2026 Mid-Atlantic Severe Storm General Discussion

[vortex95]

Four days in a row svr risk in this area, esp. this time of year?  Sure ,lots of days get upgraded to slight risk the day of and we get 4 days in a row of svr risk, but to have days 3, 4, and 5 outlooked means synoptically it is defined and impressive, which means higher-end svr wx possible.

Usually in this part of the country, you don't get multiple days in a row w/ svr wx from NW or WNW flow b/c one wave of convection and it s/w trof clears things for moisture, and it takes a bit of time to recover.  Or the front/boundary gets pushed farther and farther S w/ each wave of convection.  But the way the mid and upper level ridge is during this period looks like it may force things to be in the same general area repeatedly.  Why not?  Every so often things do work out for relentless stormy wx in a region!

One might say, "4 days in a row, *everyone* should cash in and get crushed at least once during the period!"  I hope so.  W/ an EML present, you can do some nice things during the overnight hours, esp. with crazy LTG.
 

[vortex95]

21 hours ago, stormy said:

Would this EML encouragement of strong storms be more likely for the western ridges or eastern lower elevations ?

I don't know,  Many times in WNW or NW flow, mountains to the W do well, then is often a gap due to downslope flow between IAD and DCA, and then it picks up again due to the bay breeze and higher dew points E of I95,

But its not easy tell on any given days the "DC split" occurs, and w/ an EML present, that makes it more complex b/c nighttime convection is more common and often surface-bases, so downslope flow is not as much of a factor.
 

[stormy]

1 hour ago, vortex95 said:

I don't know,  Many times in WNW or NW flow, mountains to the W do well, then is often a gap due to downslope flow between IAD and DCA, and then it picks up again due to the bay breeze and higher dew points E of I95,

But its not easy tell on any given days the "DC split" occurs, and w/ an EML present, that makes it more complex b/c nighttime convection is more common and often surface-bases, so downslope flow is not as much of a factor.
 

Yesterday evening, this northwest perimeter flow developed a strong storm in southwest Augusta.

A couple locations received close to 2 inches of rain while a few miles away, little more than sprinkles.

[Kmlwx]

I'm encouraged given the favorable things in place. Then again - we have been burned many times by so many different failure methods. Will be curious to see what guidance looks like as we go forward in time and how the AI/ML guidance trends. 

[SnowenOutThere]

2 hours ago, vortex95 said:

Four days in a row svr risk in this area, esp. this time of year?  Sure ,lots of days get upgraded to slight risk the day of and we get 4 days in a row of svr risk, but to have days 3, 4, and 5 outlooked means synoptically it is defined and impressive, which means higher-end svr wx possible.

Usually in this part of the country, you don't get multiple days in a row w/ svr wx from NW or WNW flow b/c one wave of convection and it s/w trof clears things for moisture, and it takes a bit of time to recover.  Or the front/boundary gets pushed farther and farther S w/ each wave of convection.  But the way the mid and upper level ridge is during this period looks like it may force things to be in the same general area repeatedly.  Why not?  Every so often things do work out for relentless stormy wx in a region!

One might say, "4 days in a row, *everyone* should cash in and get crushed at least once during the period!"  I hope so.  W/ an EML present, you can do some nice things during the overnight hours, esp. with crazy LTG.
 

Hoping Cvill can get in on the action once the ridge starts to break down towards the weekend. 

[Kmlwx]

1 hour ago, Kmlwx said:

I'm encouraged given the favorable things in place. Then again - we have been burned many times by so many different failure methods. Will be curious to see what guidance looks like as we go forward in time and how the AI/ML guidance trends. 

Quoting myself but now settled in at the office...

My hunch is that ONE of the day performs for many of us - whether it's divided up into 2 days remains to be seen. But even with what @vortex95 said - I think most of us would be skeptical of seeing consecutive days impact the exact same areas. 

Perhaps the first day hits the M/D line counties more and skunks the rest of us, then perhaps the next day is more of the metro area(s), then a bit too far south for the bulk of the subforum the following day.

[yoda]

12z NAM soundings seem to like Wednesday evening into Thursday morning (21z to 06z).  What i mean is they suggest some significant severe if everything came together

[Kmlwx]

That NAM run also suggests the EML plume (at least somewhat) will be in play. 

[Kmlwx]

Though I will also say both the NAM and the GFS keep favoring areas to our north and east...hopefully it can bleed south. 

[yoda]

Just now, Kmlwx said:

Though I will also say both the NAM and the GFS keep favoring areas to our north and east...hopefully it can bleed south. 

Well the NAM only goes out to 84... and IIRC, SPC didnt really focus on our region severe-wise until Thursday and Friday - which is near the end of its run and after.  

[Eskimo Joe]

47 minutes ago, Kmlwx said:

That NAM run also suggests the EML plume (at least somewhat) will be in play. 

Never underestimate an EML in NW flow events.