Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,630
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    masonj4
    Newest Member
    masonj4
    Joined

Central PA Winter 25/26 Discussion and Obs


MAG5035
 Share

Recommended Posts

Also I keep hearing about how warm the ocean is and thats another reason why the warm air wins out for some areas turns it to sleet. But we are in the heart of winter and its been pretty cold even before this artic blast. But the funny thing about that is the temps are colder now then what they have been for other storms and they didnt say anything about the ocean temps then??

  • Crap 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been watching a live stream on YouTube on and off. Already seeing this over perform in terms of snowfall in places like Arkansas and Kentucky. My BIL in Kentucky had to go out a few hours earlier than expected to do snow removal. Hopefully that translates down the line, when we get in the goods. Back to my pre storm nap lol

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jns2183 said:

The statistical distribution of the 18 model forecasts for Harrisburg reveals a tightly clustered consensus with a specific high-end skew, indicating that while a significant winter storm is certain, the exact "boom" potential remains tied to moisture efficiency. The ensemble mean of 12.72 inches serves as the mathematical anchor, but the standard deviation of 3.11 inches highlights a notable disagreement between model families. Specifically, regional models like the NAM and SREF are pulling the distribution toward the 90th percentile of 16.38 inches, whereas global models like the GDPS and ICON remain more conservative near the 11th-inch mark. This spread suggests that the primary forecast challenge is not the track of the storm, but the Snow-to-Liquid Ratio (SLR); models predicting lower totals generally expect a warmer, denser "heart-attack" snow, while the high-end outliers assume a colder, fluffier accumulation.
The implications of this distribution, particularly when viewed through the lens of the Z-score mapping, suggest that the "most likely" outcome is not a single number but a high-confidence corridor. The data shows that 68% of all model guidance (the +/- 1.0 standard deviation range) falls between 9.61 and 15.82 inches, creating a very stable target for infrastructure planning. The fact that the Mean Absolute Deviation (MAE) is a relatively low 2.36 inches indicates that the models are in better agreement than typical for a complex transition-zone event. However, the 100-mile Northwest bias observed in Arkansas—where models like the NAM missed the core entirely—suggests that the statistical "tail" of the distribution should not be ignored. If the storm over-performs its moisture transport as it did upstream, the 17.38-inch mark (+1.5 sigma) is a scientifically plausible outcome rather than just an outlier.
Based on this statistical synthesis, the final forecast range for Harrisburg is set at 11 to 16 inches, with a localized "boom" potential of 18 inches if the higher SLRs verify. This range captures the bulk of the probability density, spanning from the 25th percentile (11.35") to just below the 90th percentile (16.38"). The lower bound is protected by the consistent 1.00"+ QPF (liquid equivalent) seen across almost all guidance, which provides a high floor for accumulation. Conversely, the upper bound is capped by the warm-nose intrusion observed in the regional NAM runs, which currently prevents the consensus from shifting entirely into the 20-inch category.

20260124_165517.jpg20260124_165501.jpg20260124_165458.jpgimage.jpg

Sent from my SM-S731U using Tapatalk
 

Youre a friggin wiz kid....

even if youre not a kid.

Impressive work bud.  

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I made a leading indicator watchlist for tonight starting at 1am

This Final Accumulation Decision Matrix is designed to give you a definitive forecast range for Harrisburg based on which leading indicator stations verify tomorrow morning.

Key Decision Thresholds for Tomorrow
* The 5:00 AM "Lynchburg Check": If KLYH (Lynchburg) is still reporting pure snow at 5:00 AM, the NAM's 11:00 AM sleet arrival for Harrisburg is effectively impossible. You can immediately shift your planning toward the 15"+ range.
* The "Sleet Ratio" Penalty: For every hour the "warm nose" arrives earlier than 6:00 PM, you lose approximately 0.6 to 0.8 inches of potential snow accumulation as the ratio drops from 13:1 to 6:1.
* The QPF Floor: Regardless of the timing, all high-resolution models agree on a liquid equivalent (QPF) of 1.0" to 1.3" for Harrisburg. This guarantees that even a "sleet-heavy" outcome will likely result in at least 9–10 inches of dense, frozen mass.
Final Forecast Recommendation
Stick with the 11"–16" range as your baseline, but keep a close eye on Fredericksburg (KEZF). That station is your "Early Warning System"—if they are still snow at 8:00 AM, the HRRR's 18-inch solution is no longer just a possibility; it becomes the most likely outcome.



1769299820112.thumb.jpg.9fd203948c8e4da88b95ccfdd77ad1b3.jpg

Sent from my SM-S731U using Tapatalk



Screenshot_2026-01-24_192434.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...