Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,631
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    BroadWing3544
    Newest Member
    BroadWing3544
    Joined

Central PA Winter 25/26 Discussion and Obs


MAG5035
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Itstrainingtime said:

Well that matches my call for my area to a T.

But is this done bleeding east?

That's the big question.  How many times have we seen significant shifts in the final 24 hours.  If you look across the 12z suite thus far you can see a slight eastward shift, even in some of the lesser talked about models.  Hope this isn't the start of the rug being pulled.

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This storm is going to hurt…yes maybe most of us see 3-6/4-8, but hell 50-75 miles east is getting a blizzard. Not fun. Yes I’m a snow weenie as much as anyone! :lol: Hope the NAM is right…it was for the big snow/sleet storm a month ago with the warm nose…

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mount Joy Snowman said:

That's the big question.  How many times have we seen significant shifts in the final 24 hours.  If you look across the 12z suite thus far you can see a slight eastward shift, even in some of the lesser talked about models.  Hope this isn't the start of the rug being pulled.

As I said, big concern, only because it has happened before. Hopefully, it's just noise, and perhaps still trends a bit west to help out true central a bit more.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From @MillvilleWx a few minutes ago:

500mb progression on the GFS is actually similar to the HRRR/RAP/NAMNest/NAM in terms of when the height fields close off and their general placements through 12z Monday. The GFS doesn't have anything beyond 09z Monday unless you're at the coast and drifts quickly to the northeast to limit additional snowfall which other models carry. I think it's cutting that off too quickly, and it also doesn't have the leading edge further north into the NW zones and the north-central portion of the sub-forum as it migrates the heaviest further south towards Rt50 and SoMD. I feel the initial is better handled by the rest of guidance. 

ECMWF is the furthest east, weakest, and driest. Unless is scores a major coup there, it's underdoing things too much, even if it had the "right" idea of being a bit further east. 

I am forecasting now and I can tell you I will not be using much EC deterministic, but more its ensemble blends to help with the forecast. What you see for the official WPC forecast is mine, so that will be what I think. I'll share when its online. 

 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, HBGCPA10 said:

I just don't see heavy accumulations in Harrisburg. Too warm prior to the storm, too warm during Sunday, late February sun angle. Going to need heavy snow during the night and I don't think we see much of that.

My high so far for the day is 48.

Yeah it seems like Harrisburg proper might struggle with this one.  All depends on if any of the coastal bands reach out that far through the overnight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mount Joy Snowman said:

Yeah it seems like Harrisburg proper might struggle with this one.  All depends on if any of the coastal bands reach out that far through the overnight.

What are we defining as a struggle? Again, we aren’t getting the 12+ totals to our east. But 72 hours ago we weren’t getting anything, except maybe a phantom IVT that’s impossible to pin down with any accuracy. I think 3-6” is a huge win. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, GrandmasterB said:

What are we defining as a struggle? Again, we aren’t getting the 12+ totals to our east. But 72 hours ago we weren’t getting anything, except maybe a phantom IVT that’s impossible to pin down with any accuracy. I think 3-6” is a huge win. 

If I get 4” I consider that a huge success and somewhat unlikely outcome (I do doubt roads get covered completely here). Here s hoping it happens!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, GrandmasterB said:

What are we defining as a struggle? Again, we aren’t getting the 12+ totals to our east. But 72 hours ago we weren’t getting anything, except maybe a phantom IVT that’s impossible to pin down with any accuracy. I think 3-6” is a huge win. 

I hope we get 6-8 just to shut up local news weather always low balling us 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 12z short range models are showing what “should” happen with a deepening coastal low. Banding should push “well” inland similar to a tropical storm. There will also be a pivot point when the storm reaches & begins to pass our latitude to northeast. The backside of these events can be prolific as well if you get into a productive band.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...