Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,282
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    happyclam13
    Newest Member
    happyclam13
    Joined

2025-2026 ENSO


Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, michsnowfreak said:

Yeah that makes sense. Not terribly different from my avg temps. But yet another example of how snowfall is localized and very subject to other things than just the avg temp.

I wonder what a REASONABLE line or latitude is to draw a line and assume below that line is where you really need seasonable to colder than avg temps to get snow.

Based on a quick calculation, I get your DJF avg high/low as 38/20. Mine is 34/21.

Probably about 41 N. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, michsnowfreak said:

Interesting! Our lows are a bit more elevated due to lots of overcast nights, though we still drop below zero several days annually. 

Our lows are pretty cold because I’m in a deep, high valley (3800 feet, surrounded by 5500-6000 foot high mountains). On upslope snow days our temps get very cold also.

The flora on my property is pretty similar I’d imagine to your area. A lot of Beech, Yellow Birch, Sugar Maple and Basswood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, snowman19 said:

This drought situation is actually worse than last year at this time. We have been completely devoid of widespread heavy rains in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic since late July. October looks dry as far as the eye can see
 

* Ahem* don't mind the record rainfall that Albany and southern NY received the day after this data in this map was valid 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This article is pretty consistent with my thinking on how to model winter precipitation patterns in the US. It's strongly supportive of a wetter winter nationally than last year, despite what the models show.

https://opensnow.com/news/post/how-atlantic-ocean-temps-could-impact-la-nina-2024-2025-winter-forecast

Recent seasons on the Canadian have been depicted in an MJO pattern of 4-5 for winter. The models are showing 6-7 for this winter. That's very different from recent winters, look at the depicted east African precip pattern at the equator. Look at Brazil shown wet v dry in phase five. It's not 5 like in recent years. It looks like 6-7 to me, not perfect but better than the others. We had 4-5-6 for precip nationally last winter, but made drier by the Atlantic features.

Again - this match holds up for a lot of my methods, although it isn't quite what I expect. But it did have 106 ACE as an example which still feels about right.

Screenshot-2025-10-01-10-24-11-PM.pngScreenshot-2025-10-01-10-12-53-PM.png

Screenshot-2025-10-01-10-09-33-PM.png

Screenshot-2025-10-01-10-13-43-PM.png

Screenshot-2025-10-01-10-15-16-PM.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, raindancewx said:

This article is pretty consistent with my thinking on how to model winter precipitation patterns in the US. It's strongly supportive of a wetter winter nationally than last year, despite what the models show.

https://opensnow.com/news/post/how-atlantic-ocean-temps-could-impact-la-nina-2024-2025-winter-forecast

Recent seasons on the Canadian have been depicted in an MJO pattern of 4-5 for winter. The models are showing 6-7 for this winter. That's very different from recent winters, look at the depicted east African precip pattern at the equator. Look at Brazil shown wet v dry in phase five. It's not 5 like in recent years. It looks like 6-7 to me, not perfect but better than the others. We had 4-5-6 for precip nationally last winter, but made drier by the Atlantic features.

Again - this match holds up for a lot of my methods, although it isn't quite what I expect. But it did have 106 ACE as an example which still feels about right.

Screenshot-2025-10-01-10-24-11-PM.pngScreenshot-2025-10-01-10-12-53-PM.png

Screenshot-2025-10-01-10-09-33-PM.png

Screenshot-2025-10-01-10-13-43-PM.png

Screenshot-2025-10-01-10-15-16-PM.png

It also looks like some phase 5 forcing on the CANSIPS anomaly maps. But yea, 5-6-7 look dominant verbatim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Same page as raindance....when I see phase 7 December composite all I can think of is Dec 2007, although that month didn't spend much time in that phase in a literal sense.

image.png.0be60a6ef3fd9e01bcb0e35a0da746ff.pngimage.png.4f0d7a38c9ff8087944bf2a3c18c38bb.png

07-08 was a shit show south of New England

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, snowman19 said:

07-08 was a shit show south of New England

I'm as shocked that you chose to point that out as I'm sure everyone else is...

I do foresee a gradient aspect to this season... maybe it's a bit further north than that year owed to CC....just gonna have to see. I think it's a pretty decent west Pacific analog in that it was more neutral than the majority of the past decade, albeit not outright negative like 2021-2022. I think the mid atlantic will have a better shot later in the season than earlier....just my early thoughts.

I don't see this season as a KU cookbook, though we will have a window or two. With cold in SE Canada and systems trying to cut west/moisture trying to overrun antecedent cold, you will probably want latitude.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, snowman19 said:

07-08 was a shit show south of New England

That is one that didn't really follow the early season la nina rule. We got the snowstorm on Dec 5, which would have normally meant a great snow year, but the season fell apart instead.

The rest of the winter had very little snow, aside from the Feb 22 event, with January-April slightly above average temperature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, snowman19 said:

This cooling actually started before 15 days ago. Now we watch, either the warm blob comes back by December (2013), or Paul Roundy’s opinion that a classic cold horseshoe develops by winter comes to fruition 

oisst_ssta_change15_15dayrm_nepac.png

that's going to flip back over the next couple of weeks with the anomalous ridge developing there

eps_z500aMean_npac_7.thumb.png.ce99eeb1f246dcc7cad7297d02d7cb55.png

  • Like 3
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Same page as raindance....when I see phase 7 December composite all I can think of is Dec 2007, although that month didn't spend much time in that phase in a literal sense.

image.png.0be60a6ef3fd9e01bcb0e35a0da746ff.pngimage.png.4f0d7a38c9ff8087944bf2a3c18c38bb.png

That was when one of the worst ice storms for northeast OK occurred. Please no :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, brooklynwx99 said:

that's going to flip back over the next couple of weeks with the anomalous ridge developing there

eps_z500aMean_npac_7.thumb.png.ce99eeb1f246dcc7cad7297d02d7cb55.png

EPS weeklies try to bring the GOA trough back by the 20th of this month. But on the other hand they didn't see this GOA ridge until a few days ago. But considering this GOA ridge will probably be a dominant feature this winter I am not surprised to see it poking back up. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/1/2025 at 9:38 AM, anthonymm said:

Probably about 41 N. 

2015-16 was an above to much above average temp winter here and snow wise was above normal. You have to remember as you go south you need less snow overall to get to normal and one epic pattern or good luck can get you there. I don’t take much stock in temp maps that show above normal and think that means it’ll automatically mean it’s another bad snow winter. If I see another setup for more stretches of a horrendously bad Pacific that means much more to me.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BlizzardWx said:

EPS weeklies try to bring the GOA trough back by the 20th of this month. But on the other hand they didn't see this GOA ridge until a few days ago. But considering this GOA ridge will probably be a dominant feature this winter I am not surprised to see it poking back up. 

yeah, not the best job

ezgif-889318495691b0.thumb.gif.665c8324707f57c4970f22f9ccc68cc5.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...