Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,672
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    dorkchop
    Newest Member
    dorkchop
    Joined

January 2026 Medium/Long Range Discussion


snowfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, RevWarReenactor said:

I guess now we know how Jan 25, 2000 happened and December 2000 didn't. Very very slight changes mean huge differences. This will probably come down to the wire, especially for eastern areas.

agree. considering the range on snowfall for MBY is 0.02(euro) to 36"+(GFS), id say there are two distinct camps, lol

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 9.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

2 minutes ago, Thanatos_I_Am said:

Appreciate the insight. Trying to follow here, is the advection lobe you are referring to the feature over the Midwest? I see the issues in SE Canada, just want to understand the first part of your post. Thanks! 

Yes, the last frame of that forecast trend loop shows a local vorticity maximum over Southern Michigan that becomes the primary later. The AI models and GFS are mostly favoring the far western portion of the axis instead. Sloppy as it is, the EC has slowly been heading that way since the 00Z run. If it mostly consolidates on the far end (west) of the trough axis then that gives the entire system considerably more room to develop.

  • Like 13
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, csnavywx said:

Yes, the last frame of that forecast trend loop shows a local vorticity maximum over Southern Michigan that becomes the primary later. The AI models and GFS are mostly favoring the far western portion of the axis instead. Sloppy as it is, the EC has slowly been heading that way since the 00Z run. If it mostly consolidates on the far end (west) of the trough axis then that gives the entire system considerably more room to develop.

Are we close to something? Isn’t there exponential growth regarding how quickly the shortwave tilts negative, e.g. if it tilts negative 6 hours earlier it goes from OTS to I-95 blizzard?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, csnavywx said:

Yes, the last frame of that forecast trend loop shows a local vorticity maximum over Southern Michigan that becomes the primary later. The AI models and GFS are mostly favoring the far western portion of the axis instead. Sloppy as it is, the EC has slowly been heading that way since the 00Z run. If it mostly consolidates on the far end (west) of the trough axis then that gives the entire system considerably more room to develop.

So is that what it was doing at 6z yesterday morning before it lost it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, AlexD1990 said:

agree. considering the range on snowfall for MBY is 0.02(euro) to 36"+(GFS), id say there are two distinct camps, lol

Its should probably end up a split so I would plan on 12-18 as a floor.  That’s what I’m seeing right now after three boxes of pizza rolls, and two glasses of Jack Daniels.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Snowciopathic Snow Bro said:

The Kalshi prediciton market model says no big snow before end of month.  DCA is the respresentative obs station, so good luck to all of the betting folks with that.

Screenshot 2026-01-27 135805.png

TBF, even in the most optimistic models, snow doesn't really hit the ground till after the turn of the month

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, bncho said:

Are we close to something? Isn’t there exponential growth regarding how quickly the shortwave tilts negative, e.g. if it tilts negative 6 hours earlier it goes from OTS to I-95 blizzard?

Highly non-linear cutoff here. Modeling is almost certainly underdispersed atm.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just checked the mean on the EPS 12z ....its actually a big improvement from the 0z  (dont have access to the 6z)  as some have said there are a handful 4-6 members that are likely skewing the mean a bit from being further west and even a touch north.....also notice 2 clusters that are considerable west and another that are northwest of the mean....i think this trends somewhat west the next few runs.....how much remains to be seen.....if I were on the coast I would still be quite optimistic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean no doubt the odds are low, but 64 (or however many the Euro has) ensemble members hardly probe the entire space of perturbations. I wouldn’t call it a complete model failure if we get some flakes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, BristowWx said:

Its should probably end up a split so I would plan on 12-18 as a floor.  That’s what I’m seeing right now after three boxes of pizza rolls, and two glasses of Jack Daniels.

On the Euro and GFS at 500 MB, what, if anything is north of the storm's evolution which eventually may push it to the east or northeast?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...