Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,610
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    eloveday
    Newest Member
    eloveday
    Joined

Feb 22nd/23rd "There's no way..." Storm Thread


Maestrobjwa
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Maestrobjwa said:

It's just hard to fathom the other guidance being THAT wrong. And if this is the worst performance it's gonna be a huge indictment on what has happened...I mean the GFS is gonna lose even more credibility after this if it's wrong.

Again though, it's parallel version has been different, more like the other camps. @high riskwas right, the 06Z version did have a weaker low farther offshore, but I believe it was the 00Z 2/19 run of the GFS para that didn't have much of anything. So even this model might be trending towards the more amped members; I am not at work now so I'm not privy to the latest parallel GFS. 

But it does seem, at least to me anyway, to be a significant upgrade. Unfortunately, that means we'll have to do this all over again (verification and bias adjustment) next winter as the old GFS makes way for the new v17. It'll be okay not to trust it, but it won't likely be this far off course. Then again, I'm not a modeler so..

  • Thanks 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

4 minutes ago, Terpeast said:

I was starting to wonder if that dual low was the beginning of a cave to other guidance with the low further east. 12z didn’t have this, it was all in on a tucked low. Now we see it having one foot on other guidance, and other foot on what it showed for 12z. I think it rides the fence between these two camps for 1-2 more runs, then falls to the main camp along with other guidance. 

Yeah maybe it wasn't quite a dual low at 12Z.  I was just recalling as I looped through the surface depiction that it "jumped" suddenly to the northwest between hour 78 and 84.  And there seemed to be a sort of extension to the northwest at 78 when the low was centered east of Hatteras, then an extension to the east when it jumped toward the Delmarva area.  Maybe that was just simply how TT decided to place their "L" though and not a real jump.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, stormtracker said:

At this point, we gotta wondering what the GFS is "seeing" that others aren't.  For the mets in here, there's gotta be some kind of GFS bias built in here...this is two runs in a row of this shit

Cocaine.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Maestrobjwa said:

It shouldn't...I mean nobody should be seriously buying the GFS right now--not without the support of other guidance.

im buying it. A major model that im paying tax money for is showing me a blizzard 48 hours out

  • Haha 3
  • Weenie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...