Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Toothache
    Newest Member
    Toothache
    Joined

Feb 13-15 modeled event increased confidence now.


Typhoon Tip

Recommended Posts

I wanted to start a more centrically devoted thread for the event next week, as it is now inside of D7 (day six), which means it opens up within the tentative probability scope in my mind.  

 

Additionally,  I see some teleconnector support suddenly emerging, which enters an interesting historical note: sometimes the operational runs do lead the ensemble clusters, when/where the latter means tend to inevitably fall in line with the more sophisticated operational versions, when they (more than less) agree. Here, we had vague tele' support up through last night, but then this occurred ...

 

post-904-0-14350600-1391800235_thumb.jpg

 

That represents a full +1 standard deviation rise in the largest domain space index on the planet, and to move that much mass usually requires some kind of correlated expression on the weather charts actually be realized.  Namely, however transient, a western upward surge in heights, as a response; which subsequent mass conservation and typical R-wave responses assert a lowering in the heights over eastern North America.   

 

Perhaps less convincing is the Climate Diagnostic Center's derivative(s) (above being the Climate Prediction Center); however, there are some interesting details...

 

post-904-0-58812400-1391800560_thumb.jpg

 

On PNA on the left is in fact rising during the 10th through the 20th of the month.  Meanwhile, notice that really interesting dinky dunk in the NAO, before rebounding back to the preferred seasonal bias of modestly positive?  That is enough there to suggest that a period of "somewhat" suppressed (latitudinally) flow should take place in the MA; however transient aside, the timing there is superb, and in concert with a rising PNA. Together they do place a negative teleconnector convergent signal near the Del Marva bull's eye. 

 

Moreover, it should be noted that the CDC calculates its teleconnectors based upon low level wind flux anomalies.  Whereas, the CPC calculates the tele's based upon mid level height anomalies.  I have often wondered if there is more relevancy to using one vs the other, whether it is winter or summer.  I think (intuitively) the instruction of the mid level jets on determining the overall pattern being what it is, would suggest the CPC is the more relevant tool at this time of year; but I am less than certain of that. 

 

The operational Euro currently lifts a Miller A up into rotted polar air, but cold enough to produce a prolific event.  PWAT transport would be significant given the southerly origin of the deep layer wave. As an on-going homage to the rise in PNA, that may not be the last possibility through the period (I abstained from referring to it as a "threat" just yet.  A day and half from now, we can change the titles around...).  Most guidance types flag the 18th - 21st as additional time(s) of interest.  GFS is flat, but has a progressive bias in it's middle range, so that "could" argue it comes back west in time.  The GGEM has a monster blue bomb, but just off shore.  The following statement may seem dubiously rooted in logic, but I kind of like the idea that there is less agreement for a D6 system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

This will take some work getting a hit. However, the EC continues to show about the only way possible to get one..lol.

 

 

Did you see the 00z UKMET?    Pretty much a blizzard for eastern zones.., if cold enough.  But tight bit of a nuke there...

 

Also, the signal is still there as far as the tele's, though we've seen more elaborate and confident examples of this in the past, as was outlined.  But ... we may be in for a burst of light to lower end moderate snow for a few later Sunday, after that system was entirely dropped, ...underscoring that volatility and chaos are both at a surplus going ahead, so deterministism is at a permium

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know... I think it's on the table based at what I am looking at.  The 00z oper. GFS was impressive with amplitude nearing the lower M/A (mid levels) and now the 12z has a negatively tilting and powerful vmax more central M/A located, ... Meanwhile, rising PNA with a subtle dip in the NAO is still flagged... 

 

Got to think outside the box and work in a running correction to what is depicted -- it's all a virtual game in the art of deterministic weather forecasting -- and it very much is as much a creative process as it is an analytical one.   

 

That (below) is impressive enough for me...

gfs_namer_144_500_vort_ht.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think part of the issue too is the temp profile. The atmosphere preceding this is being flooded with warmer air aloft from the midwest. So with that, I think it becomes another issue to deal with. In other words...it's not necessarily a question of the storm as being unlikely...it's the ptype that may be an issue if the GFS is correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think part of the issue too is the temp profile. The atmosphere preceding this is being flooded with warmer air aloft from the midwest. So with that, I think it becomes another issue to deal with. In other words...it's not necessarily a question of the storm as being unlikely...it's the ptype that may be an issue if the GFS is correct.

 

Well yeah ... I think most read these with the going assumption that we are talking about snow, but ... I wasn't.  It's getting an event at all to verify first.   

 

This could very well be .5 to 1.0" of water... too.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As for p-type ... a lot of times in these spring-like patterns, what appears to be slightly too warm in a middle range period, ends up more isothermic, 0C when the time comes.  The thing is, the needle thread option in most guidance I have seen is E of the region, so that introduce cooler correction plausibility whether it is outright illustrated on a given model or not. 

 

We'll just have to let it ride for awhile and see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EC's looking pretty good track-wise for Thursday.

Looks decent for h120, but still not invested. Could easily slide OTS with this progressive flow. 

 

So many moving parts at h5, that I'm not really investing much time into this for another day or two.

 

On the other hand, I invested a week into the SWFE last week...shows how much confidence I don't have in this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kind of a march like look on the euro for the system. I think if it comes down hard enough we could get decent snow to the coast with the cold ocean provided the mid and upper level warmth is limited.

 

Yeah I think so too, especially with an almost due north low intensifying east of Cape Cod. I still have some doubts with this, but not a bad looking system now that it's more independent of anything in the Midwest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks decent for h120, but still not invested. Could easily slide OTS with this progressive flow. 

 

So many moving parts at h5, that I'm not really investing much time into this for another day or two.

 

On the other hand, I invested a week into the SWFE last week...shows how much confidence I don't have in this one.

 

I'm taking comfort that you have the GFS showing the big rainer and the EC riding up along the coast.  Like you said, lots of moving parts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thing is, this system will be toting a bit of an anomalous PWAT rich air mass due to its origin...Euro keeps 850 0C isotherm S through the event.  

 

I think confidence on this event just gained another 10% or so ...over 50/50 now for a system, less somewhat on p-type, but plenty of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...