steve392 Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago Had heavy sleet turn back to big flake snow then back to sleet then snow again. Up in Dumont, nj and it's plain snow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The 4 Seasons Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago Looks like OKX/PHI cut back on amounts and downgraded warnings to advisories for Somerset and Middlesex. Saw that coming, glad we went conservative there 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve392 Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago Heavy heavy snows in Dumont, nj right now. Really accumulating. Salting isn't going to do anything now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDweatherman Posted 15 hours ago Share Posted 15 hours ago On 12/25/2025 at 4:33 PM, PhiEaglesfan712 said: That has no correlation. NYC cashing in on a snowstorm doesn't mean everyone is going to win come January. For all we know, DC could end up with a final season snow total of 3-4" (see below). That season had one of the oddest snow distributions ever. Places in upstate NY finished the season with over 150 inches of snow, while places like Baltimore and DC finished with less than 4 inches of snow. I’m late on my reply. I meant that in no meteorological way. It was really just supporting my northern brethren in hopes that we get a miller A or a big hybrid low that blesses the masses later this winter! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TriPol Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago Winter Storm Warnings are canceled for the immediate Metro area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donsutherland1 Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 17 hours ago, donsutherland1 said: I'll do the 18z HRRR, too. I think that model is often cold-biased, but let's see how it does. 18z HRRR. I will also compare the 18z NAM and 18z HRRR. My point estimates: Bridgeport: 8.0" Islip: 7.9" New York City (Central Park): 5.8" Newark: 4.8" 18z NAM vs. 18z HRRR: Here's how I fared against the two models: Final Accumulations: Bridgeport: 7.1" Islip: 6.6" New York City-Central Park: 4.3" New York City-JFK Airport: 4.1" New York City-LaGuardia Airport: 4.1" Newark: 4.2" The low end of the 4"-8" idea worked out. The loss of precipitation from the weak lift that developed in the spacing between the surface and mid-level low likely deprived the region of several inches of snow. It also allowed for some intrusion of sleet into the greater New York City area for a time until the lift improved. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastonSN+ Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 9 minutes ago, donsutherland1 said: 18z NAM vs. 18z HRRR: Here's how I fared against the two models: Final Accumulations: Bridgeport: 7.1" Islip: 6.6" New York City-Central Park: 4.3" New York City-JFK Airport: 4.1" New York City-LaGuardia Airport: 4.1" Newark: 4.2" The low end of the 4"-8" idea worked out. The loss of precipitation from the weak lift that developed in the spacing between the surface and mid-level lows likely deprived the region of several inches of snow. It also allowed for some intrusion of sleet into the greater New York City area for a time until the lift improved. You nailed this one Don. Great job! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BxEngine Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 24 minutes ago, donsutherland1 said: 18z NAM vs. 18z HRRR: Here's how I fared against the two models: Final Accumulations: Bridgeport: 7.1" Islip: 6.6" New York City-Central Park: 4.3" New York City-JFK Airport: 4.1" New York City-LaGuardia Airport: 4.1" Newark: 4.2" The low end of the 4"-8" idea worked out. The loss of precipitation from the weak lift that developed in the spacing between the surface and mid-level lows likely deprived the region of several inches of snow. It also allowed for some intrusion of sleet into the greater New York City area for a time until the lift improved. This is kind of awesome to see, thank you for doing that work! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnoSki14 Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago So the no 4" streak is officially over then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donsutherland1 Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago Just now, SnoSki14 said: So the no 4" streak is officially over then For snowstorms, it's over. Finally. For daily snowfalls, it, unfortunately, continues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donsutherland1 Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago As forecasting accuracy requires, among other things, an objective assessment of the guidance, I've expanded the comparison of the 12/26 18z NAM and 12/26 18z HRRR. The major point of contention had been whether the NAM was providing a realistic forecast for the New York City area. It did not fare well. But what over a larger area? Again, the HRRR outperformed the NAM, but its forecasting edge was less decisive. The HRRR was better in assessing where the 4" or above snows would fall from New York City southward. The NAM confined such snows to the north and east of New York City. However, the HRRR was too aggressive in pushing 2"+ snows past Allentown and into Philadelphia. The HRRR also did better in such locations as Albany and Boston. 12/26 18z NAM: 12/26 18z HRRR: Outcomes for 12 Cities: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now