Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,509
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

1/28-2/1: Multiple winter storm threats per models


GaWx

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Robert on FB:

 

This may not be sampled properly in the data. I don't think any model had much of it in the 12z runs just looking at the initialized 5H panels. Notice the systems west of Baja, California. This is what the NAM is taking east and trying to pick it up with the wave diving into the Rockies Tuesday. Models notoriously mishandle those systems way out west until we get closer in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys the Euro is doing what the Euro always does. It almost never has run after run of the same thing. It ALMOST ALWAYS has one or two runs that lose the storm only to bring it back. After seeing the NAM and GFS this poster is not worried. Now if come Monday all models lose it then yes it's gone but for now this is just business as usual.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By my count.. 11 of the 21 SREF member’s are major hits for the interior Southeast.

 

Here’s a night Recap: 

 

These models show major hits for a large portion of the southeast: GGEM,NAVGEM,NAM,SREF’s, JMA.

 

These models show very little for anyone:  OP EURO, OP GFS, UKMET.

 

These models are in between(good for the coastal plain):  GFS ens, euro ens.

 

 

I would say the outcome is anybody’s guess right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By my count.. 11 of the 21 SREF member’s are major hits for the interior Southeast.

Here’s a night Recap:

These models show major hits for a large portion of the southeast: GGEM,NAVGEM,NAM,SREF’s, JMA.

These models show very little for anyone: OP EURO, OP GFS, UKMET.

These models are in between(good for the coastal plain): GFS ens, euro ens.

I would say the outcome is anybody’s guess right now.

I tend to favor a Carolina coastal special but not by much. All options are realistic at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By my count.. 11 of the 21 SREF member’s are major hits for the interior Southeast.

Here’s a night Recap:

These models show major hits for a large portion of the southeast: GGEM,NAVGEM,NAM,SREF’s, JMA.

These models show very little for anyone: OP EURO, OP GFS, UKMET.

These models are in between(good for the coastal plain): GFS ens, euro ens.

I would say the outcome is anybody’s guess right now.

Allan Huffman Just tweeted the samething for the most part on his page.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From GSP forecast discussion:

 

THE OP MODELS HAVE COME INTO BETTER AGREEMENT WITH THE INCOMING S/W
AND POSSIBLE COASTAL LOW SCENARIO TUE NIGHT THROUGH WED. THE 00Z CMC
CONTINUES TO PRODUCE AN OUTLYING SOLN. THE MODEL IS MUCH SLOWER THAN
THE OTHER OP MODELS DUE TO THE INGESTION OF A PACIFIC LOW. THIS
GIVES THE MODEL MORE SRN ENERGY AND AN UNREALISTIC LOOKING
STRETCHED/OUT H5 TROF AXIS...THUS NOT ALLOWING THE SFC HIGH TO BUILD
INTO THE AREA AS STRONGLY. THIS ENABLES PERSISTENT ULVL DIV TO
PRODUCE A WEAK COASTAL LOW AND COPIOUS AMOUNTS OF QPF ALONG THE
COAST WITH MEASURABLE PRECIP OVERRIDING THE ENTIRE FCST AREA. THESE
IDEAS HAVE BEEN GIVEN LITTLE TO NO WEIGHT AND INSTEAD WILL GO WITH
THE GOOD AGREEMENT BTW THE GFS/ECMWF...BOTH OF WHICH BRING IN A MORE
RELAXED S/W AND NOT MUCH IF ANY SFC REFLECTION LOW DEVELOPMENT. THIS
IDEA MAKES SENSE DUE TO THE OVERALL BROADNESS OF THE PARENT TROF
WHICH KEEPS IT/S ERN PERIPHERY WELL OFFSHORE. THUS...PRECIP THROUGH
WED WILL LIKELY BE FOCUSED ALONG THE COAST ALIGNED IN A REGION OF
OFFSHORE WEAKNESS. ALL OF THIS TO SAY...THE CWFA FCST IS NOW DRY
THROUGH THU WHICH FOLLOWS THE PREVIOUS DECREASING POP TRENDS AND
THINKING.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys the Euro is doing what the Euro always does. It almost never has run after run of the same thing. It ALMOST ALWAYS has one or two runs that lose the storm only to bring it back. After seeing the NAM and GFS this poster is not worried. Now if come Monday all models lose it then yes it's gone but for now this is just business as usual.

I agree 100%, it was either yesterday morning or Thursday night I posted that the Euro would probably lose the storm all together yesterday and then bring it back by tomorrow. It is a typical trend it does. The gfs has been crap IMO all winter, the NAM has been able to sniff a few storms out before the big models , ala the snow in LA/Texas yesterday. Not saying I think the NAM is right but I don't completely discredit it. So I'm not worried yet,need to wait until 0z models Sunday night before I jump

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree 100%, it was either yesterday morning or Thursday night I posted that the Euro would probably lose the storm all together yesterday and then bring it back by tomorrow. It is a typical trend it does. The gfs has been crap IMO all winter, the NAM has been able to sniff a few storms out before the big models , ala the snow in LA/Texas yesterday. Not saying I think the NAM is right but I don't completely discredit it. So I'm not worried yet,need to wait until 0z models Sunday night before I jump

For now you can write off those models as possibly just losing the storm. Now if 24-36 hours from now we still don't have it then it is time to worry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From GSP forecast discussion:

 

=http://forecast.weather.gov/glossary.php?word=ECMWF]ECMWF[/url]...BOTH OF WHICH BRING IN A MORE

RELAXED S/W AND NOT MUCH IF ANY SFC REFLECTION LOW DEVELOPMENT. THIS

IDEA MAKES SENSE DUE TO THE OVERALL BROADNESS OF THE PARENT [url=http://forecast.weather.gov/glossary.php?

Guess GSP doesn't consider the NAVGEM, JMA and 84 hour NAM as model support for the GGEM :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From GSP forecast discussion:

 

THE OP MODELS HAVE COME INTO BETTER AGREEMENT WITH THE INCOMING S/W

AND POSSIBLE COASTAL LOW SCENARIO TUE NIGHT THROUGH WED. THE 00Z CMC

CONTINUES TO PRODUCE AN OUTLYING SOLN. THE MODEL IS MUCH SLOWER THAN

THE OTHER OP MODELS DUE TO THE INGESTION OF A PACIFIC LOW. THIS

GIVES THE MODEL MORE SRN ENERGY AND AN UNREALISTIC LOOKING

STRETCHED/OUT H5 TROF AXIS...THUS NOT ALLOWING THE SFC HIGH TO BUILD

INTO THE AREA AS STRONGLY. THIS ENABLES PERSISTENT ULVL DIV TO

PRODUCE A WEAK COASTAL LOW AND COPIOUS AMOUNTS OF QPF ALONG THE

COAST WITH MEASURABLE PRECIP OVERRIDING THE ENTIRE FCST AREA. THESE

IDEAS HAVE BEEN GIVEN LITTLE TO NO WEIGHT AND INSTEAD WILL GO WITH

THE GOOD AGREEMENT BTW THE GFS/ECMWF...BOTH OF WHICH BRING IN A MORE

RELAXED S/W AND NOT MUCH IF ANY SFC REFLECTION LOW DEVELOPMENT. THIS

IDEA MAKES SENSE DUE TO THE OVERALL BROADNESS OF THE PARENT TROF

WHICH KEEPS IT/S ERN PERIPHERY WELL OFFSHORE. THUS...PRECIP THROUGH

WED WILL LIKELY BE FOCUSED ALONG THE COAST ALIGNED IN A REGION OF

OFFSHORE WEAKNESS. ALL OF THIS TO SAY...THE CWFA FCST IS NOW DRY

THROUGH THU WHICH FOLLOWS THE PREVIOUS DECREASING POP TRENDS AND

THINKING.

 

 

Now that is depressing. That being said GSP is usually pretty conservative when things are a few days out. Let's hope the NAM and CMC are on to something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6z GFS Ensemble mean spreads the love for almost all of GA, SC, and NC.  There must be some absolute bombs on the individual members!

 

 

 

There are 2 members which deliver significant snowfall to the area. The rest are dry for most everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...