Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,509
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

It was a Flop... February 2024 Disco. Thread


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

I'm looking at a modeled tapestry that fits the late Feb thru mid April leitmotif that goes back many winter season end-of-life scenarios

Significant, if not major warm up, during the first week of March is gathering some presentation in both the modeled dailies, but also is backed by telecon spread/projections. 

As that breaks down ... the tropospheric bulk warmth that was generated by larger scaled feed-backs and increasing solar contribution et al, progresses out of the eastern continent and is delivered to higher latitudes. As it arrives up there ... it may superimpose over a background tendency for blocking to emerge 

( ...no, I do not believe any said blocking is related to SSWs.  Different discussion).

This is where the outlook gets really dicey for warm enthusiasts around mid March.  This could mean all kind of different possible things to the daily weather charts - there's no way to cogently speculate for now.  Whatever comes of that, the light wind balmed out ridge utopia like the Canadian GGEM ... I would not guess that look remains the same after 7th ... 10th.   In basic principle, unless 2012 is showing up ...it would be unlikely that persists, that early in the spring, anyway. 

I would suggest overall that the spring is above normal and that any possible mid March regression doesn't characterize total.

 

Just looking at EPS...if anything were to change to cold and stormier it would be probably at least mid March. That's still a torch look on 3/8. So yay, I'll prepare for my March 2010 9" rain event again.  :lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Of course for the last two weeks when the airmass is serviceable, :stein:shows up. So much for the good back half of winter. 

Can’t win the last couple years…always something.  
 

But The last couple weeks have been consistently cold, and being we had the bigger event 9 days ago…it’s been a wintry vibe with solid cover for close to 10 days now.  Which for here, is better than last winter. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

Can’t win the last couple years…always something.  
 

But The last couple weeks have been consistently cold, and being we had the bigger event 9 days ago…it’s been a wintry vibe with solid cover for close to 10 days now.  Which for here, is better than last winter. 

So instead of F- it is F+
 

just joshing.  It has not been a good season for almost everyone in here. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Of course for the last two weeks when the airmass is serviceable, :stein:shows up. So much for the good back half of winter. 

Kev's concerns were valid....I suspected the drier interval would be more confiened to the first half of the month. Butttt....nope. NSI index remains positive.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

Can’t win the last couple years…always something.  
 

But The last couple weeks have been consistently cold, and being we had the bigger event 9 days ago…it’s been a wintry vibe with solid cover for close to 10 days now.  Which for here, is better than last winter. 

Yeah you to the Cape (of all places) and two ski areas in VT lucked out. But for 85% of the region, blows. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

The raging hard on Pac jet, the North Pacific and the dry Euro monthly screwed the winter 

Exactly correct.

1972-1973 to a tee....except with some blocking, which made no difference. I thought the blocking would yield a better result relative to that year and with some luck, it would have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Of course for the last two weeks when the airmass is serviceable, :stein:shows up. So much for the good back half of winter. 

Last 9 days have averaged 28/7 with maxima ranging from 21 to 32.  We took advantage of the seasonal temps with a qpf total of 0.07".  :fulltilt:

Feb precip is currently 0.44", with 80% of that in the strongest Feb TS I can recall.  Current lowest Feb precip is 1.04", so a new low is a given.  If we stay below the 0.57" of Jan 2004, only the 0.31" of April 1999 will be drier than this month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Snowcrazed71 said:

I joke about the March Mid Month revenge ( but you never know ).

I took am ready to turn things around and bring in the Springtime warmth. I'm ready!

No, its true....everyone always recalls 1997...it was a dead-ratter that ended with a bang out of absolute nowhere.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

No, its true....everyone always recalls 1997...it was a dead-ratter that ended with a bang out of absolute nowhere.

I was just thinking about that. Right at nightfall it started to blow and drift around. Talk about WTF.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CoastalWx said:

Just looking at EPS...if anything were to change to cold and stormier it would be probably at least mid March. That's still a torch look on 3/8. So yay, I'll prepare for my March 2010 9" rain event again.  :lol: 

Don't get me started on the "flood wick" that began setting last June ...

'Magine if a Mother's Day 2005 came back over a broader region than just Merrimack headwaters now? 

- changing the subject a little going down the flood talk but ( sorry ) I have a flood fetish in my dystopian dream book for tree tops and tele' poles sticking out of water with people sitting on roof-tops.  LOL.  No but I do find them fascinating. 

I've often thought ... our geology's overriding topography is very old and determined. It seems the run-out channels are so deeply established that once we get to a certain flood amount, it really can't get higher because the adjoining flood plains are fixed.  The elevations rise out side of those, too much.  The flood mass would have to be factors of 3 or 4, which then requires a 1,000 year return rate or something.   Anyway, we don't "bible flood" that often.  Humanity's taken to building towns and neighborhood amid the 1::200 year event zones, simply because that's just long enough to have verdant pastoral/usable/attractive land for a multitude reasons.   But every 1000 years ...?

About 7 or 8 years ago ... there was hired geologists doing well taps on my street and around this side of town. We set over the water shed off the old Military base, Fort Devens, which had a landfill that dump Military grade chemistry for decades in the middle part of last century.  In this case, Arsenic 6 was suspected in the ground going down deep. SO, they were hired to sample to determine the extent of the issue before Ayer becomes the next Flint, MI.   Turns out ... the town water itself ( which I am connected to thank goodness) is unaffected but any dude with a well around here is probably either down to 1 testicle or has grown a 3rd by now...

While they were on my street ... I ambled out there with a cup of joe and struck up a conversation. The woman said, "You know ...the extracted material we are plumbing up in these tap wells all over this side of town is consistent with alluvial plainer material, going down some 90 feet."  Her eye brow was raised over a subtle squint like she was working something out...  Of course that drove me to ask further.  "...Yeah that means this region spends a significant amount of it geological history under water.  Probably, I don't know, once every 500 years?" 

SO Ayer sets in the heart of the Nashoba Valley.  In fact, the river of the same name cuts through the township.  This whole region is originally just one such verdant attraction -

There's probably a lot of these types of lost regions that are in long wait of an extraordinary headline. Not just here in the Nashoba Valley.  Concord has a river that is similar.  So does Sudbury ..etc etc...

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CoastalWx said:

Just looking at EPS...if anything were to change to cold and stormier it would be probably at least mid March. That's still a torch look on 3/8. So yay, I'll prepare for my March 2010 9" rain event again.  :lol: 

Yeah, I don't mean to "predict" a regression ... I mean, that reminds of those years where the blocking reared after early warmth blue-balled the warm enthusiasts when an early unfinished BJ balmed 'em all up and then left ...

It's more about being leery of that potential.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Yeah, I don't mean to "predict" a regression ... I mean, that reminds of those years where the blocking reared after early warmth blue-balled the warm enthusiasts after an early unfinished BJ balmed 'em all up and then left ...

It's more about being leery of that potential.

:lol: 

 

I'm aware of that too. Some signs second half stormier for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

Could have potential for a line of thunderstorms to move through next Thursday. Instability won't be anything noteworthy but that's some intense dynamics with a large warm sector characterized by dewpoints >50 with steep lapse rates. I am sniffing some strong convection potential. 

Sniff this :weenie:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
  • Weenie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

Could have potential for a line of thunderstorms to move through next Thursday. Instability won't be anything noteworthy but that's some intense dynamics with a large warm sector characterized by dewpoints >50 with steep lapse rates. I am sniffing some strong convection potential. 

Big winds signaled 

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...