Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,459
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    kmsrocknj
    Newest Member
    kmsrocknj
    Joined

January 2026 Medium/Long Range Discussion


snowfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Scarlet Pimpernel said:

Exactly, I agree.  Yeah, we all get a bit frustrated or disappointed when there's nothing much specific on the horizon in terms of snow events.  Or when the models go all over the place, creating the inevitable mood swings.  And even a bit of venting is OK.  However, as you say, the constant bitching with page after page of the same people whining that "it's over!!!" gets really old and detracts from the actual discussion.

Can people still be five-posted (as has been done in storm threads upon occasion)?  Like if someone posts a bunch of whiny BS and nothing more several times succession in any of the discussion threads (medium range or for specific events), they get five-posted for awhile.

I'd be on board with that. Shoot these days I 5-post myself if when I'm feeling a certain kind of way, lol But yeah if I had a vote I'd say do that...it would help everybody. If you're frustrated it does not good to vent continuously--because it only perpetuates a bad mood and ya don't feel better!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, WxUSAF said:

GFSAI has some digital blue in fantasy range. Everyone get a little hit to tide you over. First hit is free, then you gotta pay.

Was loading up a jaws at the end too. Nice run. Step back from the ledge my friends!

Eta: waiting for someone to chime in and overanalyze hr 384 on the ai and remind me the hp is pulling away and how we lose in that setup :lol:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, bncho said:

 

BAM WX says that January -AAM/MJO 6 analogs since 1990 favor cold for most of the central and eastern US. Whether this is 100% true is questionable, but it's still interesting to note.

bam is doing everything it can to save face

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bncho said:

 

BAM WX says that January -AAM/MJO 6 analogs since 1990 favor cold for most of the central and eastern US. Whether this is 100% true is questionable, but it's still interesting to note.

This is BAMwx’s image: see lower right…that coldest area over the SE is ~-6 to -7 F for Jan -AAM phase 6s:

IMG_6639.thumb.jpeg.dcdf3f6d268f1997b643f58d8e74a3f3.jpeg
 

 The following are results of my research, which looked at GSP, a station in that coldest (pink) area, during La Niña Jans on that lower right map:

 

Niña Year….# phase 6 days in Jan…avg anomaly

1975…3…-8 M

1976…13…-9 W-S

1989…3…+8 M

1999…3…+2 M

2000…3…-4 W

2006…6…+3 S

2008…3…+8 S

2009…6…+1 W-M

2011…12…-7 W-S

2012…19…+1 W-S

2017…2…0 W

2018…3…-2 S

2021…8…-1 M-S

2022…4…-9 W

2025…2…-5 W

W weak (mainly in or near circle), M mod., S strong

91 total days (big sample)

 So, not surprisingly, there’s a wide spread. But the overall avg temp. anomaly at GSP during La Niña Jan phase 6s over the last 50 years did avg out to -2 F, a bit counterintuitive. So, this tells me two things:
 

- Any possible phase 6 this month won’t necessarily favor mild in the E US though the spread is wide and it could end up that way

- BAMwx’s -6 to -7 area in the SE and that map in general is significantly too cold for La Niña Jan phase 6. Only 6 of the 15 periods (40%) were about as cold as BAMwx. But the 40% does show a -6 to -7ish phase 6 this month would be doable.

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, stormtracker said:

It gets worse every day.  That’s why I barely come here anymore.  We live in a region where it doesn’t snow or stay cold from December to March. Go figure. 

We used to have so many participants here and hundreds and hundreds when a snow event was looming.  Not nearly so nowdays and it’s not the nature of the participants but rather changing dynamics and clueless, unstable models 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, GaWx said:

This is BAMwx’s image: see lower right…that coldest area over the SE is ~-6 to -7 F for Jan -AAM phase 6s:

IMG_6639.thumb.jpeg.dcdf3f6d268f1997b643f58d8e74a3f3.jpeg
 

 The following are results of my research, which looked at GSP, a station in that coldest (pink) area, during La Niña Jans on that lower right map:

 

Niña Year….# phase 6 days in Jan…avg anomaly

1975…3…-8 M

1976…13…-9 W-S

1989…3…+8 M

1999…3…+2 M

2000…3…-4 W

2006…6…+3 S

2008…3…+8 S

2009…6…+1 W-M

2011…12…-7 W-S

2012…19…+1 W-S

2017…2…0 W

2018…3…-2 S

2021…8…-1 M-S

2022…4…-9 W

2025…2…-5 W

W weak (mainly in or near circle), M mod., S strong

91 total days (big sample)

 So, not surprisingly, there’s a wide spread. But the overall avg temp. anomaly at GSP during La Niña Jan phase 6s over the last 50 years did avg out to -2 F, a bit counterintuitive. So, this tells me two things:
 

- Any possible phase 6 this month won’t necessarily favor mild in the E US though the spread is wide and it could end up that way

- BAMwx’s -6 to -7 area in the SE and that map in general is significantly too cold for La Niña Jan phase 6. Only 6 of the 15 periods (40%) were about as cold as BAMwx. But the 40% does show a -6 to -7ish phase 6 this month would be doable.

 

Excellent work as always GaWx.  My initial thought is how is this correlation with phase 6 when you consider the SST anomaly not being significant?  DT was suggesting we are basically near neutral at this point.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, GaWx said:

This is BAMwx’s image: see lower right…that coldest area over the SE is ~-6 to -7 F for Jan -AAM phase 6s:

IMG_6639.thumb.jpeg.dcdf3f6d268f1997b643f58d8e74a3f3.jpeg
 

 The following are results of my research, which looked at GSP, a station in that coldest (pink) area, during La Niña Jans on that lower right map:

 

Niña Year….# phase 6 days in Jan…avg anomaly

1975…3…-8 M

1976…13…-9 W-S

1989…3…+8 M

1999…3…+2 M

2000…3…-4 W

2006…6…+3 S

2008…3…+8 S

2009…6…+1 W-M

2011…12…-7 W-S

2012…19…+1 W-S

2017…2…0 W

2018…3…-2 S

2021…8…-1 M-S

2022…4…-9 W

2025…2…-5 W

W weak (mainly in or near circle), M mod., S strong

91 total days (big sample)

 So, not surprisingly, there’s a wide spread. But the overall avg temp. anomaly at GSP during La Niña Jan phase 6s over the last 50 years did avg out to -2 F, a bit counterintuitive. So, this tells me two things:
 

- Any possible phase 6 this month won’t necessarily favor mild in the E US though the spread is wide and it could end up that way

- BAMwx’s -6 to -7 area in the SE and that map in general is significantly too cold for La Niña Jan phase 6. Only 6 of the 15 periods (40%) were about as cold as BAMwx. But the 40% does show a -6 to -7ish phase 6 this month would be doable.

 

Excellent analysis. I wonder why MJO 6 leans cold with -AAM… but thank you so much!

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, GaWx said:

This is BAMwx’s image: see lower right…that coldest area over the SE is ~-6 to -7 F for Jan -AAM phase 6s:

IMG_6639.thumb.jpeg.dcdf3f6d268f1997b643f58d8e74a3f3.jpeg
 

 The following are results of my research, which looked at GSP, a station in that coldest (pink) area, during La Niña Jans on that lower right map:

 

Niña Year….# phase 6 days in Jan…avg anomaly

1975…3…-8 M

1976…13…-9 W-S

1989…3…+8 M

1999…3…+2 M

2000…3…-4 W

2006…6…+3 S

2008…3…+8 S

2009…6…+1 W-M

2011…12…-7 W-S

2012…19…+1 W-S

2017…2…0 W

2018…3…-2 S

2021…8…-1 M-S

2022…4…-9 W

2025…2…-5 W

W weak (mainly in or near circle), M mod., S strong

91 total days (big sample)

 So, not surprisingly, there’s a wide spread. But the overall avg temp. anomaly at GSP during La Niña Jan phase 6s over the last 50 years did avg out to -2 F, a bit counterintuitive. So, this tells me two things:
 

- Any possible phase 6 this month won’t necessarily favor mild in the E US though the spread is wide and it could end up that way

- BAMwx’s -6 to -7 area in the SE and that map in general is significantly too cold for La Niña Jan phase 6. Only 6 of the 15 periods (40%) were about as cold as BAMwx. But the 40% does show a -6 to -7ish phase 6 this month would be doable.

 

 Umm I always thought phase 6 was a warm phase..  this shows a cold phase  with a. Deep trough in east ... Hmm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the issue is everything is out of sync. there is nothing lining up that gets us cold with moisture. When there is a rare Southern Stream moment...its too warm. When its cold...we are relying on a a clipper diving down. None of things will really work

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ji said:

the issue is everything is out of sync. there is nothing lining up that gets us cold with moisture. When there is a rare Southern Stream moment...its too warm. When its cold...we are relying on a a clipper diving down. None of things will really work

 It's gotta line up one of these times !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, winter_warlock said:

 Umm I always thought phase 6 was a warm phase..  this shows a cold phase  with a. Deep trough in east ... Hmm

 As I said, I think BAMwx is significantly too cold in the means (which is what their map is supposed to represent). That pink area of -6 to -7 in the SE is, in reality (based on actual data that I analyzed) more like -2 along with much variation. And I didn’t analyze it for the entire E half of the US, which would take too long. If I get time, I could add a city like Baltimore, however, just to get an idea for this forum’s area.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...