Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,384
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Kabraxis
    Newest Member
    Kabraxis
    Joined

2025-2026 ENSO


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, GaWx said:

Back to 1995-6, lowest SOI plunges -ENSO/lagged NYC wx

-52 on 2/17/17: MB 3/10-18 and 9.7”

-49 on 12/10/12: B 12/26-1/3 and 0.4”

-47 on 12/19/95: MB 1/2-12 and 25”

-47 on 2/2/13: B 2/7-10 and 11.4”


-44 on 12/4/25 (due to strong compact Tahitian low) ??? 


-39 on 12/14/01: 12/30-1/2 MB/0”

-34 on 1/19/17: 2/9-10 B/9.4”

-31 on 11/7/22: 11/14-21 MB/0”

 

 The above tells me that IF there’s possibly any partial correlation of a strong -SOI during -ENSO to cold and/or snow at NYC, it’s not until 1-4 weeks afterward. A period of very heavy snow and/or MB temps occurred 1-4 weeks after 6 of the 7 sub -30 cases. This could easily just be random considering the small sample size and that this is pretty spread out (1-4 weeks afterward).

Several years ago HM did a write up on this. There is a SOI correlation, but it’s during El Niños only. As I’m sure you already know, the STJ is driven by thunderstorms in the tropics and the polar jet is driven by temperature contrasts. Strong -SOI enhances Nino related thunderstorm activity in the tropics and subsequently strengthens the STJ, which is already beefed up by the standing wave El Niño convection on the equator. When there is a big drop in the SOI, the southern stream gets enhanced and the chances for east coast storm activity goes way up afterwards. This does not apply during La Nina’s. Many years ago, JB decided to incorrectly apply and hype big SOI drops to corresponding to STJ/southern stream enhancement, east coast storms and arctic outbreaks during La Nina’s and it was taken to be fact by the weenies and I guess even by some mets…

@donsutherland1 Any stats on this?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Terpeast said:

Trending down, yes, but the thing is AAM forecasts have been biased too negative over the past 30 days. When correcting for that, AAM may be closer to neutral. 

This source shows the strongest tendency decline in months. Makes sense since we are seeing a big reversal from all the +PNA warmth last December which was a mismatch to the La Niña background state.

The more robust La Niña background states can feature strong gradient patterns in December with a cold Canada and Northern Tier. Especially when the pattern matches up so closely with the December MJO 6 composite.

The forcing in the MJO 6 region is driving the U.S. Western ridge and colder Eastern trough pattern which will dominate December 1st through the 16th.

The stronger blocking near Greenland is a result of the other area of the forcing in the Western Hemisphere and the recent +AAM spike in late November. So a bit of a hybrid composite with the split forcing. 

IMG_5267.thumb.png.d7d8c47b3cca8f9da79059b671fb6218.png

IMG_5304.thumb.png.63d36878347137e5041fe80b511d91a9.png

IMG_5305.thumb.png.f19deb46a983ec77b660148ddb167219.png

Split forcing pattern 

IMG_5307.thumb.png.674dd908a06a0faed0dbda5fa55c2986.png

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The EPS and GEFS are indicating that the WPO will spend much of the December 10-20 period at or below -2.000. Regardless of whether the EPO is positive, AO is positive, and PNA is negative, severely negative WPO patterns tend to overwhelm the impact of the other teleconnections. Such patterns typically feature colder than normal conditions in the eastern half of North America and warmer conditions in the western half.

December 15-18, 2013 offers a representative case with the distribution of warm and cold anomalies:

image.gif.c1f2f91639f7e61fff0deaddd9ec67a4.gif

  • Like 5
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Updated Euro seasonal out and it can't get out of its own way insisting on AN temps in the east. Don't buy it as mby has been BN for October and November contrary to the Eps seasonal. Heck, even September was only +.5F, also cooler than forecasted. 

https://charts.ecmwf.int/?facets={"Product type"%3A["Experimental%3A AIFS"]%2C"Parameters"%3A[]%2C"Type"%3A[]%2C"Range"%3A["Seasonal"]}

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, snowman19 said:

Several years ago HM did a write up on this. There is a SOI correlation, but it’s during El Niños only. As I’m sure you already know, the STJ is driven by thunderstorms in the tropics and the polar jet is driven by temperature contrasts. Strong -SOI enhances Nino related thunderstorm activity in the tropics and subsequently strengthens the STJ, which is already beefed up by the standing wave El Niño convection on the equator. When there is a big drop in the SOI, the southern stream gets enhanced and the chances for east coast storm activity goes way up afterwards. This does not apply during La Nina’s. Many years ago, JB decided to incorrectly apply and hype big SOI drops to corresponding to STJ/southern stream enhancement, east coast storms and arctic outbreaks during La Nina’s and it was taken to be fact by the weenies and I guess even by some mets…

@donsutherland1 Any stats on this?

The sample size is too small for meaningful comparisons. However, 10-20 days after the bottom, there wasn't a clear increase in subtropical moisture during La Niña and borderline La Niña/neutral-cool winters. In a few cases, there was an atmospheric river directed at the West Coast.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, donsutherland1 said:

The EPS and GEFS are indicating that the WPO will spend much of the December 10-20 period at or below -2.000. Regardless of whether the EPO is positive, AO is positive, and PNA is negative, severely negative WPO patterns tend to overwhelm the impact of the other teleconnections. Such patterns typically feature colder than normal conditions in the eastern half of North America and warmer conditions in the western half.

December 15-18, 2013 offers a representative case with the distribution of warm and cold anomalies:

image.gif.c1f2f91639f7e61fff0deaddd9ec67a4.gif

Tends to in the other direction, as well...that was one of the issues with my work prior to last year...I really neglected the WPO, which is an egregious error because it's very important.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mitchnick said:

Updated Euro seasonal out and it can't get out of its own way insisting on AN temps in the east. Don't buy it as mby has been BN for October and November contrary to the Eps seasonal. Heck, even September was only +.5F, also cooler than forecasted. 

https://charts.ecmwf.int/?facets={"Product type"%3A["Experimental%3A AIFS"]%2C"Parameters"%3A[]%2C"Type"%3A[]%2C"Range"%3A["Seasonal"]}

It's called regression to mean. Especially in a warming climate, it's hard to string together several below average temperature months in a row. Do not be surprised if there is a torch in January and February. That's been a staple of -ENSO/deep -IOD years in recent times (see 2016-17 and 2022-23).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, PhiEaglesfan712 said:

It's called regression to mean. Especially in a warming climate, it's hard to string together several below average temperature months in a row. Do not be surprised if there is a torch in January and February. That's been a staple of -ENSO/deep -IOD years in recent times (see 2016-17 and 2022-23).

1989/1990 season is a good example.

Record cold December followed be record warm January and February (snowy March).

Today some sites are breaking 1989 records.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, EastonSN+ said:

1989/1990 season is a good example.

Record cold December followed be record warm January and February (snowy March).

Today some sites are breaking 1989 records.

 I don’t feel 1989-90 is an -ENSO analog to 2025-6. That’s because:

-Dec was slightly +ENSO per RONI (+0.09) and only a hair -ENSO per ONI (-0.01).

-Jan was already a solid +ENSO per RONI (+0.39) and slightly +ENSO per ONI (+0.11).

-Feb was +0.31 to +0.34.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PhiEaglesfan712 said:

It's called regression to mean. Especially in a warming climate, it's hard to string together several below average temperature months in a row. Do not be surprised if there is a torch in January and February. That's been a staple of -ENSO/deep -IOD years in recent times (see 2016-17 and 2022-23).

 I still feel that Jan and Feb should be analyzed separately for the NE US. Since 1983-4 as regards -PNA Decs:

-3 times as many -ENSO -PNA Decembers were followed by cold Jans as mild Jans including the recent Jan of 2022. In addition, there were cold Jans in 2014, 2011, 2009, 1985, and 1984. Related to this, 9 of 11 of these Jans were either cold or pretty close to normal.

-But OTOH there were 6 times as many mild Febs vs the only cold Feb (2014) of these analogs in the NE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The pattern in place is becoming deeply entrenched with the widespread deep snow cover across Canada and the tendency for the PV (or at least a piece of it) to want to sit over Hudson Bay. For a variety of reasons I think the general pattern in place now will want to stick around in some form for a while. I know the EPS weeklies have been insistent on shifting things west late in the month but I have my doubts, and even then the cold doesn't really go south it's mostly just in Canada. I certainly wish we could change some aspect of the pattern because otherwise my area stays dry. For me I need some help from the subtropical jet or for the polar jet to pull in a cutoff low when it breaks south. 

In ninas, I climatologically do better in January and February anyway so I guess we will see. 

  • Like 2
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today’s 2 week ensemble MJO forecasts:

-12/5 EPS steady as a rock with a 17+ day long phase 8, second (back to 1974-5) only to the 18 days of 1975-6: a cold E US weenie couldn’t place it any better though keep in mind that the MJO, itself, is only one index of many despite it having notable tendencies:

IMG_5909.png.8e0d26c1df76ec60b2cc42ec9774da62.png
 

12/5 GEFS: though not steady like EPS with only a 5 day phase 8 followed by 3 days of weak phase 1 (which also is often cold in Dec) followed by 5 more days in phase 8 and then 4 days barely in phase 7, this is on the whole still favoring dominating cold in the E US:

IMG_5908.png.11fb873ac78542e4491dfbcd52b9b3db.png
 

 Related to the very cold Dec forecasts, natural gas is up a whopping 6% today, alone! Knowledgeable NG investors don’t normally go long NG in winter unless the forecast is for a cold E US.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, BlizzardWx said:

The pattern in place is becoming deeply entrenched with the widespread deep snow cover across Canada and the tendency for the PV (or at least a piece of it) to want to sit over Hudson Bay. For a variety of reasons I think the general pattern in place now will want to stick around in some form for a while. I know the EPS weeklies have been insistent on shifting things west late in the month but I have my doubts, and even then the cold doesn't really go south it's mostly just in Canada. I certainly wish we could change some aspect of the pattern because otherwise my area stays dry. For me I need some help from the subtropical jet or for the polar jet to pull in a cutoff low when it breaks south. 

In ninas, I climatologically do better in January and February anyway so I guess we will see. 

Some degree of moderation in the East after the 16th fits December climatology since 1991.

But exactly how much of a relaxation remains to be seen.

A 10 to 15 day lag following the current AAM reversal would indicate some degree of moderation by near or after the 20th.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, bluewave said:

Some degree of moderation in the East after the 16th fits December climatology since 1991. But exactly how much of a relaxation remains to be seen. A 10 to 15 day lag following the current AAM reversal would indicate some degree of moderation by near or after the 20th.

 

That is interesting for sure! In my area its the first part of the month that has been warmer with a flat temperature trend for the 2nd half of the month. This may be the coldest first half of December here in some time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, GaWx said:

Today’s 2 week ensemble MJO forecasts:

-12/5 EPS steady as a rock with a 17+ day long phase 8, second (back to 1974-5) only to the 18 days of 1975-6: a cold E US weenie couldn’t place it any better though keep in mind that the MJO, itself, is only one index of many despite it having notable tendencies:

IMG_5909.png.8e0d26c1df76ec60b2cc42ec9774da62.png
 

12/5 GEFS: not steady like EPS with only a 5 day phase 8 followed by 3 days of weak phase 1 (which also is often cold in Dec) followed by 5 more days in phase 8 and then 4 days barely in phase 7:

IMG_5908.png.11fb873ac78542e4491dfbcd52b9b3db.png

Really makes you wonder if the extended range guidance is going to be doing some hard corrections in the next week or two. Clearly at least somewhat at odds with what the MJO would say for that time of year. 

ecmwf-ensemble-avg-namer-z500_anom-6188800.png

figreg200350_8.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BlizzardWx said:

Really makes you wonder if the extended range guidance is going to be doing some hard corrections in the next week or two. Clearly at least somewhat at odds with what the MJO would say for that time of year. 

ecmwf-ensemble-avg-namer-z500_anom-6188800.png

figreg200350_8.png

Agreed. But also keep in mind that the 15 days on that model (0Z EPS) preceding the map you showed are very cold in the NE 1/4 of the US and suggest one of the coldest 1st 19 days of Dec anomalies on record in the NE 1/4 of the US:

Days 1-10:

IMG_5916.thumb.png.80d17abdc9455038c2a3e39797419bfb.png


Days 11-15:

IMG_5917.thumb.png.c1bb17d939e7e5c5d3d815482be68479.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GaWx said:

Agreed. But also keep in mind that the 15 days on that model (0Z EPS) preceding the map you showed are very cold and suggest one of the coldest 1st 19 days of Dec anomalies on record in the NE 1/4 of the US:

Days 1-10:

IMG_5916.thumb.png.80d17abdc9455038c2a3e39797419bfb.png


Days 11-15:

IMG_5917.thumb.png.c1bb17d939e7e5c5d3d815482be68479.png

I can't disagree with you there. But if we could push the trough west a bit and allow for just a hint of offshore ridging (off the east coast) like the MJO map shows, it would slow the storm track down and give a better chance of snow for many. So impressively cold for some yes, but we have got to get some moisture with an improved storm track or it hardly matters. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Four of the first five days of December have seen the PNA come in with daily values < 0. The baseline idea of a predominantly negative PNA for December appears on course, especially if the latest guidance winds up being reasonably accurate.

Latest GEFS PNA forecast:

image.png.3ca8300b7240f0ce1f8f38c6935d6784.png

However, the WPO is forecast to be strongly negative. As a result, the WPO should overwhelm the PNA- and allow generally colder than normal conditions to persist in much of the eastern half of North America during the December 10-20 period. Some milder days are plausible, but the period will likely feature below normal temperatures overall. The Southeast has the highest probability of seeing a break in the cold due to the PNA- connection to SE ridging.

The most recent ECMWF weekly forecasts:

December 8-15:

webp-worker-commands-6797587544-mzmdr-6fe5cac1a363ec1525f54343b6cc9fd8-uyecjnno.thumb.webp.6dc0ab778f51b4bb76d225056ba49a84.webp

December 15-22:

webp-worker-commands-6797587544-f879w-6fe5cac1a363ec1525f54343b6cc9fd8-isgsyybt.thumb.webp.d91d1c9ae22106d41ec455c9f23be5ff.webp

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, donsutherland1 said:

Four of the first five days of December have seen the PNA come in with daily values < 0. The baseline idea of a predominantly negative PNA for December appears on course, especially if the latest guidance winds up being reasonably accurate.

Latest GEFS PNA forecast:

image.png.3ca8300b7240f0ce1f8f38c6935d6784.png

However, the WPO is forecast to be strongly negative. As a result, the WPO should overwhelm the PNA- and allow generally colder than normal conditions to persist in much of the eastern half of North America during the December 10-20 period. Some milder days are plausible, but the period will likely feature below normal temperatures overall. The Southeast has the highest probability of seeing a break in the cold due to the PNA- connection to SE ridging.

The most recent ECMWF weekly forecasts:

December 8-15:

webp-worker-commands-6797587544-mzmdr-6fe5cac1a363ec1525f54343b6cc9fd8-uyecjnno.thumb.webp.6dc0ab778f51b4bb76d225056ba49a84.webp

December 15-22:

webp-worker-commands-6797587544-f879w-6fe5cac1a363ec1525f54343b6cc9fd8-isgsyybt.thumb.webp.d91d1c9ae22106d41ec455c9f23be5ff.webp

I’ll be rooting for a strong -PNA this month. Why?

For -ENSO: Strongest -PNA Decs since 1983-4: 

-2021-2: -2.56; Jan was +1.01/cold

-2010-11: -1.78; Jan was +1.29/cold

-1984-5: -1.60; Jan was +1.63/cold

-2008-9: -1.41; Jan was +0.61/cold

 ———

The Euro Weeklies continue with a pretty strong SER/-PNA in the first half of Jan. But it’s recently been correcting to a weaker one in late Nov/early Dec.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, PhiEaglesfan712 said:

1984-85 and 2021-22 aren't good analogs because they had torch Decembers. In fact, both winters only had one really cold and snowy month (January). I'd go as far to say that 84-85 is the colder climate version of 21-22.

 9 of the last 11 of the Jans following -PNAs in Dec for -ENSO were either cold or pretty close to normal. You’ve been harping on the only two warm Jans of the 11. Feb will more than likely be mild. It’s not necessarily Jan and Feb being similar as you’ve been thinking. This indicator suggests that’s unlikely as if now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mitchnick said:

That post was based on the 12z runs. There have been 4 runs since and the AI has come up with 4 different forecasts. Apparently, it needs my time to learn.

I'm still waiting on the 4" of snow it had here only 36 hours before the rainstorm a few days ago.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...