Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,478
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    RHiggins
    Newest Member
    RHiggins
    Joined

First Legit Storm Potential of the Season Upon Us


40/70 Benchmark
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, weathafella said:

AIfS quite robust.  I have qpf and it looks like >0.5 to the CT River 

Lol it actually got better versus 06z. What a mega disaster this is gonna be for the skynets. Or it will be one of the great coups. 

  • Like 5
  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The resolution is what always puts me off with the AIs. There’s no fine details like the deterministic ops. Everything is more coarse and “fuzzy”.

I feel like that would provide more consistency in the mid or long range, but would result in being over generous in the short range. That’s why I always treat them like ens means.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dendrite said:

The resolution is what always puts me off with the AIs. There’s no fine details like the deterministic ops. Everything is more coarse and “fuzzy”.

I feel like that would provide more consistency in the mid or long range, but would result in being over generous in the short range. That’s why I always treat them like ens means.

Tip said yesterday it reminds him of the old MRF graphics…that’s a pretty good description. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dendrite said:

The resolution is what always puts me off with the AIs. There’s no fine details like the deterministic ops. Everything is more coarse and “fuzzy”.

I feel like that would provide more consistency in the mid or long range, but would result in being over generous in the short range. That’s why I always treat them like ens means.

 Not sure if it’s related to learning, but it does sharpen the gradient as we get closer. I try to look at the Synoptics too for trends be precip because it’s so broad brushed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Tip said yesterday it reminds him of the old MRF graphics…that’s a pretty good description. 

Yeah…like you’re painting the maps with a small paint brush instead of a fine tipped marker.

Like when the MRF would slap .01-0.10” in NW flow over all of New England when you knew it was just sensing the mountains and that we’d be dry while upslope areas dumped.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CoastalWx said:

 Not sure if it’s related to learning, but it does sharpen the gradient as we get closer. I try to look at the Synoptics too for trends be precip because it’s so broad brushed

It does, but the ens means do as well.

image.gif

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said:

Everyone knows I haven’t been bullish on this one, but it’s honestly close enough to not yet punt on a minor to moderate event. This is a real battle. 

The surface trends are pretty wild , another 4 cycles like that and it looks like it’s AI counterpart

IMG_1297.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...