Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,179
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    DClerico
    Newest Member
    DClerico
    Joined

January 28-29, 2022 Miller abcdefu Storm Threat


WxUSAF
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Bob Chill said:

The whole argument is stupid af. LWX uses the term "model trends" all the Fn time. Why is this even being debated? Who are these people? I swear there's contaminated drinking water somewhere

The “trend is our friend” is much easier to say than “the models don’t remember the previous run and each should be weighted equally is our friend”

  • Like 1
  • Haha 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stormtracker said:

Northern stream digging in a bit better.  heights slightly higher out in front at 45

Heights out in front are important for trough axis later on. A good thing to check is the TPV up in Canada to see if thats lowering them at all. Looks good on this run so far

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bob Chill said:

The whole argument is stupid af. LWX uses the term "model trends" all the Fn time. Why is this even being debated? Who are these people? I swear there's contaminated drinking water somewhere. I think cockumblockuminfection should call 936-1212 and argue with wx53 about it

Thank you. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, clskinsfan said:

Look at the difference in the position of the PV from 18Z. Should have more space to climb once it starts to phase as well. Just guessing. But I think we are about to get Nam'ed.

Let’s bring her home 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, clskinsfan said:

Look at the difference in the position of the PV from 18Z. Should have more space to climb once it starts to phase as well. Just guessing. But I think we are about to get Nam'ed.

Thats my hunch thus far, the heights being pumped a bit out front is one of the biggest things I was "concerned" about overall and want to see improve next that could change the game for us. The TPV has a big affect on that aspect

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Bob Chill said:

The whole argument is stupid af. LWX uses the term "model trends" all the Fn time. Why is this even being debated? Who are these people? I swear there's contaminated drinking water somewhere. I think cockumblockuminfection should call 936-1212 and argue with wx53 about it

Dam. Ouch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Bob Chill said:

The whole argument is stupid af. LWX uses the term "model trends" all the Fn time. Why is this even being debated? Who are these people? I swear there's contaminated drinking water somewhere. I think cockumblockuminfection should call 936-1212 and argue with wx53 about it

I hate having to ignore so many people. But I just have too so I can maintain my sanity. 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stormtracker said:

positive trends continue at 51  Same as above   slightly higher heights ahead and better angle of vorts

Liking where the TPV is and the angle of its influence, helps those NE heights over us. Could make for a nice trough axis if this phases cleanly/closes off

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • mappy locked and unpinned this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...