Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,507
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    SnowHabit
    Newest Member
    SnowHabit
    Joined

Countdown to Winter 2017-2018 Thread


eyewall

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

This winter is being preceded by an enso neutral summer and fall months during hurricane season which preceded the winter of 2005-2006 and snowfall was hard to come by here on Cape Cod, MA but we did receive a microburst event.  The waters off the coast will be extremely high above normal as until a major storm wipes out those temperatures, we could see an explosive nor'easter season

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, USCAPEWEATHERAF said:

This winter is being preceded by an enso neutral summer and fall months during hurricane season which preceded the winter of 2005-2006 and snowfall was hard to come by here on Cape Cod, MA but we did receive a microburst event.  The waters off the coast will be extremely high above normal as until a major storm wipes out those temperatures, we could see an explosive nor'easter season

I guess its possible that  the gulf stream may play a role...we'll have to watch that...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, USCAPEWEATHERAF said:

This winter is being preceded by an enso neutral summer and fall months during hurricane season which preceded the winter of 2005-2006 and snowfall was hard to come by here on Cape Cod, MA but we did receive a microburst event.  The waters off the coast will be extremely high above normal as until a major storm wipes out those temperatures, we could see an explosive nor'easter season

Are you referring to the tropospheric fold event of December 2005 ? 
 

If so that wasn't a "microburst", per se.  

It was just that... a trop. fold, which has to do with entirely different mechanics and is spread out over much large scale than microbursting.  I'll leave it at that as the information is readily available for free on countless web-sources within just a couple few clicks of a mouse, and or swipes of filthy, bacteria ridden portable "douche"vices  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd love to take in a lunch with the modelers of those products and engage in some candid exchanges as to what physical parameterizations ... along with any assumptions vs sciences ... etc, etc, that "art" the product(s) into existence. 

What you folks describes there sounds strikingly similar to just taking persistence and moving it forward into a steeper hemispheric gradient of winter.   Quasi favorable Pacific combined with geophysical-natural tendency to bulge heights in the west because of continental terrain forcing, with subsequent negative node near the OV/S-SE Canada ...mmm sound familiar?  It butt-banged warm weather enthusiasts out of goodly amount of this summer, too.  

Who knows -

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, sebastiaan1973 said:

in the past I wrote about http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/climate/seasonInsert existing attachmental-to-decadal/gpc-outlooks/ens-mean but there was no reaction. So perhaps nobody is interested. Time will tell ;) 

2cat_20170801_z500_months46_global_deter_public.png

I've never seen that model before...but that would be a pretty brutal pattern for winter lovers in the northeast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it just me (probably so...)  or does anyone else privately hate "wink" emoji's ? 

I find them to be wanting ... also, patronizingly superior much of the time. 

I don't believe they were originally designed for how they are used the majority of times.  If one is in a chat-group and they say something patently absurd to gain a giggle or two, okay. Throw a wink at the end ... Or, one is flirting with a girl of their GF ...BF if they lean that way. Fine.  The object of that course gets a wink.  

Instead, the use of them is bathed in some sort of connotation as though to think the rest of us must be missing the boat one what the winker actually knows -

   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/12/2017 at 2:31 PM, ORH_wxman said:

One piece of info from 1717 does make me pretty sure they had some amazing depths...the Puritans weren't going to church on Sundays for 2 weeks during that. You know it was bad if the Puritans said "ah screw it" for church.

Will, that was close to the Little Ice Age so they must've had some amazing winters back then.  Even in the 1800s I found a couple of winters referenced in the Pennsylvania Weather Book where New York City and Philadelphia both recorded 100" of snow.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, uncle W said:

the ole Farmers almanac had its hits and misses over the years...the 1966-67 edition said it would be an old fashion winter...it was right on...the 1995-96 edition had it mild with less snow than average but did have above normal precipitation along the coast...

The old farmers almanac looks like it went furnace, with a warm and wet look. I will post the maps later. Last winter it went mild for most of the country and snowy in the interior Northeast. I've been checking the OFA forecasts since the early 2000s and have found they are much more accurate than the FA. Lets hope the FA is correct. I think the FA went cold last year too. Of course you don't see the OFA in the news headlines because it's a benign look.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/12/2017 at 2:43 PM, ORH_wxman said:

The Pequot War might be more suited for hurricane of 1635 discussion. Water up to thy knickers prevented good use of the yoke fortnight.

Will I read the pdf about that storm, and it seems like it could have been a borderline Cat 4?  I wonder what the water temps were like to sustain a beast like that?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Paragon said:

Will I read the pdf about that storm, and it seems like it could have been a borderline Cat 4?  I wonder what the water temps were like to sustain a beast like that?!

It was probably moving really fast similar to 1938...though perhaps the gulf stream was a bit amped up that year and warmer than average...it can have a bit of variance from year to year which could help or hurt TCs.

 

6 minutes ago, Paragon said:

Will, that was close to the Little Ice Age so they must've had some amazing winters back then.  Even in the 1800s I found a couple of winters referenced in the Pennsylvania Weather Book where New York City and Philadelphia both recorded 100" of snow.

 

Yeah it wouldn't surprise me. I wish we had some better records from the LIA winters. What we do know though is that they did tend to be drier than what we saw in the 20th and 21st centuries....but also colder. There were some epic frigid nor' easters...like Jan 1857.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

It was probably moving really fast similar to 1938...though perhaps the gulf stream was a bit amped up that year and warmer than average...it can have a bit of variance from year to year which could help or hurt TCs.

 

Yeah it wouldn't surprise me. I wish we had some better records from the LIA winters. What we do know though is that they did tend to be drier than what we saw in the 20th and 21st centuries....but also colder. There were some epic frigid nor' easters...like Jan 1857.

That was the two to three footer I read about with temps near 0! I wonder how that happened?

Speaking about really snowy winters, looking at the "unofficial records" there was a winter like 2 years before Central Park began keeping snowfall records that supposedly had 90" of snow.  That was the last blockbuster winter of the 1800s.  Pity that it didn't happen two years later.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...