Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    masonj4
    Newest Member
    masonj4
    Joined

Jan 24-26 Weekend Snow and Sleetfest Model Thread Part Tres


H2O
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 359
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

2 minutes ago, Ruin said:

What i keep saying strong artic high its like models and forecasters are ignoring it

Ummm, just NO.  The models and forecasters are absolutely NOT ignoring the strong Arctic high.  As others said above, even with a very strong high anchored, the dynamics counteract that at least to some extent.  Not saying the NAM or RRFS is or will be right, but it's not like as depicted the strong high is "ignored."  Likewise, forecasters are certainly not blowing it off either.  This is a mid-level layer issue and still uncertain exactly how that will evolve or how much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Terpeast said:

DGZ looks fantastic on the HRRR right before the flip, too. If this holds, oh my...

I know no one will care in here but the DGZ Sunday night here in NW VT for the storm is from 15K ft all the way to the surface on the GFS and up to 20K on the NAM producing large aggregates and a 20-25:1 snow ratio.  Incredible.  It will be interesting to see how a northern airport (BTV) does for my flight down to DC on Monday.  What could possibly go wrong?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, das said:

I know no one will care in here but the DGZ Sunday night here in NW VT for the storm is from 15K ft all the way to the surface on the GFS and up to 20K on the NAM producing large aggregates and a 20-25:1 snow ratio.  Incredible.  It will be interesting to see how a northern airport (BTV) does for my flight down to DC on Monday.  What could possibly go wrong?

Would love to see a picture of that when its occuring

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MillvilleWx said:

It’s close to sleet for a lot of people, but part of it is freezing rain with temps in the low to mid-20s. That would actually be a disaster and we would have more problems than we could ever want. 

Actually, even worse. It could be freezing rain with temps in the teens for some looking at soundings on pivotal. Good gravy. 

  • saywhat? 2
  • omg 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MillvilleWx said:

Actually, even worse. It could be freezing rain with temps in the teens for some looking at soundings on pivotal. Good gravy. 

Yeesh, if that happens!  I've experienced a couple of really nasty ice storms in Atlanta when I lived there years ago.  Pouring rain but the temperatures were below freezing, and that was a relative disaster.  But...it was not that far below freezing when it occurred.  I can only imagine  moderate-heavy ZR with temps in the low-mid 20s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Scarlet Pimpernel said:

Ummm, just NO.  The models and forecasters are absolutely NOT ignoring the strong Arctic high.  As others said above, even with a very strong high anchored, the dynamics counteract that at least to some extent.  Not saying the NAM or RRFS is or will be right, but it's not like as depicted the strong high is "ignored."  Likewise, forecasters are certainly not blowing it off either.  This is a mid-level layer issue and still uncertain exactly how that will evolve or how much.

The fresh Arctic air from a strong high heavy precipitation equals dynamic cooling and last. I looked the low's not going as far north for the primary. Then, it was earlier, so I don't know how the w why it's showing the freezing sleet line moving closer north with every run.But yet the primary low is stained more south versus what it was showed before

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Scarlet Pimpernel said:

Yeesh, if that happens!  I've experienced a couple of really nasty ice storms in Atlanta when I lived there years ago.  Pouring rain but the temperatures were below freezing, and that was a relative disaster.  But...it was not that far below freezing when it occurred.  I can only imagine  moderate-heavy ZR with temps in the low-mid 20s.

Feb 2014, night after the Super Bowl ice storm in southern PA and northern MD was my worst. That was crazy. Rain and 21° to start. School was out next day and damage all over the place. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ruin said:

The fresh Arctic air from a strong high heavy precipitation equals dynamic cooling and last. I looked the low's not going as far north for the primary. Then, it was earlier, so I don't know how the w why it's showing the freezing sleet line moving closer north with every run.But yet the primary low is stained more south versus what it was showed before

Actually I thought one of those 850 plots someone showed a page or two ago showed the primary at 18Z pushing notably farther north, like up toward the Ohio River in WV, there about, with a broad closed extension north and south through there.  Whereas it was weaker and farther south at 12Z.  I think it was the RRFS?  Either way...I am not saying that's going to be correct, but clearly some of the models are (perhaps the NAM as well, maybe not so much the globals?) doing that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had hoped 12z meant we finally stopped the bleeding. But what’s come out so far 18z resumed what had been the trend prior to 12z and in most cases lost all progress from 12z and ended worse than their 6z runs!  
 

hopefully rgem/gfs/euro come in bucking this trend but so far a major amp trend with the primary across 18z 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...