. 

It certainly may come off as a trophy wave time - firstly, nothing's happened yet.  Secondly, even these tools wavered E at one time or the other over the last 30 hour's worth of cycles. So they are back?   I can tell you meteorologically why these runs are coming back, without using "blind" model methods - which they are ... until such time as these organization(s) et all put out knowledge-based tell-out educational prospecti about the math and philosophies of these instruments. 

Until that happens, you'll get burned one day, eventually ... if you don't know what it is you are dealing with.   

True-but most disparage without having any idea why.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

That's the direction I am leaning towards. I've spent the past hour just looking at anything and everything relating to storm evolution and it's really difficult to come to a conclusion that the mid-levels develop in time to really produce. If it does happen...this is going to be a big overperformer and I would still expect that to be within the CT River Valley...but just not seeing enough to bite and expect it will happen. 

Yea, I have been aggressive on this from the get-go, aside from when I got skiddish last night, but I don't see enough evidence that the kicker will allow this to congeal enough in the vicinity of our area to have those mid levels close quickly enough.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Yea, I have been aggressive on this from the get-go, aside from when I got skiddish last night, but I don't see enough evidence that the kicker will allow this to congeal enough in the vicinity of our area to have those mid levels close quickly enough.

Anyways at least this looks like a good solid regionwide 3-6" event. Don't want anyone interpret the discussion of the mid-levels meaning this is cooked lol. Just moreso trying to gauge what's the upper ceiling we're working with here

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TauntonBlizzard2013 said:

It kinds of looks like it a bit, because Will is right, it did look more amped to start.

Could be real though 

yup...sucks when you get this convective chasing crap because there is no way to know for sure if its accurate until the event is unfolding. It also gets going just a tad too late...you can see if trying to recover and build NW at hr 30-33

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Typhoon Tip said:

 I can tell you meteorologically why these runs are coming back, without using "blind" model methods - which they are ... until such time as these organization(s) et all put out knowledge-based tell-out educational prospecti about the math and philosophies of these instruments. 

The whole point of AI...the human race doesn't need to think anymore, it will be done for us by machines...at least until they decide we are unnecessary!

Moo haha

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Looks like hrrr shaved a tad off. Still a good look

 

What's this rear weenie bonus convectivey-NORLUN type stuff at the end???  12z had it as well.  Nothing would surprise me given how odd this season is so far w/ local snow maxes!


 

hrrr3.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...