Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,326
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    happyclam13
    Newest Member
    happyclam13
    Joined

November 2025 general discussions and probable topic derailings ...


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

10" of snow on the Gulf coast last year..I barely got that all of January. Like, enough....just enough.  I swear to god, if it happens this season I'm going to absolutely go off of the deep end.

You went way off the deep end at least 3 years ago. Need a deeper pool. 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, HoarfrostHubb said:

Ray is being triggered. 

 

3 minutes ago, HoarfrostHubb said:

I wouldn’t mind some more days where I can get stuff done outdoors without putting on multiple layers. 

Correct on both accounts.

I haven't even started raking...def need some decent days with light wind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Even the cold shots...not just snow. I see all of these headlines about how Deerorgy, Minnesota dipped to -24 with -60 WCs, and 20s to the Gulf coast....meanwhile, back at the ranch....27 and P Cloudy in Methuen-

Fwiw - the models have been attenuating the cold air mass all along, showing rising thickness en masse within the trough for days of guidance cycles. 

That may not be much consolation reading that. I know. 

This whole trough and cold snap ( primarily west of our longitude) was originally modeled by the GFS about 8 or 9 days ago to generate an impressive coastal with implications from N-PA to interior SNE. By D6 the guidance went away from that idea. The trough morphed into more of a meridian type with EC parallel flow.

In fact, over these last 6 days there's been very good model performance overall for poorly consolidated low turning up through PA into eastern Ontario.  Can't say the Euro or the GGEM were much different - they seemed to get on that same page a while ago, too.

From my perspective, the models are having trouble with the idiosyncratic -NAO ...  gee what's new.   But back some 2.5 weeks ago the long range numerical outlooks showed a collapsing index in the NAO.  That actually verified ... the index numbers are in fact negative and have been.  What's fascinating is that synoptic layout is not representing that exertion ... sometimes that happens, though rarer.  As it were, the cyclone still turned left prior to 90 W and ended up NY state - in other words, despite -2 SD NAO in the derivatives, the former behavior was really more nuetral NAO like.   It all shows how difficult the NAO is to work with.   The PNA was left to it's one devices ... and the trough amplifies too early/maximizes west. 

That idea of commitment to a coastal made more sense relative to the numerology back whence.  This "could" have been the season's first synoptic run in.  +1 SD PNA with a failing western exerted -NAO?  If I were seeing that index outlook from 12 days ago I'd be just as inclined to watching the coastal storm routes for eventual operational emergence.  Just the way it goes. You know, we've often reminded folks that all these teleconnectors, air, sea and combinations therein and et al, they are never 1::1.  There's always exceptions.  Just be glad it happened now, prior to thanks giggedy, when there's still 4 some odd month's worth of other scenarios for the atmosphere to anti-correlate new and exciting ways to tune up winter enthusiast's dignities like a chef with a steak hammer...  :lol:

Anyway, failed humor aside ... it helps to have some explanation.  Not to be high handed or anything but ... heh, I honestly walked away from this whole synoptic era pretty early in the game, as I could see this unfolding like 5 days ago.   I've seen this before when the indexes may derive positive or negative field values despite the behavior not being perfectly aligned - it's rare ... but if there is going to be a time of the year where that is more likely to anti-correlate, its at this time of year and sometimes in April

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

We are due for weather excitement. 

2025 may be the most boring calendar year of our lives....Maybe 1988 or 1990? 1988 had the huge heat in the summer at least...1990 had a nice ice storm in March. This year has had absolute-dick. I think it's the most boring calendar years of our lives.

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Fwiw - the models have been attenuating the cold air mass all along, showing rising thickness en masse within the trough for days of guidance cycles. 

That may not be much consolation reading that. I know. 

This whole trough and cold snap ( primarily west of our longitude) was originally modeled by the GFS about 8 or 9 days ago to generate an impressive coastal with implications from N-PA to interior SNE. By D6 the guidance went away from that idea. The trough morphed into more of a meridian type with EC parallel flow.

In fact, over these last 6 days there's been very good model performance overall for poorly consolidated low turning up through PA into eastern Ontario.  Can't say the Euro or the GGEM were much different - they seemed to get on that same page a while ago, too.

From my perspective, the models are having trouble with the idiosyncratic -NAO ...  gee what's new.   But back some 2.5 weeks ago the long range numerical outlooks showed a collapsing index in the NAO.  That actually verified ... the index numbers are in fact negative and have been.  What's fascinating is that synoptic layout is not representing that exertion ... sometimes that happens, though rarer.  As it were, the cyclone still turned left prior to 90 W and ended up NY state - in other words, despite -2 SD NAO in the derivatives, the former behavior was really more nuetral NAO like.   It all shows how difficult the NAO is to work with.   The PNA was left to it's one devices ... and the trough amplifies too early/maximizes west. 

That idea of commitment to a coastal made more sense relative to the numerology back whence.  This "could have" been the season's first synoptic run in.  +1 SD PNA with a failing western exerted -NAO?  If I were seeing that index outlook from 12 days ago I'd be just as inclined to watching the coastal storm routes for eventual operational emergence.  Just the way it goes. You know, we've often reminded folks that all these teleconnectors, air, sea and combinations therein and et al, they are never 1::1.  There's always exceptions.  Just be glad it happened now, prior to thanks giggedy, when there's still 4 some odd month's worth of other scenarios for the atmosphere to anti-correlate new and exciting ways to tune up winter enthusiast's dignities like a chef with a steak hammer...  :lol:

Anyway, failed humor aside ... it helps to have some explanation.  Not to be high handed or anything but ... heh, I honestly walked away from this whole synoptic era pretty early in the game, as I could see this unfolding like 5 days ago.   I've seen this before when the indexes may derive positive or negative field values despite the behavior not being perfectly aligned - it's rare ... but if there is going to be a time of the year where that is more likely to anti-correlate, its at this time of year and sometimes in April

I was never invested because I was balls-deep in the outlook until yesterday. So, yea...better now for that reason, and climo wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

2025 may be the most boring calendar year of our lives....Maybe 1988 or 1990? 1988 had the huge heat in the summer at least...1990 had a nice ice storm in March. This year has had absolute-dick. I think it's the most boring calendar years of our lives.

Completely agree. The only thing I had that was exciting was the 6.5” of rain in like 3 hours on July 10. From an anomaly standpoint that was impressive. But yeah, doesn’t move the weenie like other events. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CoastalWx said:

Completely agree. The only thing I had that was exciting was the 6.5” of rain in like 3 hours on July 10. From an anomaly standpoint that was impressive. But yeah, doesn’t move the weenie like other events. 

I had zilch-zero, ma nature being singy with dinero.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...