Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,283
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    happyclam13
    Newest Member
    happyclam13
    Joined

Tropical Depression Nine


WxWatcher007
 Share

Recommended Posts

56 minutes ago, wthrmn654 said:

Cmc and euro ai want to bring it to the Mid Atlantic/ north east before all is said and done...... that's after wandering off the south east.  

 

Will have to keep an eye on that to see off that becomes a thing or not. 

I say bring it. We definitely need some good rain here in Eastern PA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said:

It looks like there may be enough of a wind shift to designate this at 11am. 

HNsXGN4.png

Yea this looks like a depression now or by 11 am as you said.  Humberto is pretty far away east from this system.

 

It’s obvious that Humberto turns out to sea gotta wait to see how high pressure builds into the Northeast and Mid Atlantic to put the block in place to initiate movement towards South Carolina, then the stall of Imelda, followed by the bounce off the high to the north and deflection out to sea.  Pretty simply put all about exact timing of players build and strength. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 The last frame of 6Z Euro has this stop its ENE movement and then suddenly drift back due W fwiw as Humberto accelerates away and the upper high builds enough to its N to change the steering. 

 Although this is the only major op doing this, 40% of the 6Z EPS do not escape and most of those stall not too far offshore and then attain a W component of motion.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GaWx said:

 The last frame of 6Z Euro has this stop its ENE movement and then suddenly drift back due W fwiw as Humberto accelerates away and the. the upper high builds enough to its N to change the steering. 

 Although this is the only major op doing this, 40% of the 6Z EPS do not escape and most of those stall not too far offshore and then attain a W component of motion.

And should that happen, the longitude of future Imelda will be key to whether this gets steered back to the coast or merely meanders until the trough eventually arrives to kick it into the North Atlantic. Like @donsutherland1 I’m skeptical of it getting steered back west right now but it’s on the table. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about we keep the wishcasting and nonsense bust posting out of the thread? 

Recon just submitted a VDM. I think that should be enough for a designation at 11.

Product: NOAA Vortex Message (URNT12 KWBC)
Transmitted: 27th day of the month at 13:54Z
Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
Aircraft: Lockheed WP-3D Orion (Reg. Num. N42RF)
Storm Number & Year: 09L in 2025
Mission Identifier: Ptc09 (flight in the North Atlantic basin)
Mission Number: 11
Observation Number: 28 ( See all messages of this type for this mission. )

A. Time of Center Fix: 27th day of the month at 13:04:10Z
B. Center Fix Coordinates: 22.00N 76.00W
B. Center Fix Location: 129 statute miles (208 km) to the ENE (71°) from Camagüey, Cuba.
C. Minimum Height at Standard Level: 3,144m (10,315ft) at 700mb
D. Minimum Sea Level Pressure: 1007mb (29.74 inHg)
E. Dropsonde Surface Wind at Center: From 125° at 25kts (From the SE at 29mph)
F. Eye Character: Not Available
G. Eye Shape: Not Available
H. Estimated (by SFMR or visually) Maximum Surface Wind Inbound: Not Available
I. Location & Time of the Estimated Maximum Surface Wind Inbound (Undecoded): NA
J. Maximum Flight Level Wind Inbound: From 146° at 27kts (From between the SE and SSE at 31.1mph)
K. Location & Time of the Maximum Flight Level Wind Inbound: 8 nautical miles to the SE (135°) of center fix at 13:02:18Z
L. Estimated (by SFMR or visually) Maximum Surface Wind Outbound: Not Available
M. Location & Time of the Estimated Maximum Surface Wind Outbound (Undecoded): NA
N. Maximum Flight Level Wind Outbound: From 40° at 25kts (From the NE at 28.8mph)
O. Location & Time of the Maximum Flight Level Wind Outbound: 16 nautical miles (18 statute miles) to the NW (314°) of center fix at 13:08:03Z
P. Maximum Flight Level Temp & Pressure Altitude Outside Eye: 10°C (50°F) at a pressure alt. of 3,056m (10,026ft)
Q. Maximum Flight Level Temp & Pressure Altitude Inside Eye: 11°C (52°F) at a pressure alt. of 3,058m (10,033ft)
R. Dewpoint Temp (collected at same location as temp inside eye): 12°C (54°F)
R. Sea Surface Temp (collected at same location as temp inside eye): Not Available
S. Fix Determined By: Penetration, Wind, Pressure and Temperature
S. Fix Level: 700mb
T. Navigational Fix Accuracy: 0.01 nautical miles
T. Meteorological Accuracy: 1.5 nautical miles

Remarks Section:
 

Maximum Flight Level Wind: 27kts (~ 31.1mph) which was observed 8 nautical miles to the SE (135°) from the flight level center at 13:02:18Z
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, donsutherland1 said:

With the NHC now referring to Google DeepMind in some of its discussions, below is the latest Google DeepMind output for PTC9 at closest approach on the ensemble mean track:

image.thumb.png.aa63eb8312ff499bb0865c865a2bcd2a.png

I have mixed opinions on the NHC utilizing DeepMind during the infancy of the AI revolution.  It should absolutely be used as a tool, but Im not sure we are at the point where it should be used as a weighted metric in forecast discussions with the public.  

 

Model fatigue is a very real thing.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, dseagull said:

I have mixed opinions on the NHC utilizing DeepMind during the infancy of the AI revolution.  It should absolutely be used as a tool, but Im not sure we are at the point where it should be used as a weighted metric in forecast discussions with the public.  

 

Model fatigue is a very real thing.  

Agree.  I was surprised when I saw AI in their discussions earlier this year.  I'd keep it "in house" for a few years to establish some kind of track record.  So new and unproven.  They mention Google but nothing about any of the other AI guidance available.  I find that kind of odd as well.

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, MANDA said:

Agree.  I was surprised when I saw AI in their discussions earlier this year.  I'd keep it "in house" for a few years to establish some kind of track record.  So new and unproven.  They mention Google but nothing about any of the other AI guidance available.  I find that kind of odd as well.

LOL.  AT 11:00 A.M. they mention NOAA AIGEFS in the Humberto discussion.  First mention of another AI guidance I've seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • WxWatcher007 changed the title to Tropical Depression Nine

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...