Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,510
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    RHiggins
    Newest Member
    RHiggins
    Joined

January 24-25: Miracle or Mirage


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, SnowenOutThere said:

Main change is that its a bit less intense but longer duration snowstorm. Has snow all the way back to Texas at the end of its run

1769364000-Yiny2yU1f4A.png

We already have a general 4-8 otg by that time too. I also think that it would come up the coast some. 

1769353200-gEbHzf1mLK8.png

 

Agreed, most of the forum would get 4-8” more after 144 it appears, looks solid to gain some lat after that frame. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NorthArlington101 said:

Storm definitely somehow got pushed back a day today. Which annoys me. We were gonna be in NAM range by tonight at one point!

We've lost almost 12 hours on it according to the Euro which only goes to make the forecast even further out in time 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DDweatherman said:

Agreed, most of the forum would get 4-8” more after 144 it appears, looks solid to gain some lat after that frame. 

Also on that 18Z surface/precip plot there's a lot more snow (and precip) still coming in at 144h it appears, compared to 150h at 12Z when it's mostly done and moving out (and mind you, 12Z Euro was still quite good).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, winter_warlock said:

 Hmm curious how many more  hours it snows after the 144 hr model cut off 

For reference, here's the 12Z 150h ECMWF valid at the same time.  Notice how it's moving out by then but still left us in quite good shape.  I'd say 18Z looked better with what appears to be a decent bit yet to come after 6-8".

 

ecmwf_mslp_pcpn_frzn_us_49.thumb.png.f9ab0b084331a717f5a60b44b9cb1a40.png

  • Like 2
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, SnowenOutThere said:

For all the people saying "the GEFS/GFS was better" or "its fine it has time to change" I want to put a word of caution against that. Yes, raw numbers wise they are better; however, if either of them are correct we lose the big dog or even large storm potential unless dramatic changes occur in the NS. The reason I personally hate the GFS is because they do NOT eject the SW. As for it has time to change, this is true; yet, the SW should eject within 4-5 days and we should know if it'll eject within the next day or so. We need the GFS to be wrong with its handling of the SW to get a big storm. 

I agree(you saw my post a couple pages back). 12z does actually eject significant energy from the SW, via a partial phase with the energy dropping south from the Pac NW. 18z doesnt, its flatter, but is slightly better with the silly snow maps. Ofc that's only part of the story- the timing/depth of NS energy associated with the TPV is another component.

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stormtracker said:

Should be some more after that?

A good amount more I’d wager?

The slower storm start means we’re only about 12 hours closer to game time than we were yesterday. lol

  • Like 3
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Scarlet Pimpernel said:

For reference, here's the 12Z 150h ECMWF valid at the same time.  Notice how it's moving out by then but still left us in quite good shape.  I'd say 18Z looked better with what appears to be a decent bit yet to come after 6-8".

 

ecmwf_mslp_pcpn_frzn_us_49.thumb.png.f9ab0b084331a717f5a60b44b9cb1a40.png

  Looks like maybe another 8 hours or so to go depending on how fast or slow it's moving!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Eskimo Joe said:

We're right in the wheelhouse for the Euro AI and it's ensembles. If this look maintains for the next 24 hours, then it's probably game on. North of I-70 will somehow score double digits too. They always find a way.

7H FGEN ALWAYS comes into play for these setups. A secondary jack will occur on the northern fringe and that can actually be pretty prolific. That happened with a few storms in the past where people in Central PA were puking dendrites and got 1-2’ while we got hammered further south with the 85H FGEN and traditional deform. More than one way to score, and that stuff is a long way from getting resolved. I like what the ECMWF and AIFS are depicting. GFS improved too, just a bit different on evolution. 

  • Like 12
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stormtracker said:

Let's just weenie out and only use Kuchera maps from here on out....until it shows less snow...then switch to 10:1

A red tagger earlier said 12:1 or so was reasonable, I think. 

check your texts

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stormtracker said:

Let's just weenie out and only use Kuchera maps from here on out....until it shows less snow...then switch to 10:1

 

1 minute ago, mappy said:

A red tagger earlier said 12:1 or so was reasonable, I think. 

check your texts

15,000ft deep DGZ! Pants tent.

 

  • Like 4
  • Haha 2
  • saywhat? 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...