Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,184
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    happyclam13
    Newest Member
    happyclam13
    Joined

Tracking the tropics - 2025


tiger_deF
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

1 hour ago, Damage In Tolland said:

This could “possibly” be like that deal we had in I think 2001. We had a strong offshore cane and strong HP to north and it created huge pressure gradient . There were HWW for all of SNE. I remember it distinctly. Was sunny/ cirrus but winds ripped during the day . I may not have year right, but I’ve talked about that event in here before 

But we don’t have a strong HP to the north? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Damage In Tolland said:

We kind of do . May be too far NNE. Maybe nothing close to that scenario happens . Just looking for something that might not be thought of . Hoping for some kind of excitement and expecting Stein and calm 

 Sounds like beer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's see...
The last several Advisories. Not made up and documented.
Adjusted forecast track "nudged" to the W. A WNW movement to continue with an "expected" turn to the N.
ERIN was NEVER forecasted in the earlier advisories to be located at the present position.
Just something to watch, BE AWARE, going forth.
HFSA 2am. Thursday
72.3W 33.85N (closest approach)
Only then a fish let off the hook.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Erin is gone but the follow up wave may be something worth watching. If Erin gets out fast enough we should have the ridge rebuild as a deep trough dives in to our west. And it’s also not a 14 day fantasy deal. 

Obviously we’re never favored, but it’s a different setup at a more “reasonable” range. 
 

 

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said:

Erin is gone but the follow up wave may be something worth watching. If Erin gets out fast enough we should have the ridge rebuild as a deep trough dives in to our west. And it’s also not a 14 day fantasy deal. 

Obviously we’re never favored, but it’s a different setup at a more “reasonable” range. 
 

 

Water will be churned up pretty good though?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, weatherwiz said:

All this hoopla around about tracking more west and south of guidance and blah blah blah and Erin is going to make the north track and re-curve within what was expected several days ago. Physics and science FTW

What a boring place this would be if every post was spot on accurate without questioning.
Respectfully, why have Forum? ERIN wasn't a threat for landfall (given players on the field) but still worthy of the nuisances from formation to dissipation. A CAT5, strongest, fastest intensifying for the location and time of year.      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ROOSTA said:

What a boring place this would be if every post was spot on accurate without questioning.
Respectfully, why have Forum? ERIN wasn't a threat for landfall (given players on the field) but still worthy of the nuisances from formation to dissipation. A CAT5, strongest, fastest intensifying for the location and time of year.      

In terms of Erin and how it intensified, the developing storm, processes, etc. absolutely should be discussed and talked about. What Erin did was special and it’s extremely important these processes continue being studied. 

But this never had a chance of making landfall. When it comes to landfalling tropical systems, particularly in the Northeast, there is a very clear and distinct weather pattern that needs to be in place. We had the exact opposite of that weather pattern. When you don’t have a prime pattern in place, these storms will re-curve.

All these people out there on social media or whatever playing the “but if” game…weather doesn’t work on ifs. There are basic principles and concepts. “If the trough does this…if the high does this…if this if that, the models can change”…that’s not how this science works. Granted, it isn’t an exact science but there are still basic principles and concepts which provide the guidelines and basis. If there were going to be changes to any features or structures the pattern…those signals would exist within modeling or teleconnections and those signals were never, ever present. One run of an OP doesn’t constitute these as being present either. 

If anything, there was a better shot at the storm remaining on a west heading towards Florida, that would have been probable if Erin was within an environment not favorable for strengthening or organization, otherwise Erin was always going to gain latitude.

there was always going to be some range as to exactly how far west Erin would get either prior to re-curving or while re-curving and it was never going to be enough to be a “close call” and that’s because there was never a pattern or feature which would have shunted it even further west. A bunch of people playing the “if game” doesn’t change what the reality was, it doesn’t change what the meteorology and physics dictated would happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, weatherwiz said:

All this hoopla around about tracking more west and south of guidance and blah blah blah and Erin is going to make the north track and re-curve within what was expected several days ago. Physics and science FTW

it's the same thing every year-kind of like radar hallucinations in the winter on an OTS storm...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...