80 Degrees to Ripping Snow: March 12th

[MillvilleWx]

6 minutes ago, MillvilleWx said:

Have to see if this is confirmed, but the temperature yesterday to having at least 0.1" of snowfall measured at DCA might be the warmest it has ever been for that occurrence. I will double check, but I believe the previous record was a temp in the upper 70s. 

This is true! The highest temperature confirmed the day prior to at least 0.1" of snow at DCA was 78F on 3/18/1934. The next day (3/19/1934), DCA measured 0.1". This was at the location prior to the new location of DCA now. 

Another tidbit that likely has been broken was the warmest temperature on the same day at least 0.1" was recorded. The previous record was 67F on 11/11/1995 before a strong cold front came through allowing for 0.2" of snow to accumulate later that day. DCA at the 08z ob (1:52AM), the temperature was 77F which would obliterate the old record by 10 degrees. This was quite the event. 

[MillvilleWx]

2 minutes ago, The Dude said:

You are correct:

From CWG (https://x.com/capitalweather/status/2032191663586545668)

 

Truly incredible event. I'll remember this winter for a long time. 

[GramaxRefugee]

4 hours ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said:

Some pictures from the snow

Chuck , that cardinal shot looks like you pointed your camera at a high quality Christmas card painted by an experienced artist. Great photo ! 

[WEATHER53]

1.5” here although it snowed at rate of 1.5”ph for two hours.  Radiance was really well minimized but still  2-3 degrees too mild.  I think Richmond hit 89 yesterday and at same time this afternoon it was 33 and heavy snow 

[WEATHER53]

20 minutes ago, MillvilleWx said:

This is true! The highest temperature confirmed the day prior to at least 0.1" of snow at DCA was 78F on 3/18/1934. The next day (3/19/1934), DCA measured 0.1". This was at the location prior to the new location of DCA now. 

Another tidbit that likely has been broken was the warmest temperature on the same day at least 0.1" was recorded. The previous record was 67F on 11/11/1995 before a strong cold front came through allowing for 0.2" of snow to accumulate later that day. DCA at the 08z ob (1:52AM), the temperature was 77F which would obliterate the old record by 10 degrees. This was quite the event. 

Yes there have gotta be a lot of records like that.  My temp spiked to 75 by 4am and 1pm 9 hours later Daytime it’s 33!and heavy snow. Many of those sort of things likely were exceeded by yesterday to today .

 

[WEATHER53]

7 hours ago, Winter Wizard said:

If you're curious, the highest temperature DCA ever recorded the day before accumulating snow prior to today was 74 degrees on 4/7/72.

If DCA recorded more than a trace, it would obliterate the record. 

And wizard that was April so wonder what the highest day before for March is?

[Eskimo Joe]

34 minutes ago, MillvilleWx said:

Truly incredible event. I'll remember this winter for a long time. 

This event raised my grade for this winter from a C to a B. Had the late Feb event worked out, it would've been a B+/A.

[WEATHER53]

7 hours ago, Winter Wizard said:

67 degrees on 11/11/95

And I’ve recounted my narrative in leaving Beltsville about 5pm at 62 and returning around 8pm in blinding snow snd 32.  Ushered in the great 1995-96 winter 

[snowfan]

How did BWI only have a T? Did they measure after it melted? Did they measure on the tarmac?

 

[dailylurker]

8 hours ago, MillvilleWx said:

Truly incredible event. I'll remember this winter for a long time. 

Absolutely! So many memorable experiences this season. Truly an incredible winter. The winter of 26 The Little Devil winter.

[WxUSAF]

BWI failure meanwhile DCA revised up to 0.2”

[Fozz]

6 hours ago, WxUSAF said:

BWI failure meanwhile DCA revised up to 0.2”

Looks like BWI changed it to an M, meaning they’re acknowledging that the data is missing for that day.

I hope they figure something out eventually. I think they should split the difference between the nearest 1.0 and 1.4 and go with 1.2”.

Sure it won’t be perfect but at the most they’ll be off by a few tenths. Better than going down in history as a false zero.

[WxUSAF]

4 minutes ago, Fozz said:

Looks like BWI changed it to an M, meaning they’re acknowledging that the data is missing for that day.

I hope they figure something out eventually. I think they should split the difference between the nearest 1.0 and 1.4 and go with 1.2”.

Sure it won’t be perfect but at the most they’ll be off by a few tenths. Better than going down in history as a false zero.

They did the M thing for several weeks regarding the back to back days in early February with dustings. Then said “F it” and went with a T both days 

[Nomz]

23 hours ago, yoda said:

@Nomz sorry bud... hope you have water with that salt