Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. It sure is. I already posted after the first storm a prediction of 21” minimum for Jan+, alone, in top of whatever Dec ends up with.
  3. I'll take my 3-5 inches and let the southern Maine guys have the fun, I think we're in a slightly better position as things play out in the longer term
  4. 1+ pretty much locks in a White Christmas. Looks good for most.
  5. I'd be happier if it was further up and in.
  6. Feb. 17 was a wonderful month, but if the event you've noted was the storm of 15-16, it was one of the most disappointed 6"+ snowfall in my memory, as it had been forecast as a much bigger dump. On Feb 11 a forecast 1-3 turned into 8" of 30:1 feathers with single-digit temps. Then 12-13 brought 21", bringing the pack to 47". The morning of the 15th, with depth at 44", our forecast was 12-18 - I thought "easy 50s pack, maybe even 60". As flakes began that afternoon, GYX chopped our forecast to 6-10, with the jack moving to west of Sebago. That 6.2 was heavier, temps were milder, and it only raised the pack to 46". My area (wherever I've lived) has been good at dodging IVT. We did get a surprise 2.4" on 3/21/92, but PWM had 11.4" and parts of Kennebunkport 2 feet.
  7. I come here for the weather information, I stay for the melt downs...
  8. Who wouldn’t be after what we’ve had the last 3-4 years.
  9. the euro ensemble mean temp for 1pm Friday is 32 for Leesburg. GFS its 37
  10. I'll take member 41 on the 12z ENS please and thank you.
  11. Trace to.0.5 is automatic expected amount area wide at the moment. More north west. Anymore more is great.
  12. I really want snow, but I also really like Ray’s masochistic posts, so it’s hard to know which way to root.
  13. He's a nibbler, which is exactly what I don't want as a closer. I'm happy he's out of the Bronx.
  14. Worldwide food production has increased *four-fold* since 1960. https://ourworldindata.org/agricultural-production If MMGW was a significant problem for food production I'm pretty sure that wouldn't be the case. I wouldn't propose that there will be zero impact on food production - however it is clear to anyone who knows how things work that any such impact will be vastly smaller in scale that mankind's ability to adapt and will more than offset any such negative impact (if there was to be one), such as happened after the big "Population Bomb" food-shortage scaremongering of the late 60's. Such scaremongering has been proven wrong time and again, and as such deserves to to be mocked. (World population grew by 2.7x during this period; thus food production increase outpaced - and continues to outpace - population growth, especially as population growth continues slowing.)
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...