All Activity

Euro is so frustrating since w heavier precip we’d probably get snow even into the metros w surface temps of 34

Can't win em all.

So what's going on, nice rainy Sunday? Any garbage time flakes?

notice how every system is a big one then as the event gets closer it just gets weaker 90% of the time

little to no accumulation is what they love the best fav phrase lol

Off to Gampel for the game tonight . Enjoy the night

It’ll be a nice refresher hopefully and make the black ice piles white again for a day or two.

You still might get that. I wouldn’t bet against the SW 1/4 of CT seeing some accums

Usually doesn't favor cold here. Wavelengths will be changing too. If blocking is ongoing in the NAO Domain, could be some wild swings as well. Pop that big HP East into Alaska and a different ballgame.

And here I thought we were friends

What did NC get last winter?

Yeah, early to mid March looks like at least a Couple possibilities imo.

Today just felt nice. Definitely helped melting a lot of the snow pack.

Your last paragraph was all I really needed ya don't have to yell... Okay fine maybe did need a little reminder of the rest too but my question wasn't exactly implying they had it better but rather just being weary of suppression, lol Recency bias! But I am starting to realize how rare it is for those other cities. It's coincidence that the examples I'm thinking about have happened during our worst snow drought in history so they stick out more--perception bias. So it could indeed end up in a place where "suppression" is not longer a thing...interesting. Now the question is how many years does it take to get to that point. I mean at least for right now we can still get storms like a few weeks ago!

Kind of funny reading these posts, arguing over a few degrees.

It is very obvious what Hoff is saying is accurate. If you don’t think our “base state” has warmed you’re in denial…and that has clearly been evident in battleground events and toss up outcomes. We’ve started to see lowland climo creep further and further n/w beyond just the fall line. The outcomes recently where our n&w areas haven’t won are bad luck, but the rest is all rooted in fact. also, stormy is one of the biggest shitposters in the history of AmericanWx, I wouldn’t even bother with that nonsense.

Danbury airport north of 84 , partly cloudy midday and a high of 42. The rest were 37-43 as I said . Funny how you now changed from 30-35 for highs to mid to upper 30s keep on changing your fake news lmao

You need to get checked out, do you lack any reading comprehension? it’s not up for debate , it’s documented online and I said partly cloudy at the airports!

Yeah, it was a widespread massive Miller A. I think around here it was probably more like 2 Feet. The Paper actually said 2 to 5 feet County Totals with up to 10 Feet Drifts. lol. So, apparently we were Jack potted that Time but just don't know to the extent of what was reported..My Parents were kids then and said they built Tunnels in it and it was up to the Window of their House and many jad to get up and clean porches off as were afraid of collapse. There's a Picture taken in Norton of the '42 Storm and it was probably 35-40" on the Level. If I find it I'll post it. Asheville recorded 16" from it. Pittsburgh over 2 Feet. March 60 had to be something to behold.

That GFS run can GFI

All I can say is not one inland site was 40’s and sunny . Not one . Mid- upper 30’s sure. Backed up by posters here . Carry on with agendas

Thats because actual real time atmospheric conditions are not being included in to these models. Everything is playing catchup rn. We snow!!

First, how do you think plants work? They rely on CO2! Let’s drop the CO2 levels by that same 0.0002, which is 50% of that 0.0004. That seemingly insignificant drop would diminish growth rates by up to 30% for plants who photosynthesize using C3 photosynthesis! Imagine how the biosphere would react to that! So I just disproved your point—that seemingly “small” fluctuation in CO2 levels makes a huge difference! Secondly, to answer your question about the “correct”, baseline temperature of Earth. It’s 14C. Here’s why: You are correct to point out that there are normal fluctuations in global temperature, and even without global warming, we just exited out of the Little Ice Age (1300-1700). At its peak global temperatures were around 13.5C. “Ice Age” may sound like a big cooldown to you, but really these fluctuations were only around 1C from peak ice age to peak “warm” age, and are smooth changes rather than abrupt. I will leave you with this. How does it make sense for the Earth to suddenly warm 1.5C in 100 years (more than the average difference between an ice age and “warm age) and call it natural? WxUSAF, forgive me, this will be my last post. Just needed to get this off my chest.

The actual progression in real time is looking much better for us down stream then what the models are showing rn. Also alot of moisture pretty far north on radar. The suppression doesn't look as bad either since its moving out the way.

NE CT (esp at elevation) is def different than the valley and SW CT. As much as we rib Kevin sometimes, his climate is way closer to ORH than HFD/BDL or anywhere southwest of there. But once the summer starts, he will use BDL again.